“It’s Kind of Like Figure It Out:” Experiences of K-2 Educational Professionals with Teaching Writing

IF 2.3 3区 教育学 Q1 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH Early Childhood Education Journal Pub Date : 2025-03-24 DOI:10.1007/s10643-025-01905-y
Meaghan McKenna, Rachel E. Schachter
{"title":"“It’s Kind of Like Figure It Out:” Experiences of K-2 Educational Professionals with Teaching Writing","authors":"Meaghan McKenna, Rachel E. Schachter","doi":"10.1007/s10643-025-01905-y","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>The purpose of this article is to elevate the voices of kindergarten through second grade (K-2) educational professionals regarding their experiences teaching writing. Although reading instruction continues to dominate public attention, there is a need to better understand the current state of writing, an often neglected content area, from educational professionals who are delivering instruction. Specifically, this can expand our current knowledge by allowing us to understand the state of writing through educators’ sharing of their lived experiences. Twenty-seven educational professionals (18 general education classroom teachers, six specialists working in intervention and coaching roles, and three speech-language pathologists) working with kindergarten, first, and/or second grade students in public and private school settings across the United States participated in semi-structured interviews. Reflexive thematic analysis was used to analyze data. Results indicate that writing remains a low priority content area. Reasons provided include limited guidance and resources for assessment, instruction, and data-based decision making especially when compared to reading and mathematics. Many participants expressed a lack of confidence and identified writing-related areas of interest for professional growth and development; however, we still identified promising practices used to teach writing. Our findings illustrate the importance of elevating K-2 educators’ perspectives to better understand their teaching practice and call attention to the need for future research to create and evaluate writing-related professional learning opportunities and resources rooted in research and evidence-based practice that can be immediately translated into educational settings.</p>","PeriodicalId":47818,"journal":{"name":"Early Childhood Education Journal","volume":"71 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Early Childhood Education Journal","FirstCategoryId":"95","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10643-025-01905-y","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The purpose of this article is to elevate the voices of kindergarten through second grade (K-2) educational professionals regarding their experiences teaching writing. Although reading instruction continues to dominate public attention, there is a need to better understand the current state of writing, an often neglected content area, from educational professionals who are delivering instruction. Specifically, this can expand our current knowledge by allowing us to understand the state of writing through educators’ sharing of their lived experiences. Twenty-seven educational professionals (18 general education classroom teachers, six specialists working in intervention and coaching roles, and three speech-language pathologists) working with kindergarten, first, and/or second grade students in public and private school settings across the United States participated in semi-structured interviews. Reflexive thematic analysis was used to analyze data. Results indicate that writing remains a low priority content area. Reasons provided include limited guidance and resources for assessment, instruction, and data-based decision making especially when compared to reading and mathematics. Many participants expressed a lack of confidence and identified writing-related areas of interest for professional growth and development; however, we still identified promising practices used to teach writing. Our findings illustrate the importance of elevating K-2 educators’ perspectives to better understand their teaching practice and call attention to the need for future research to create and evaluate writing-related professional learning opportunities and resources rooted in research and evidence-based practice that can be immediately translated into educational settings.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
相关文献
GAS ATOM SCATTERING IN LOW‐ENERGY ELECTRON DIFFRACTION
IF 4 2区 物理与天体物理Applied Physics LettersPub Date : 1962-10-01 DOI: 10.1063/1.1753694
C. W. Tucker
Low-energy electron-atom scattering in a field of model potentials
IF 1.6 4区 物理与天体物理Journal of Physics B: Atomic, Molecular and Optical PhysicsPub Date : 1999-01-01 DOI: 10.1088/0953-4075/32/3/006
Joseph A Kunc
来源期刊
Early Childhood Education Journal
Early Childhood Education Journal EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH-
CiteScore
5.30
自引率
14.80%
发文量
124
期刊介绍: Early Childhood Education Journal is a professional publication of original peer-reviewed articles that reflect exemplary practices in the field of contemporary early childhood education. Articles cover the social, physical, emotional, and intellectual development of children age birth through 8, analyzing issues, trends, and practices from an educational perspective. The journal publishes feature-length articles that skillfully blend 1) theory, research, and practice, 2) descriptions of outstanding early childhood programs worldwide, and 3) quantitative, qualitative, and mixed-methods research. Early Childhood Education Journal is of interest not only to classroom teachers, child care providers, college and university faculty, and administrators, but also to other professionals in psychology, health care, family relations, and social services dedicated to the care of young children. Areas of Emphasis: International studies; Educational programs in diverse settings; Early learning across multiple domains; Projects demonstrating inter-professional collaboration; Qualitative and quantitative research and case studies; Best practices in early childhood teacher education; Theory, research, and practice relating to professional development; Family, school, and community relationships; Investigations related to curriculum and instruction; Articles that link theory and best practices; Reviews of research with well-articulated connections to the field
期刊最新文献
Young Children and Therapy Dogs in Schools: Guidelines for Educators STEAM in Early Childhood: An Analysis Towards Teachers’ and Children’s Perspectives Everyday Mathematical Activities of Babies and Toddlers in Early Childhood Education Settings Job Demands-Resources Profiles and Work Capabilities: Effects on Early Childhood Development Practitioners’ Functioning What Happened During Teacher Visits? A Closer Look at the Parent Engagement Effort of the HighScope Perry Preschool Project
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1