Standard versus double dosing of beta-lactam antibiotics in critically ill patients with sepsis: The BULLSEYE study protocol for a multicenter randomized controlled trial.

IF 3 3区 医学 Q2 INFECTIOUS DISEASES BMC Infectious Diseases Pub Date : 2025-03-21 DOI:10.1186/s12879-025-10747-3
M M B Horstink, D R Geel, C A den Uil, P E Deetman, H Endeman, A Abdulla, T M Bosch, W J R Rietdijk, F W Thielen, J J Haringman, P van Vliet, T A Rijpstra, C Bethlehem, A Beishuizen, A E Muller, B C P Koch
{"title":"Standard versus double dosing of beta-lactam antibiotics in critically ill patients with sepsis: The BULLSEYE study protocol for a multicenter randomized controlled trial.","authors":"M M B Horstink, D R Geel, C A den Uil, P E Deetman, H Endeman, A Abdulla, T M Bosch, W J R Rietdijk, F W Thielen, J J Haringman, P van Vliet, T A Rijpstra, C Bethlehem, A Beishuizen, A E Muller, B C P Koch","doi":"10.1186/s12879-025-10747-3","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Sepsis and septic shock are significant global healthcare challenges with high mortality rates. Effective management requires timely and adequate antimicrobial therapy. Beta-lactam antibiotics, commonly used in patients with sepsis, are crucial for treating these infections. However, standard dosing often leads to insufficient plasma levels due to dynamic physiological changes in critically ill patients. Previous randomized controlled trials highlighted the need for timely dose adjustments to improve clinical outcomes. This is the study protocol for the BULLSEYE trial in which we aim to optimize antibiotic treatment during the initial 48 h of sepsis by comparing standard to double dosing of beta-lactam antibiotics.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This open-label, multicenter, randomized controlled trial will compare standard to double dosing of beta-lactam antibiotics (cefuroxime, ceftazidime, ceftriaxone, cefotaxime, amoxicillin, amoxicillin/clavulanic acid, flucloxacillin, meropenem, and piperacillin/clavulanic acid) in critically ill patients with septic shock. Participants will be randomized into two arms: the control arm receiving standard care, and the intervention arm receiving double antibiotic doses for 48 h, irrespective of renal function. Following this period, all patients will receive standard doses as per local protocol. The primary outcome is all cause 28-day mortality, with secondary outcomes including 90-day, 365-day, hospital and ICU mortality, hospital and ICU length of stay, SOFA scores, time to shock reversal, microbiological eradication, clinical cure, pharmacodynamic target attainment, safety, quality of life, and medical consumption.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>The BULLSEYE trial aims to improve sepsis treatment in critically ill patients. Despite anticipated recruitment challenges, its large sample size ensures robust comparability. This pivotal trial could significantly impact sepsis treatment, leading to better clinical outcomes.</p><p><strong>Trial registration: </strong>EU_CT 2024-512950-13-00. Protocol version 2.3, protocol date 09-12-2024. Prospectively registered on 09-01-2025 at Clinicaltrails.gov nr. NCT06766461.</p>","PeriodicalId":8981,"journal":{"name":"BMC Infectious Diseases","volume":"25 1","pages":"392"},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11929207/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMC Infectious Diseases","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12879-025-10747-3","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"INFECTIOUS DISEASES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Sepsis and septic shock are significant global healthcare challenges with high mortality rates. Effective management requires timely and adequate antimicrobial therapy. Beta-lactam antibiotics, commonly used in patients with sepsis, are crucial for treating these infections. However, standard dosing often leads to insufficient plasma levels due to dynamic physiological changes in critically ill patients. Previous randomized controlled trials highlighted the need for timely dose adjustments to improve clinical outcomes. This is the study protocol for the BULLSEYE trial in which we aim to optimize antibiotic treatment during the initial 48 h of sepsis by comparing standard to double dosing of beta-lactam antibiotics.

