The impact of human-elephant conflicts on farm households’ land lease behavior: The case of Yunnan Province, China

IF 5.9 1区 社会学 Q1 ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES Land Use Policy Pub Date : 2025-06-01 Epub Date: 2025-03-24 DOI:10.1016/j.landusepol.2025.107532
Xian Liang , Tianyu Chen , Hui Xiao , Yi Xie
{"title":"The impact of human-elephant conflicts on farm households’ land lease behavior: The case of Yunnan Province, China","authors":"Xian Liang ,&nbsp;Tianyu Chen ,&nbsp;Hui Xiao ,&nbsp;Yi Xie","doi":"10.1016/j.landusepol.2025.107532","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>In recent years, the persistent interactions between Asian elephants and agricultural communities have posed significant challenges to the livelihoods of farmers as well as the utilization of their land resources. This study analyzed whether and how the Human-Elephant Conflicts (HEC) affected the land lease behavior of the farm households using a sample of 915 farm households in 9 counties of Yunnan Province, China, in 2022. The Bivariate Probit model was used to explore the impact of HEC on the land lease in and land lease out of farm households. Four options were recognized in the Bivariate Probit model: no lease, sole lease in, sole lease out, and both lease in and lease out. The results show that: (1) The incidence of HEC signified a 25.40 % rise in sole lease out, and a 28.90 % rise in both lease in and lease out. (2) There was heterogeneity in the effect of HEC on farmers' land lease behavior. Farmers who live far away from nature reserves had a higher probability of leasing in (14.70 %) and leasing out their land (8.30 %) than farmers who live close to nature reserves. High-income farmers had a higher probability of leasing out (14.20 %) than low-income farmers; yet, they had a lower probability of leasing in (5.00 %). Small-scale land management farmers had a higher probability of leasing out land (6.70 %) than the large-scale land management group; yet, they had a lower probability of leasing in land (11.80 %). The results suggest that more focused strategies need to be adopted to help the local communities reduce the harm induced by HEC.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":17933,"journal":{"name":"Land Use Policy","volume":"153 ","pages":"Article 107532"},"PeriodicalIF":5.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Land Use Policy","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0264837725000663","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/3/24 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In recent years, the persistent interactions between Asian elephants and agricultural communities have posed significant challenges to the livelihoods of farmers as well as the utilization of their land resources. This study analyzed whether and how the Human-Elephant Conflicts (HEC) affected the land lease behavior of the farm households using a sample of 915 farm households in 9 counties of Yunnan Province, China, in 2022. The Bivariate Probit model was used to explore the impact of HEC on the land lease in and land lease out of farm households. Four options were recognized in the Bivariate Probit model: no lease, sole lease in, sole lease out, and both lease in and lease out. The results show that: (1) The incidence of HEC signified a 25.40 % rise in sole lease out, and a 28.90 % rise in both lease in and lease out. (2) There was heterogeneity in the effect of HEC on farmers' land lease behavior. Farmers who live far away from nature reserves had a higher probability of leasing in (14.70 %) and leasing out their land (8.30 %) than farmers who live close to nature reserves. High-income farmers had a higher probability of leasing out (14.20 %) than low-income farmers; yet, they had a lower probability of leasing in (5.00 %). Small-scale land management farmers had a higher probability of leasing out land (6.70 %) than the large-scale land management group; yet, they had a lower probability of leasing in land (11.80 %). The results suggest that more focused strategies need to be adopted to help the local communities reduce the harm induced by HEC.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
人象冲突对农户土地租赁行为的影响——以云南省为例
近年来,亚洲象与农业社区之间的持续互动对农民的生计和土地资源的利用构成了重大挑战。本文以2022年云南省9个县915户农户为样本,分析了人象冲突(HEC)是否以及如何影响农户的土地租赁行为。采用双变量Probit模型探讨了HEC对农户土地租赁行为和农户土地租赁行为的影响。在Bivariate Probit模型中识别出四种选择:不租赁、单独租赁、单独租赁、既租赁又租赁。结果表明:(1)单租赁区HEC发病率上升25.40 %,双租赁区HEC发病率上升28.90 %。(2) HEC对农民土地租赁行为的影响存在异质性。居住在远离自然保护区的农民,其土地租赁(14.70 %)和出租(8.30 %)的概率高于居住在自然保护区附近的农民。高收入农户出租的概率(14.20 %)高于低收入农户;然而,他们租赁的概率较低(5.00 %)。小规模土地经营农户出租土地的概率(6.70 %)高于大规模土地经营农户;但租赁土地的可能性较低(11.80 %)。结果表明,需要采取更有针对性的策略来帮助当地社区减少HEC的危害。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Land Use Policy
Land Use Policy ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES-
CiteScore
13.70
自引率
8.50%
发文量
553
期刊介绍: Land Use Policy is an international and interdisciplinary journal concerned with the social, economic, political, legal, physical and planning aspects of urban and rural land use. Land Use Policy examines issues in geography, agriculture, forestry, irrigation, environmental conservation, housing, urban development and transport in both developed and developing countries through major refereed articles and shorter viewpoint pieces.
期刊最新文献
Systemic failure in industrial land governance: A geospatial audit of allocation, occupation and utilization in Shaggar City, Ethiopia Before the ground breaks: Is inclusionary zoning a shield or a signal of gentrification? The mechanism and optimization of contract matching between new agricultural entities and agricultural land transfer model: A cost-benefit and game analysis Understanding city dynamics by analyzing investment processes - an integrated formal and semantic approach From agglomeration to downgrading: Spatial differentiation and drivers of online and offline consumption downgrading in Chinese cities
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1