Improved clinical outcomes and a low rate of failure following implantation of a patellofemoral inlay arthroplasty model featuring an enlarged lateral offset – a prospective clinical and radiographic evaluation at short term follow-up

Abstract

Purpose

To prospectively evaluate clinical, functional, radiographic, and sports-related short-term outcomes following isolated patellofemoral inlay arthroplasty (PFIA) utilizing an inlay arthroplasty model featuring an enlarged lateral offset.

Methods

Patients who underwent patellofemoral inlay arthroplasty (PFIA) with the Hemi-CAP^® Kahuna Prosthesis (Anika Therapeutics, Franklin, MA, USA) between January 2017 and July 2020 were included in the study and assessed both preoperatively and at a minimum follow-up of 24 months postoperatively. Patient-reported outcomes measures (PROs) included the transformed Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Arthritis Index (WOMAC), Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) for pain, and Tegner Activity Scale. The Kellgren-Lawrence grading scale was used to assess tibiofemoral osteoarthritis (OA) progression. The Caton-Deschamps Index was used to assess differences in pre- to postoperative patellar height.

Results

Eighteen patients (19 knees, 86% follow-up) were available at 28.2 ± 9.1 (range 24.0–55.0) months. WOMAC score (55.8 ± 16.0 to 77.2 ± 17.0; p <.001) and VAS for pain (6.1 ± 2.3 to 2.7 ± 2.1; p <.001) improved statistically significantly from pre- to postoperative whereas the mean Tegner Activity Scale (2.5 ± 1.3 to 3.1 ± 1.3; p >.05) improved slightly. No significant progression of tibiofemoral OA (p >.05) or changes in patellar height (p >.05) were observed. No implant-related maltracking or patellar instability was reported. One patient (5.3%) required revision surgery due to aseptic component loosening.

Conclusion

Isolated patellofemoral inlay arthroplasty (PFIA) utilizing an implant with an enlarged lateral offset has been shown to be an effective and safe intervention for patients with symptomatic patellofemoral osteoarthritis. The procedure significantly improved knee function and pain relief, with low failure rates observed at short-term follow-up.

Level of evidence

4, prospective case series.