Enhancing daily runoff prediction: A hybrid model combining GR6J-CemaNeige with wavelet-based gradient boosting technique

IF 6.3 1区 地球科学 Q1 ENGINEERING, CIVIL Journal of Hydrology Pub Date : 2025-08-01 Epub Date: 2025-03-19 DOI:10.1016/j.jhydrol.2025.133114
Babak Mohammadi , Mingjie Chen , Mohammad Reza Nikoo , Ali Al-Maktoumi , Yang Yu , Ruide Yu
{"title":"Enhancing daily runoff prediction: A hybrid model combining GR6J-CemaNeige with wavelet-based gradient boosting technique","authors":"Babak Mohammadi ,&nbsp;Mingjie Chen ,&nbsp;Mohammad Reza Nikoo ,&nbsp;Ali Al-Maktoumi ,&nbsp;Yang Yu ,&nbsp;Ruide Yu","doi":"10.1016/j.jhydrol.2025.133114","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Hydrological modeling is essential for understanding and managing water resources, predicting flood events, and assessing the impacts of climate change on hydrological cycles. Previous research has shown the potential of machine learning (ML) models in hydrological modeling, but there remains a gap in effectively integrating these models with specific hydrological processes. This study addresses the challenges of runoff simulation in cold regions by systematically integrating Gradient Boosting Model (GBM) models with a hydrological process-based model (namely Génie Rural à 6 paramètres Journalier (GR6J) model coupled with CemaNeige snow module (GR6J-CemaNeige)) to improve hydrological modeling approaches. Four various schemes were examined for combining GBM with GR6J-CemaNeige, including production store combinations, unit hydrograph combinations, routing store concepts, and snowmelt and snowpack combinations. The GR6J-CemaNeige model achieved a Kling-Gupta Efficiency (KGE) of 0.775 and a Nash-Sutcliffe Efficiency (NSE) of 0.686 in the test sections, establishing a process-based baseline model for runoff simulation. The production store combinations yielded KGE values ranging from 0.722 to 0.745 and NSE from 0.601 to 0.614, while unit hydrograph combinations achieved KGE values of 0.8 and 0.804 and NSE values 0.702 and 0.705 during the test sections. The routing store combinations presented promising results with KGE values ranging from 0.805 to 0.822 and NSE values ranging from 0.71 to 0.734 for the test sections. Notably, the snowmelt and snowpack combinations achieved KGEs ranging from 0.743 to 0.759 and NSEs ranging from 0.641 to 0.666 during the test sections. The application of signal processing techniques, specifically Maximal Overlap Discrete Wavelet Transform (MWT) and Multiresolution Analysis (MRA), further improved runoff simulation accuracy across various hydrological components. The best MWT results were derived from the unit hydrograph scenario (MWT-GBM7), achieving a KGE of 0.881 and a NSE of 0.816 in the test section, demonstrating the technique’s effectiveness in capturing complex snow-related processes. For MRA, the routing store scenario (MRA-GBM9) produced the best results with a KGE of 0.881 and a NSE of 0.788 in the test section, highlighting the method’s capability to enhance the representation of runoff timing and distribution. The consistent improvement across different hydrological components suggests that the hybrid approach successfully captures complex interactions within the watershed.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":362,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Hydrology","volume":"657 ","pages":"Article 133114"},"PeriodicalIF":6.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Hydrology","FirstCategoryId":"89","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0022169425004524","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"地球科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/3/19 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, CIVIL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Hydrological modeling is essential for understanding and managing water resources, predicting flood events, and assessing the impacts of climate change on hydrological cycles. Previous research has shown the potential of machine learning (ML) models in hydrological modeling, but there remains a gap in effectively integrating these models with specific hydrological processes. This study addresses the challenges of runoff simulation in cold regions by systematically integrating Gradient Boosting Model (GBM) models with a hydrological process-based model (namely Génie Rural à 6 paramètres Journalier (GR6J) model coupled with CemaNeige snow module (GR6J-CemaNeige)) to improve hydrological modeling approaches. Four various schemes were examined for combining GBM with GR6J-CemaNeige, including production store