Care guided by tissue oxygenation and haemodynamic monitoring in off-pump coronary artery bypass grafting (Bottomline-CS): assessor blind, single centre, randomised controlled trial

The BMJ Pub Date : 2025-03-24 DOI:10.1136/bmj-2024-082104
Jiange Han, Wenqian Zhai, Zhenhua Wu, Zhao Zhang, Tao Wang, Min Ren, Ziyue Liu, Daniel I Sessler, Zhigang Guo, Lingzhong Meng, the Bottomline-CS investigation group
{"title":"Care guided by tissue oxygenation and haemodynamic monitoring in off-pump coronary artery bypass grafting (Bottomline-CS): assessor blind, single centre, randomised controlled trial","authors":"Jiange Han, Wenqian Zhai, Zhenhua Wu, Zhao Zhang, Tao Wang, Min Ren, Ziyue Liu, Daniel I Sessler, Zhigang Guo, Lingzhong Meng, the Bottomline-CS investigation group","doi":"10.1136/bmj-2024-082104","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objective To assess whether perioperative management guided by near-infrared spectroscopy to determine tissue oxygen saturation and haemodynamic monitoring reduces postoperative complications after off-pump coronary artery bypass grafting. Design Assessor blinded, single centre, randomised controlled trial (Bottomline-CS trial). Setting A tertiary teaching hospital in China. Participants 1960 patients aged 60 years or older who were scheduled for elective off-pump coronary artery bypass grafting. Interventions All patients had multisite monitoring of tissue oxygen saturation (bilateral forehead and unilateral forearm brachioradialis) and haemodynamic monitoring. Both groups received usual care, including arterial blood pressure, central venous pressure, electrocardiography, and transoesophageal echocardiography when indicated. Guided care aimed to maintain tissue oxygenation within 10% above or below preoperative baseline values, established 24-48 hours before surgery, from the start of anaesthesia until extubation or for up to 24 hours postoperatively. In the usual care group, tissue oximetry and haemodynamic data were concealed, and care was routine. Main outcome measures The primary outcome was the incidence of a composite of 30 day postoperative complications, which were cerebral, cardiac, respiratory, renal, infectious, and mortality complications. Secondary outcomes included the individual components of the composite outcome, new-onset atrial fibrillation, and hospital length of stay. Results Of 1960 patients randomly assigned, data from 967 guided care and 974 usual care patients were analysed. During anaesthesia, the area under the curve for tissue oxygen saturation measurements outside the plus and minus 10% baseline range was significantly smaller with guided care than only usual care: left forehead 32.4 versus 57.6 (%×min, P<0.001), right forehead 37.9 versus 62.6 (P<0.001), and forearm 14.8 versus 44.7 (P<0.001). The primary composite outcome occurred in 457/967 (47.3%) patients in the guided care group and 466/974 (47.8%) patients in the usual care group (unadjusted risk ratio 0.99 (95% confidence interval 0.90 to 1.08), P=0.83). No secondary outcomes differed significantly between groups. The largest observed difference was in incidence of pneumonia, which was less frequent in the guided care group (88/967, 9.1%) than in the usual care group (121/974, 12.4%) and not statistically significant after adjusting for multiple comparisons. Conclusions Guided care by use of multisite near-infrared spectroscopy and haemodynamic monitoring effectively maintained tissue oxygenation near baseline levels compared with usual care. However, no clear evidence was noted that this approach reduced the incidence of major postoperative complications. These findings do not support the routine use of near-infrared spectroscopy and haemodynamic monitoring to maintain tissue oxygenation during off-pump coronary artery bypass grafting. Trial registration ClinicalTrials.gov [NCT04896736][1]. The code used to analyse the data in the paper can be found in the supplemental files. The data underlying the findings in this paper are openly and publicly available and can be found here: (DOI: 10.5061/dryad.z34tmpgqz). If you encounter problems accessing the data, please contact the corresponding author. [1]: /lookup/external-ref?link_type=CLINTRIALGOV&access_num=NCT04896736&atom=%2Fbmj%2F388%2Fbmj-2024-082104.atom","PeriodicalId":22388,"journal":{"name":"The BMJ","volume":"71 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The BMJ","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj-2024-082104","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective To assess whether perioperative management guided by near-infrared spectroscopy to determine tissue oxygen saturation and haemodynamic monitoring reduces postoperative complications after off-pump coronary artery bypass grafting. Design Assessor blinded, single centre, randomised controlled trial (Bottomline-CS