Soil resource acquisition strategy modulates global plant nutrient and water economics

IF 8.1 1区 生物学 Q1 PLANT SCIENCES New Phytologist Pub Date : 2025-03-23 DOI:10.1111/nph.70087
Alissar Cheaib, Jeff Chieppa, Evan A. Perkowski, Nicholas G. Smith
{"title":"Soil resource acquisition strategy modulates global plant nutrient and water economics","authors":"Alissar Cheaib,&nbsp;Jeff Chieppa,&nbsp;Evan A. Perkowski,&nbsp;Nicholas G. Smith","doi":"10.1111/nph.70087","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n <p>\n </p><ul>\n \n <li>Natural selection favors growth by selecting a combination of plant traits that maximize photosynthetic CO<sub>2</sub> assimilation at the lowest combined carbon costs of resource acquisition and use. We quantified how soil nutrient availability, plant nutrient acquisition strategies, and aridity modulate the variability in plant costs of nutrient acquisition relative to water acquisition (β).</li>\n \n <li>We used an eco-evolutionary optimality framework and a global carbon isotope dataset to quantify β.</li>\n \n <li>Under low soil nitrogen-to-carbon (N : C) ratios, a mining strategy (symbioses with ectomycorrhizal and ericoid mycorrhizal fungi) reduced β by mining organic nitrogen, compared with a scavenging strategy (symbioses with arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi). Conversely, under high N : C ratios, scavenging strategies reduced β by effectively scavenging soluble nitrogen, compared with mining strategies. N<sub>2</sub>-fixing plants did not exhibit reduced β under low N : C ratios compared with non-N<sub>2</sub>-fixing plants. Moisture increased β only in plants using a scavenging strategy, reflecting direct impacts of aridity on the carbon costs of maintaining transpiration in these plants. Nitrogen and phosphorus colimitation further modulated β.</li>\n \n <li>Our findings provide a framework for simulating the variability of plant economics due to plant nutrient acquisition strategies in earth system models.</li>\n </ul>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":214,"journal":{"name":"New Phytologist","volume":"246 4","pages":"1536-1553"},"PeriodicalIF":8.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"New Phytologist","FirstCategoryId":"99","ListUrlMain":"https://nph.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/nph.70087","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PLANT SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

  • Natural selection favors growth by selecting a combination of plant traits that maximize photosynthetic CO2 assimilation at the lowest combined carbon costs of resource acquisition and use. We quantified how soil nutrient availability, plant nutrient acquisition strategies, and aridity modulate the variability in plant costs of nutrient acquisition relative to water acquisition (β).
  • We used an eco-evolutionary optimality framework and a global carbon isotope dataset to quantify β.
  • Under low soil nitrogen-to-carbon (N : C) ratios, a mining strategy (symbioses with ectomycorrhizal and ericoid mycorrhizal fungi) reduced β by mining organic nitrogen, compared with a scavenging strategy (symbioses with arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi). Conversely, under high N : C ratios, scavenging strategies reduced β by effectively scavenging soluble nitrogen, compared with mining strategies. N2-fixing plants did not exhibit reduced β under low N : C ratios compared with non-N2-fixing plants. Moisture increased β only in plants using a scavenging strategy, reflecting direct impacts of aridity on the carbon costs of maintaining transpiration in these plants. Nitrogen and phosphorus colimitation further modulated β.
  • Our findings provide a framework for simulating the variability of plant economics due to plant nutrient acquisition strategies in earth system models.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
土壤资源获取策略调节全球植物养分和水分经济
自然选择通过选择植物性状的组合来促进生长,这些性状以最低的资源获取和利用的综合碳成本最大化光合CO2同化。我们量化了土壤养分有效性、植物养分获取策略和干旱如何调节相对于水分获取的植物养分获取成本的变化(β)。我们使用生态进化最优框架和全球碳同位素数据集来量化β。在低土壤氮碳比(N: C)条件下,与清除策略(与丛枝菌根真菌共生)相比,挖掘策略(与外生菌根真菌和ericoid菌根真菌共生)通过挖掘有机氮减少β。相反,在高氮碳比条件下,与采矿策略相比,清除策略通过有效清除可溶性氮来降低β。与非固氮植物相比,固氮植物在低氮碳比下没有表现出β的减少。水分增加β仅在采用清除策略的植物中,反映了干旱对这些植物维持蒸腾的碳成本的直接影响。氮和磷的协同作用进一步调节了β。我们的研究结果为模拟地球系统模型中植物养分获取策略引起的植物经济变异性提供了一个框架。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
New Phytologist
New Phytologist 生物-植物科学
自引率
5.30%
发文量
728
期刊介绍: New Phytologist is an international electronic journal published 24 times a year. It is owned by the New Phytologist Foundation, a non-profit-making charitable organization dedicated to promoting plant science. The journal publishes excellent, novel, rigorous, and timely research and scholarship in plant science and its applications. The articles cover topics in five sections: Physiology & Development, Environment, Interaction, Evolution, and Transformative Plant Biotechnology. These sections encompass intracellular processes, global environmental change, and encourage cross-disciplinary approaches. The journal recognizes the use of techniques from molecular and cell biology, functional genomics, modeling, and system-based approaches in plant science. Abstracting and Indexing Information for New Phytologist includes Academic Search, AgBiotech News & Information, Agroforestry Abstracts, Biochemistry & Biophysics Citation Index, Botanical Pesticides, CAB Abstracts®, Environment Index, Global Health, and Plant Breeding Abstracts, and others.
期刊最新文献
Efficient and accurate prime editing system in plants. Corrigendum to 'Off-target drift of the herbicide dicamba disrupts plant-pollinator interactions via novel pathways'. ZmMPK5-mediated ZmOCL1 phosphorylation positively regulates drought tolerance by promoting the induction of ZmDHN2 in maize. Fungal ecology in the age of 'omics. Canalized to heat, plastic to cold: adaptive coordination of leaf and seed strategies in populations spanning an elevational gradient.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1