Human midfacial growth pattern differs from that of Neanderthals and chimpanzees

IF 3.1 1区 地球科学 Q1 ANTHROPOLOGY Journal of Human Evolution Pub Date : 2025-03-24 DOI:10.1016/j.jhevol.2025.103667
Alexandra Schuh , Philipp Gunz , Chiara Villa , Bruno Maureille , Michel Toussaint , Grégory Abrams , Jean-Jacques Hublin , Sarah E. Freidline
{"title":"Human midfacial growth pattern differs from that of Neanderthals and chimpanzees","authors":"Alexandra Schuh ,&nbsp;Philipp Gunz ,&nbsp;Chiara Villa ,&nbsp;Bruno Maureille ,&nbsp;Michel Toussaint ,&nbsp;Grégory Abrams ,&nbsp;Jean-Jacques Hublin ,&nbsp;Sarah E. Freidline","doi":"10.1016/j.jhevol.2025.103667","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Present-day humans have small and retracted midfaces, while Neanderthals possess large and forwardly projected midfaces. To understand the ontogenetic patterns underlying these characteristic morphologies, we compared maxillary growth and development from birth to adulthood in present-day humans (<em>Homo sapiens</em>; <em>n</em> = 128), Neanderthals (<em>Homo neanderthalensis</em>; <em>n</em> = 13), and chimpanzees (<em>Pan troglodytes verus</em>; <em>n</em> = 33) using macroscopic (i.e., geometric morphometrics) and microscopic (i.e., surface histology) approaches. Using geometric morphometrics to quantify macroscopic patterns of growth and development, we found that the midfaces of present-day humans are on average already smaller at birth than those of Neanderthals and grow more slowly after birth. In particular, we find an early cessation of growth around adolescence, which is unique to our species. Microscopically, this is reflected in reduced amounts of bone resorption, indicative of decreased cellular activities linked to bone development. Greater amounts of bone formation in the infraorbital and nasal regions and faster growth rates are responsible for the large Neanderthal midface. These results highlight the importance of postnatal ontogeny (especially in late stages) for explaining facial differences between Neanderthals and present-day humans, as well as part of the gracilization process characteristic of present-day humans.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":54805,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Human Evolution","volume":"202 ","pages":"Article 103667"},"PeriodicalIF":3.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Human Evolution","FirstCategoryId":"89","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S004724842500020X","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"地球科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ANTHROPOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Present-day humans have small and retracted midfaces, while Neanderthals possess large and forwardly projected midfaces. To understand the ontogenetic patterns underlying these characteristic morphologies, we compared maxillary growth and development from birth to adulthood in present-day humans (Homo sapiens; n = 128), Neanderthals (Homo neanderthalensis; n = 13), and chimpanzees (Pan troglodytes verus; n = 33) using macroscopic (i.e., geometric morphometrics) and microscopic (i.e., surface histology) approaches. Using geometric morphometrics to quantify macroscopic patterns of growth and development, we found that the midfaces of present-day humans are on average already smaller at birth than those of Neanderthals and grow more slowly after birth. In particular, we find an early cessation of growth around adolescence, which is unique to our species. Microscopically, this is reflected in reduced amounts of bone resorption, indicative of decreased cellular activities linked to bone development. Greater amounts of bone formation in the infraorbital and nasal regions and faster growth rates are responsible for the large Neanderthal midface. These results highlight the importance of postnatal ontogeny (especially in late stages) for explaining facial differences between Neanderthals and present-day humans, as well as part of the gracilization process characteristic of present-day humans.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
人类面部中部的生长模式不同于尼安德特人和黑猩猩
现代人类的中脸小而向后缩,而尼安德特人的中脸大而向前突出。为了了解这些特征形态背后的个体发生模式,我们比较了现代人类(智人;n = 128),尼安德特人(Homo neanderthalensis;n = 13),黑猩猩(Pan troglodytes verus;N = 33),采用宏观(即几何形态计量学)和微观(即表面组织学)方法。使用几何形态计量学来量化生长和发育的宏观模式,我们发现现代人的中脸在出生时平均已经比尼安德特人小,出生后增长更慢。特别是,我们发现青春期前后生长会提前停止,这是人类独有的。显微镜下,这反映在骨吸收量减少,表明与骨发育有关的细胞活动减少。在眶下和鼻区有大量的骨骼形成,生长速度更快,这是尼安德特人中脸较大的原因。这些结果强调了出生后个体发育(特别是在后期)对于解释尼安德特人和现代人之间面部差异的重要性,以及现代人特征的部分纤体化过程。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Human Evolution
Journal of Human Evolution 生物-进化生物学
CiteScore
6.30
自引率
15.60%
发文量
104
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: The Journal of Human Evolution concentrates on publishing the highest quality papers covering all aspects of human evolution. The central focus is aimed jointly at paleoanthropological work, covering human and primate fossils, and at comparative studies of living species, including both morphological and molecular evidence. These include descriptions of new discoveries, interpretative analyses of new and previously described material, and assessments of the phylogeny and paleobiology of primate species. Submissions should address issues and questions of broad interest in paleoanthropology.
期刊最新文献
The dentognathic material of the Neanderthals from Chagyrskaya (Altai, Russia): Morphology and paleobiology. The axis (C2) from El Sidrón and its implications for Neanderthal upper cervical spine form. Endurance pursuit hunting among recent foragers and its relevance for hominin locomotor evolution Editorial Board Reconstructing dietary preferences in the Middle Pleistocene Sima de los Huesos population: A molar macrowear perspective
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1