combinations, unit hydrograph combinations, routing store concepts, and snowmelt and snowpack combinations. The GR6J-CemaNeige model achieved a Kling-Gupta Efficiency (KGE) of 0.775 and a Nash-Sutcliffe Efficiency (NSE) of 0.686 in the test sections, establishing a process-based baseline model for runoff simulation. The production store combinations yielded KGE values ranging from 0.722 to 0.745 and NSE from 0.601 to 0.614, while unit hydrograph combinations achieved KGE values of 0.8 and 0.804 and NSE values 0.702 and 0.705 during the test sections. The routing store combinations presented promising results with KGE values ranging from 0.805 to 0.822 and NSE values ranging from 0.71 to 0.734 for the test sections. Notably, the snowmelt and snowpack combinations achieved KGEs ranging from 0.743 to 0.759 and NSEs ranging from 0.641 to 0.666 during the test sections. The application of signal processing techniques, specifically Maximal Overlap Discrete Wavelet Transform (MWT) and Multiresolution Analysis (MRA), further improved runoff simulation accuracy across various hydrological components. The best MWT results were derived from the unit hydrograph scenario (MWT-GBM7), achieving a KGE of 0.881 and a NSE of 0.816 in the test section, demonstrating the technique’s effectiveness in capturing complex snow-related processes. For MRA, the routing store scenario (MRA-GBM9) produced the best results with a KGE of 0.881 and a NSE of 0.788 in the test section, highlighting the method’s capability to enhance the representation of runoff timing and distribution. The consistent improvement across different hydrological components suggests that the hybrid approach successfully captures complex interactions within the watershed.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
增强日径流预测:GR6J-CemaNeige与小波梯度增强技术相结合的混合模型
水文建模对于理解和管理水资源、预测洪水事件以及评估气候变化对水文循环的影响至关重要。之前的研究已经显示了机器学习(ML)模型在水文建模中的潜力,但在将这些模型与特定水文过程有效整合方面仍然存在差距。本研究通过系统地将梯度增强模型(Gradient Boosting Model, GBM)模型与基于水文过程的模型(即gsamnie Rural 6 param Journalier (GR6J)模型与CemaNeige雪模块(GR6J-CemaNeige)相结合,改进水文建模方法,解决了寒冷地区径流模拟的挑战。研究了GBM与GR6J-CemaNeige相结合的4种方案,包括生产库组合、单位水文组合、路由库概念、融雪和积雪组合。GR6J-CemaNeige模型在试验段的Kling-Gupta效率(KGE)为0.775,Nash-Sutcliffe效率(NSE)为0.686,建立了基于过程的径流模拟基线模型。生产库组合的KGE值为0.722 ~ 0.745,NSE值为0.601 ~ 0.614,而单元线组合的KGE值为0.8 ~ 0.804,NSE值为0.702 ~ 0.705。路由存储组合显示出令人满意的结果,测试部分的KGE值在0.805至0.822之间,NSE值在0.71至0.734之间。值得注意的是,在试验段,融雪和积雪组合的KGEs在0.743 ~ 0.759之间,nse在0.641 ~ 0.666之间。信号处理技术的应用,特别是最大重叠离散小波变换(MWT)和多分辨率分析(MRA),进一步提高了各种水文成分的径流模拟精度。最佳的MWT结果来自于单位水文情景(MWT- gbm7),在测试剖面中实现了0.881的KGE和0.816的NSE,证明了该技术在捕获复杂的雪相关过程中的有效性。对于MRA,路由存储场景(MRA- gbm9)在测试部分产生了最好的结果,KGE为0.881,NSE为0.788,突出了该方法增强径流时序和分布表征的能力。不同水文成分的持续改善表明,混合方法成功地捕获了流域内复杂的相互作用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Hydrology
Journal of Hydrology 地学-地球科学综合
CiteScore
11.00
自引率
12.50%
发文量
1309
审稿时长
7.5 months
期刊介绍: The Journal of Hydrology publishes original research papers and comprehensive reviews in all the subfields of the hydrological sciences including water based management and policy issues that impact on economics and society. These comprise, but are not limited to the physical, chemical, biogeochemical, stochastic and systems aspects of surface and groundwater hydrology, hydrometeorology and hydrogeology. Relevant topics incorporating the insights and methodologies of disciplines such as climatology, water resource systems, hydraulics, agrohydrology, geomorphology, soil science, instrumentation and remote sensing, civil and environmental engineering are included. Social science perspectives on hydrological problems such as resource and ecological economics, environmental sociology, psychology and behavioural science, management and policy analysis are also invited. Multi-and interdisciplinary analyses of hydrological problems are within scope. The science published in the Journal of Hydrology is relevant to catchment scales rather than exclusively to a local scale or site.
期刊最新文献
High-resolution modelling of dissolved organic carbon dynamics in a boreal nested catchment: insights from the Krycklan-HYPE model The impact of data quality and outlier detection in high-frequency water quality data on water management and process understanding Linear time-lag effects and nonlinear interactions of global drought-flood abrupt alternation in responses to multiple factors Hydrological effects of vegetation greenness change in China: a first-order assessment of the role of moisture recycling Soil water vapor adsorption and condensation governed by groundwater depth and vadose zone lithology in arid and semi-arid regions
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1