Latent profiles of perfectionism, unconditional self-acceptance, strengths use, and deficit correction: Associations with well-being in South Korean undergraduates

IF 2.6 2区 心理学 Q1 PSYCHOLOGY, SOCIAL Personality and Individual Differences Pub Date : 2025-03-24 DOI:10.1016/j.paid.2025.113154
Hyoyeon In
{"title":"Latent profiles of perfectionism, unconditional self-acceptance, strengths use, and deficit correction: Associations with well-being in South Korean undergraduates","authors":"Hyoyeon In","doi":"10.1016/j.paid.2025.113154","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>As a multidimensional trait, perfectionism has been classified by its two core dimensions. However, less is known about how other meaningful perceptions and behaviors manifest in perfectionist profiles. This study aimed to identify subgroups based on perfectionism dimensions (standards, discrepancy), unconditional self-acceptance (USA), strengths use, and deficit correction and to examine their associations with well-being in a sample of 399 undergraduates in South Korea. Latent profile analysis identified three subgroups: self-accepted perfectionists (39.3 %), non-perfectionists (32.4 %), and deficit-focused perfectionists (28.3 %). These profiles largely align with the 3-class model of perfectionism and reveal additional patterns of USA, strengths use, and deficit correction. The self-accepted perfectionists, characterized by high standards and low discrepancy, along with high USA and active engagement with strengths use and deficit correction, demonstrated the most adaptive outcomes in terms of flourishing and positive/negative affect. The deficit-focused perfectionists reported higher flourishing than the non-perfectionists and exhibited the highest negative affect. Findings suggest that self-acceptance and such proactive behaviors as strengths use and deficit correction help to understand unique characteristics and outcomes of perfectionist subgroups and warrant further research in diverse contexts.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48467,"journal":{"name":"Personality and Individual Differences","volume":"240 ","pages":"Article 113154"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Personality and Individual Differences","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0191886925001163","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, SOCIAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

As a multidimensional trait, perfectionism has been classified by its two core dimensions. However, less is known about how other meaningful perceptions and behaviors manifest in perfectionist profiles. This study aimed to identify subgroups based on perfectionism dimensions (standards, discrepancy), unconditional self-acceptance (USA), strengths use, and deficit correction and to examine their associations with well-being in a sample of 399 undergraduates in South Korea. Latent profile analysis identified three subgroups: self-accepted perfectionists (39.3 %), non-perfectionists (32.4 %), and deficit-focused perfectionists (28.3 %). These profiles largely align with the 3-class model of perfectionism and reveal additional patterns of USA, strengths use, and deficit correction. The self-accepted perfectionists, characterized by high standards and low discrepancy, along with high USA and active engagement with strengths use and deficit correction, demonstrated the most adaptive outcomes in terms of flourishing and positive/negative affect. The deficit-focused perfectionists reported higher flourishing than the non-perfectionists and exhibited the highest negative affect. Findings suggest that self-acceptance and such proactive behaviors as strengths use and deficit correction help to understand unique characteristics and outcomes of perfectionist subgroups and warrant further research in diverse contexts.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
完美主义、无条件自我接纳、优势利用和缺陷矫正的潜在特征:韩国大学生的完美主义与幸福感的关系
完美主义作为一种多维度的特质,被分为两个核心维度。然而,对于完美主义者的其他有意义的感知和行为是如何表现出来的,我们知之甚少。本研究旨在确定基于完美主义维度(标准、差异)、无条件自我接纳(美国)、优势利用和缺陷纠正的子群体,并在韩国399名大学生中检验它们与幸福感的关系。潜在轮廓分析确定了三个亚组:自我接受的完美主义者(39.3%),非完美主义者(32.4%)和缺陷关注的完美主义者(28.3%)。这些特征在很大程度上与完美主义的三级模型一致,并揭示了美国、优势利用和缺陷纠正的其他模式。自我接纳的完美主义者,其特点是高标准和低差异,以及高USA和积极参与优势使用和缺陷纠正,在繁荣和积极/消极影响方面表现出最适应性的结果。以缺陷为中心的完美主义者比非完美主义者表现出更高的幸福感,并表现出最高的负面情绪。研究结果表明,自我接纳和诸如优势利用和缺陷纠正等主动行为有助于理解完美主义亚群体的独特特征和结果,值得在不同背景下进一步研究。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
8.50
自引率
4.70%
发文量
577
审稿时长
41 days
期刊介绍: Personality and Individual Differences is devoted to the publication of articles (experimental, theoretical, review) which aim to integrate as far as possible the major factors of personality with empirical paradigms from experimental, physiological, animal, clinical, educational, criminological or industrial psychology or to seek an explanation for the causes and major determinants of individual differences in concepts derived from these disciplines. The editors are concerned with both genetic and environmental causes, and they are particularly interested in possible interaction effects.
期刊最新文献
Dark Triad traits, materialism, and buy now, pay later (BNPL) Mapping bridges between movie preferences, normal-range, and pathological personality traits through network analysis Ego and academic ethics: A brief investigation into the associations among three facets of narcissism, academic entitlement, and academic dishonesty Individual differences in intelligence and personality guide human social learning A scoping review of kindness measurement tools
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1