Methods: This open-label, multicenter, randomized controlled trial will compare standard to double dosing of beta-lactam antibiotics (cefuroxime, ceftazidime, ceftriaxone, cefotaxime, amoxicillin, amoxicillin/clavulanic acid, flucloxacillin, meropenem, and piperacillin/clavulanic acid) in critically ill patients with septic shock. Participants will be randomized into two arms: the control arm receiving standard care, and the intervention arm receiving double antibiotic doses for 48 h, irrespective of renal function. Following this period, all patients will receive standard doses as per local protocol. The primary outcome is all cause 28-day mortality, with secondary outcomes including 90-day, 365-day, hospital and ICU mortality, hospital and ICU length of stay, SOFA scores, time to shock reversal, microbiological eradication, clinical cure, pharmacodynamic target attainment, safety, quality of life, and medical consumption.

Discussion: The BULLSEYE trial aims to improve sepsis treatment in critically ill patients. Despite anticipated recruitment challenges, its large sample size ensures robust comparability. This pivotal trial could significantly impact sepsis treatment, leading to better clinical outcomes.

Trial registration: EU_CT 2024-512950-13-00. Protocol version 2.3, protocol date 09-12-2024. Prospectively registered on 09-01-2025 at Clinicaltrails.gov nr. NCT06766461.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
脓毒症重症患者使用β-内酰胺类抗生素的标准剂量与双重剂量:BULLSEYE 多中心随机对照试验研究方案。
背景:脓毒症和脓毒性休克是具有高死亡率的重大全球卫生保健挑战。有效的管理需要及时和充分的抗菌治疗。通常用于败血症患者的β -内酰胺类抗生素对治疗这些感染至关重要。然而,由于危重患者的动态生理变化,标准剂量往往导致血浆水平不足。先前的随机对照试验强调了及时调整剂量以改善临床结果的必要性。这是BULLSEYE试验的研究方案,我们的目标是通过比较标准剂量和双倍剂量的β -内酰胺类抗生素,在败血症的最初48小时内优化抗生素治疗。方法:这项开放标签、多中心、随机对照试验将比较标准剂量和双剂量β -内酰胺类抗生素(头孢呋辛、头孢他啶、头孢曲松、头孢噻肟、阿莫西林、阿莫西林/克拉维酸、氟氯西林、美罗培南和哌拉西林/克拉维酸)对感染性休克危重患者的影响。参与者将被随机分为两组:对照组接受标准治疗,干预组接受双剂量抗生素治疗48小时,不考虑肾功能。在此期间之后,所有患者将按照当地方案接受标准剂量。主要终点是28天全因死亡率,次要终点包括90天、365天、住院和ICU死亡率、住院和ICU住院时间、SOFA评分、休克逆转时间、微生物根除、临床治愈、药效学目标实现、安全性、生活质量和医疗消费。讨论:BULLSEYE试验旨在改善危重症患者的败血症治疗。尽管预计招聘将面临挑战,但其庞大的样本量确保了强大的可比性。这项关键试验可能会显著影响败血症的治疗,导致更好的临床结果。试验注册:EU_CT 2024-512950-13-00。协议版本2.3,协议日期09-12-2024。前瞻性注册于2025年9月1日,注册号:Clinicaltrails.gov . NCT06766461。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
BMC Infectious Diseases
BMC Infectious Diseases 医学-传染病学
CiteScore
6.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
860
审稿时长
3.3 months
期刊介绍: BMC Infectious Diseases is an open access, peer-reviewed journal that considers articles on all aspects of the prevention, diagnosis and management of infectious and sexually transmitted diseases in humans, as well as related molecular genetics, pathophysiology, and epidemiology.
期刊最新文献
Clinical utility of a cerebrospinal fluid multiplex PCR meningitis/encephalitis panel in children: a retrospective review of positive results. Assessment of influenza burden, preventive behaviours, and vaccination uptake among multi-ethnic university students in the United Arab Emirates: a cross-sectional study. Analysis of factors influencing patient delay in tuberculosis patients in Northeast China: surveillance data from 2015 to 2024. Prevalence of multidrug resistant and ESBL producing Enterobacteriaceae among patients with urinary tract infections in Southwest Shewa, Ethiopia. Serum HDAC3 as an early biomarker for prediction and staging of sepsis-associated AKI: prospective cohort study.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1