Navigating the complex dynamics of human-automation driving: A guide to the use of the dynamical systems analysis (DSA) toolbox

IF 2.4 3区 心理学 Q3 COMPUTER SCIENCE, ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE Cognitive Systems Research Pub Date : 2025-03-11 DOI:10.1016/j.cogsys.2025.101347
Tri Nguyen , Corey Magaldino , Jayci Landfair , Polemnia G. Amazeen , Mustafa Demir , Lixiao Huang , Nancy Cooke
{"title":"Navigating the complex dynamics of human-automation driving: A guide to the use of the dynamical systems analysis (DSA) toolbox","authors":"Tri Nguyen ,&nbsp;Corey Magaldino ,&nbsp;Jayci Landfair ,&nbsp;Polemnia G. Amazeen ,&nbsp;Mustafa Demir ,&nbsp;Lixiao Huang ,&nbsp;Nancy Cooke","doi":"10.1016/j.cogsys.2025.101347","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Driver-environment-automation systems exhibit a wide range of distinctive behavioral patterns that organically arise from complex interactions. To understand and quantify their emergence, we examined the nested underlying processes that contribute to observable behavior using three dynamical systems analyses: multifractal detrended fluctuation analysis (MFDFA), recurrence quantification analysis (RQA), and wavelet coherence analysis (WCT). As a technical demonstration of how to utilize multiple nonlinear analyses to probe multivariate data, we explain the appropriateness of each analysis for each stage of discovery, the information each provides, and the application of that information to driving. Results revealed that driving behaviors are influenced by both long-range (e.g., decision-making) and short-range (e.g., reaction time) processes whose relative contribution differs for the easier straight sections and more challenging S-curve sections of the track. The discussed methods provide information about (a) the timescale at which driving behaviors are being coordinated with environmental and automation considerations and (b) the time points where peak coordination is localized. This paper illustrates and empirically examines the utility of the Dynamical Systems Analysis (DSA) toolbox in understanding the behaviors of complex systems and highlights important considerations for researchers seeking to utilize this approach in their research.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":55242,"journal":{"name":"Cognitive Systems Research","volume":"91 ","pages":"Article 101347"},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cognitive Systems Research","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1389041725000270","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"COMPUTER SCIENCE, ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Driver-environment-automation systems exhibit a wide range of distinctive behavioral patterns that organically arise from complex interactions. To understand and quantify their emergence, we examined the nested underlying processes that contribute to observable behavior using three dynamical systems analyses: multifractal detrended fluctuation analysis (MFDFA), recurrence quantification analysis (RQA), and wavelet coherence analysis (WCT). As a technical demonstration of how to utilize multiple nonlinear analyses to probe multivariate data, we explain the appropriateness of each analysis for each stage of discovery, the information each provides, and the application of that information to driving. Results revealed that driving behaviors are influenced by both long-range (e.g., decision-making) and short-range (e.g., reaction time) processes whose relative contribution differs for the easier straight sections and more challenging S-curve sections of the track. The discussed methods provide information about (a) the timescale at which driving behaviors are being coordinated with environmental and automation considerations and (b) the time points where peak coordination is localized. This paper illustrates and empirically examines the utility of the Dynamical Systems Analysis (DSA) toolbox in understanding the behaviors of complex systems and highlights important considerations for researchers seeking to utilize this approach in their research.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
驾驭人机交互驾驶的复杂动态:动态系统分析(DSA)工具箱使用指南
驾驶员-环境-自动化系统表现出一系列独特的行为模式,这些行为模式是由复杂的相互作用有机产生的。为了理解和量化它们的出现,我们使用三种动力系统分析:多重分形去趋势波动分析(MFDFA)、递归量化分析(RQA)和小波相干分析(WCT),研究了导致可观察行为的嵌套潜在过程。作为如何利用多种非线性分析来探测多元数据的技术演示,我们解释了每种分析对每个发现阶段的适用性,每种分析提供的信息,以及该信息在驾驶中的应用。结果表明,驾驶行为同时受到长程过程(如决策过程)和短程过程(如反应时间过程)的影响,两者的相对贡献在较容易的直线路段和较困难的s曲线路段有所不同。所讨论的方法提供了关于(a)驾驶行为与环境和自动化因素协调的时间尺度和(b)峰值协调的时间点的信息。本文说明和实证检验了动力系统分析(DSA)工具箱在理解复杂系统行为方面的效用,并强调了在研究中寻求利用这种方法的研究人员的重要考虑因素。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Cognitive Systems Research
Cognitive Systems Research 工程技术-计算机:人工智能
CiteScore
9.40
自引率
5.10%
发文量
40
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Cognitive Systems Research is dedicated to the study of human-level cognition. As such, it welcomes papers which advance the understanding, design and applications of cognitive and intelligent systems, both natural and artificial. The journal brings together a broad community studying cognition in its many facets in vivo and in silico, across the developmental spectrum, focusing on individual capacities or on entire architectures. It aims to foster debate and integrate ideas, concepts, constructs, theories, models and techniques from across different disciplines and different perspectives on human-level cognition. The scope of interest includes the study of cognitive capacities and architectures - both brain-inspired and non-brain-inspired - and the application of cognitive systems to real-world problems as far as it offers insights relevant for the understanding of cognition. Cognitive Systems Research therefore welcomes mature and cutting-edge research approaching cognition from a systems-oriented perspective, both theoretical and empirically-informed, in the form of original manuscripts, short communications, opinion articles, systematic reviews, and topical survey articles from the fields of Cognitive Science (including Philosophy of Cognitive Science), Artificial Intelligence/Computer Science, Cognitive Robotics, Developmental Science, Psychology, and Neuroscience and Neuromorphic Engineering. Empirical studies will be considered if they are supplemented by theoretical analyses and contributions to theory development and/or computational modelling studies.
期刊最新文献
Optimising blockchain security: Computational analysis of adaptive AI coaching Rethinking rationality and intelligence: Humans versus machines Epigenetic Influences in Aberrant Salience and Reality Testing in Schizoaffective Disorder: A Multi-Level Adaptive Network Modelling Approach Editorial Board Probing the reasoning abilities of LLMs in blocks world
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1