trial). Setting A tertiary teaching hospital in China. Participants 1960 patients aged 60 years or older who were scheduled for elective off-pump coronary artery bypass grafting. Interventions All patients had multisite monitoring of tissue oxygen saturation (bilateral forehead and unilateral forearm brachioradialis) and haemodynamic monitoring. Both groups received usual care, including arterial blood pressure, central venous pressure, electrocardiography, and transoesophageal echocardiography when indicated. Guided care aimed to maintain tissue oxygenation within 10% above or below preoperative baseline values, established 24-48 hours before surgery, from the start of anaesthesia until extubation or for up to 24 hours postoperatively. In the usual care group, tissue oximetry and haemodynamic data were concealed, and care was routine. Main outcome measures The primary outcome was the incidence of a composite of 30 day postoperative complications, which were cerebral, cardiac, respiratory, renal, infectious, and mortality complications. Secondary outcomes included the individual components of the composite outcome, new-onset atrial fibrillation, and hospital length of stay. Results Of 1960 patients randomly assigned, data from 967 guided care and 974 usual care patients were analysed. During anaesthesia, the area under the curve for tissue oxygen saturation measurements outside the plus and minus 10% baseline range was significantly smaller with guided care than only usual care: left forehead 32.4 versus 57.6 (%×min, P<0.001), right forehead 37.9 versus 62.6 (P<0.001), and forearm 14.8 versus 44.7 (P<0.001). The primary composite outcome occurred in 457/967 (47.3%) patients in the guided care group and 466/974 (47.8%) patients in the usual care group (unadjusted risk ratio 0.99 (95% confidence interval 0.90 to 1.08), P=0.83). No secondary outcomes differed significantly between groups. The largest observed difference was in incidence of pneumonia, which was less frequent in the guided care group (88/967, 9.1%) than in the usual care group (121/974, 12.4%) and not statistically significant after adjusting for multiple comparisons. Conclusions Guided care by use of multisite near-infrared spectroscopy and haemodynamic monitoring effectively maintained tissue oxygenation near baseline levels compared with usual care. However, no clear evidence was noted that this approach reduced the incidence of major postoperative complications. These findings do not support the routine use of near-infrared spectroscopy and haemodynamic monitoring to maintain tissue oxygenation during off-pump coronary artery bypass grafting. Trial registration ClinicalTrials.gov [NCT04896736][1]. The code used to analyse the data in the paper can be found in the supplemental files. The data underlying the findings in this paper are openly and publicly available and can be found here: (DOI: 10.5061/dryad.z34tmpgqz). If you encounter problems accessing the data, please contact the corresponding author. [1]: /lookup/external-ref?link_type=CLINTRIALGOV&access_num=NCT04896736&atom=%2Fbmj%2F388%2Fbmj-2024-082104.atom
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
非体外循环冠状动脉旁路移植术中组织氧合和血流动力学监测指导下的护理(底线- cs):评估盲、单中心、随机对照试验
目的探讨近红外光谱检测组织血氧饱和度及血流动力学监测指导下围手术期管理能否减少非体外循环冠状动脉搭桥术术后并发症的发生。设计评估者盲法、单中心、随机对照试验(Bottomline-CS试验)。中国三级教学医院。参与者为1960例60岁或以上的患者,他们计划进行非体外循环冠状动脉旁路移植术。所有患者均进行多部位组织血氧饱和度监测(双侧前额和单侧前臂肱桡肌)和血流动力学监测。两组均接受常规护理,包括动脉血压、中心静脉压、心电图和经食管超声心动图。指导护理旨在将组织氧合维持在术前24-48小时基线值以上或以下10%的范围内,从麻醉开始到拔管或术后24小时。常规护理组隐匿组织血氧仪和血流动力学数据,常规护理。主要结局指标主要结局指标为术后30天并发症的复合发生率,包括脑、心、呼吸、肾、感染和死亡并发症。次要结局包括复合结局的个别组成部分、新发房颤和住院时间。结果随机选取1960例患者,分析967例引导式护理患者和974例常规护理患者的资料。在麻醉期间,指导护理下的组织氧饱和度曲线下面积在正负10%基线范围外明显小于常规护理:左前额32.4比57.6 (%×min, P<0.001),右前额37.9比62.6 (P<0.001),前臂14.8比44.7 (P<0.001)。指导护理组457/967例(47.3%)患者和常规护理组466/974例(47.8%)患者出现主要复合结局(未调整风险比0.99(95%可信区间0.90 ~ 1.08),P=0.83)。各组间次要结局无显著差异。观察差异最大的是肺炎的发生率,指导护理组的肺炎发生率(88/967,9.1%)低于常规护理组(121/974,12.4%),经多重比较调整后差异无统计学意义。结论与常规护理相比,采用多点近红外光谱和血流动力学监测的指导护理能有效地维持组织氧合接近基线水平。然而,没有明确的证据表明该入路降低了主要术后并发症的发生率。这些发现不支持常规使用近红外光谱和血流动力学监测来维持非体外循环冠状动脉旁路移植术期间的组织氧合。临床试验注册:ClinicalTrials.gov [NCT04896736][1]。用于分析论文数据的代码可在补充文件中找到。本文中发现的数据是公开的,可以在这里找到:(DOI: 10.5061/dryad.z34tmpgqz)。如果您在访问数据时遇到问题,请与通讯作者联系。[1]: /查找/ external-ref ? link_type = CLINTRIALGOV&access_num = NCT04896736&atom = % 2 fbmj % 2 f388 % 2 fbmj - 2024 - 082104. -原子
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Consultants demand action to protect their freedom of speech in wake of Abu-Sitta case. Iran: WHO calls for protection for health workers as conflict sweeps the Middle East. UKRI's funding reforms: universities and researchers should be valued collaborators, not an afterthought. NHS England defines "corridor care" for first time. Trump's glyphosate order infuriates MAHA movement, leaving RFK Jr exposed.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1