{"title":"“It’s Kind of Like Figure It Out:” Experiences of K-2 Educational Professionals with Teaching Writing","authors":"Meaghan McKenna, Rachel E. Schachter","doi":"10.1007/s10643-025-01905-y","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>The purpose of this article is to elevate the voices of kindergarten through second grade (K-2) educational professionals regarding their experiences teaching writing. Although reading instruction continues to dominate public attention, there is a need to better understand the current state of writing, an often neglected content area, from educational professionals who are delivering instruction. Specifically, this can expand our current knowledge by allowing us to understand the state of writing through educators’ sharing of their lived experiences. Twenty-seven educational professionals (18 general education classroom teachers, six specialists working in intervention and coaching roles, and three speech-language pathologists) working with kindergarten, first, and/or second grade students in public and private school settings across the United States participated in semi-structured interviews. Reflexive thematic analysis was used to analyze data. Results indicate that writing remains a low priority content area. Reasons provided include limited guidance and resources for assessment, instruction, and data-based decision making especially when compared to reading and mathematics. Many participants expressed a lack of confidence and identified writing-related areas of interest for professional growth and development; however, we still identified promising practices used to teach writing. Our findings illustrate the importance of elevating K-2 educators’ perspectives to better understand their teaching practice and call attention to the need for future research to create and evaluate writing-related professional learning opportunities and resources rooted in research and evidence-based practice that can be immediately translated into educational settings.</p>","PeriodicalId":47818,"journal":{"name":"Early Childhood Education Journal","volume":"71 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Early Childhood Education Journal","FirstCategoryId":"95","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10643-025-01905-y","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
The purpose of this article is to elevate the voices of kindergarten through second grade (K-2) educational professionals regarding their experiences teaching writing. Although reading instruction continues to dominate public attention, there is a need to better understand the current state of writing, an often neglected content area, from educational professionals who are delivering instruction. Specifically, this can expand our current knowledge by allowing us to understand the state of writing through educators’ sharing of their lived experiences. Twenty-seven educational professionals (18 general education classroom teachers, six specialists working in intervention and coaching roles, and three speech-language pathologists) working with kindergarten, first, and/or second grade students in public and private school settings across the United States participated in semi-structured interviews. Reflexive thematic analysis was used to analyze data. Results indicate that writing remains a low priority content area. Reasons provided include limited guidance and resources for assessment, instruction, and data-based decision making especially when compared to reading and mathematics. Many participants expressed a lack of confidence and identified writing-related areas of interest for professional growth and development; however, we still identified promising practices used to teach writing. Our findings illustrate the importance of elevating K-2 educators’ perspectives to better understand their teaching practice and call attention to the need for future research to create and evaluate writing-related professional learning opportunities and resources rooted in research and evidence-based practice that can be immediately translated into educational settings.
期刊介绍:
Early Childhood Education Journal is a professional publication of original peer-reviewed articles that reflect exemplary practices in the field of contemporary early childhood education. Articles cover the social, physical, emotional, and intellectual development of children age birth through 8, analyzing issues, trends, and practices from an educational perspective. The journal publishes feature-length articles that skillfully blend 1) theory, research, and practice, 2) descriptions of outstanding early childhood programs worldwide, and 3) quantitative, qualitative, and mixed-methods research. Early Childhood Education Journal is of interest not only to classroom teachers, child care providers, college and university faculty, and administrators, but also to other professionals in psychology, health care, family relations, and social services dedicated to the care of young children.
Areas of Emphasis:
International studies;
Educational programs in diverse settings;
Early learning across multiple domains;
Projects demonstrating inter-professional collaboration;
Qualitative and quantitative research and case studies;
Best practices in early childhood teacher education;
Theory, research, and practice relating to professional development;
Family, school, and community relationships;
Investigations related to curriculum and instruction;
Articles that link theory and best practices;
Reviews of research with well-articulated connections to the field