Evolving disaster resilience in the Philippines: Insights from the 2021 and 2023 World Risk Poll on socio-economic, regional, and systemic factors

IF 4.5 1区 地球科学 Q1 GEOSCIENCES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY International journal of disaster risk reduction Pub Date : 2025-03-18 DOI:10.1016/j.ijdrr.2025.105415
Reina Mae B. Chong , Deborah N. Tangunan , Dexter M. Toyado , Aljon Francis Koji Elegado
{"title":"Evolving disaster resilience in the Philippines: Insights from the 2021 and 2023 World Risk Poll on socio-economic, regional, and systemic factors","authors":"Reina Mae B. Chong ,&nbsp;Deborah N. Tangunan ,&nbsp;Dexter M. Toyado ,&nbsp;Aljon Francis Koji Elegado","doi":"10.1016/j.ijdrr.2025.105415","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>The Philippines is consistently one of the world's most at-risk countries due to its location within the Pacific Ring of Fire and the “typhoon belt”. However, resilience at national and regional levels remains understudied, particularly in relation to socio-economic inequalities, gender dynamics, and governance. This study addresses this gap by analyzing resilience trends from the 2021 and 2023 World Risk Poll (WRP) Philippines dataset, focusing on the influence of gender, urbanicity, and income across individuals, households, communities, and society, using statistical and data analysis tools. Results reveal a general decline in scores, with sharp drops in Region 4B (MIMAROPA–highest resilience) and Region 7 (Central Visayas–mid-range). Conversely, Region 13 (Caraga–lowest) and Region 5 (Bicol–mid-range) improved, reflecting the success of community-based disaster risk reduction initiatives and governance. Gender disparities narrowed, with women scoring higher in household and societal resilience, while men excelled in community resilience. Urbanicity showed no significant association, although urban areas had higher individual and household resilience, while rural areas demonstrated stronger societal resilience. Income disparities persisted, with higher-income groups consistently achieving greater resilience, particularly at individual and household levels, due to better access to resources and opportunities. These findings emphasize the need for targeted, evidence-based strategies to build resilience in vulnerable regions in the Philippines, informing inclusive policies, equitable resource distribution, and governance collaboration. While the WRP provides valuable insights, reliance on self-reported perceptions highlights the need for further mixed method and longitudinal studies. Lessons from the Philippines thus offer globally relevant strategies for building resilience in disaster-prone regions.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":13915,"journal":{"name":"International journal of disaster risk reduction","volume":"121 ","pages":"Article 105415"},"PeriodicalIF":4.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International journal of disaster risk reduction","FirstCategoryId":"89","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2212420925002390","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"地球科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"GEOSCIENCES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The Philippines is consistently one of the world's most at-risk countries due to its location within the Pacific Ring of Fire and the “typhoon belt”. However, resilience at national and regional levels remains understudied, particularly in relation to socio-economic inequalities, gender dynamics, and governance. This study addresses this gap by analyzing resilience trends from the 2021 and 2023 World Risk Poll (WRP) Philippines dataset, focusing on the influence of gender, urbanicity, and income across individuals, households, communities, and society, using statistical and data analysis tools. Results reveal a general decline in scores, with sharp drops in Region 4B (MIMAROPA–highest resilience) and Region 7 (Central Visayas–mid-range). Conversely, Region 13 (Caraga–lowest) and Region 5 (Bicol–mid-range) improved, reflecting the success of community-based disaster risk reduction initiatives and governance. Gender disparities narrowed, with women scoring higher in household and societal resilience, while men excelled in community resilience. Urbanicity showed no significant association, although urban areas had higher individual and household resilience, while rural areas demonstrated stronger societal resilience. Income disparities persisted, with higher-income groups consistently achieving greater resilience, particularly at individual and household levels, due to better access to resources and opportunities. These findings emphasize the need for targeted, evidence-based strategies to build resilience in vulnerable regions in the Philippines, informing inclusive policies, equitable resource distribution, and governance collaboration. While the WRP provides valuable insights, reliance on self-reported perceptions highlights the need for further mixed method and longitudinal studies. Lessons from the Philippines thus offer globally relevant strategies for building resilience in disaster-prone regions.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
菲律宾不断发展的抗灾能力:来自2021年和2023年世界风险民意调查对社会经济、区域和系统因素的见解
由于地处环太平洋火山带和“台风带”,菲律宾一直是世界上最危险的国家之一。然而,国家和区域层面的复原力仍未得到充分研究,特别是与社会经济不平等、性别动态和治理有关的复原力。本研究通过分析2021年和2023年世界风险调查(WRP)菲律宾数据集的复原力趋势,利用统计和数据分析工具,重点关注性别、城市化和收入对个人、家庭、社区和社会的影响,解决了这一差距。结果显示,得分普遍下降,4B区(mimaropa -最高复原力)和7区(中米沙鄢-中等复原力)的得分急剧下降。相反,第13区(卡拉加指数最低)和第5区(比科尔指数中等)的情况有所改善,反映出社区减少灾害风险举措和治理的成功。性别差异缩小,女性在家庭和社会适应能力方面得分更高,而男性在社区适应能力方面得分更高。尽管城市地区的个人和家庭弹性较高,而农村地区则表现出更强的社会弹性,但城市化程度没有显著关联。收入差距持续存在,高收入群体的抗风险能力持续增强,特别是在个人和家庭层面,因为他们更容易获得资源和机会。这些研究结果强调,需要制定有针对性的、基于证据的战略,在菲律宾脆弱地区建立抵御力,为包容性政策、公平资源分配和治理合作提供信息。虽然WRP提供了有价值的见解,但对自我报告感知的依赖突出了进一步混合方法和纵向研究的必要性。因此,菲律宾的经验教训为在易受灾地区建立抗灾能力提供了全球相关的战略。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
International journal of disaster risk reduction
International journal of disaster risk reduction GEOSCIENCES, MULTIDISCIPLINARYMETEOROLOGY-METEOROLOGY & ATMOSPHERIC SCIENCES
CiteScore
8.70
自引率
18.00%
发文量
688
审稿时长
79 days
期刊介绍: The International Journal of Disaster Risk Reduction (IJDRR) is the journal for researchers, policymakers and practitioners across diverse disciplines: earth sciences and their implications; environmental sciences; engineering; urban studies; geography; and the social sciences. IJDRR publishes fundamental and applied research, critical reviews, policy papers and case studies with a particular focus on multi-disciplinary research that aims to reduce the impact of natural, technological, social and intentional disasters. IJDRR stimulates exchange of ideas and knowledge transfer on disaster research, mitigation, adaptation, prevention and risk reduction at all geographical scales: local, national and international. Key topics:- -multifaceted disaster and cascading disasters -the development of disaster risk reduction strategies and techniques -discussion and development of effective warning and educational systems for risk management at all levels -disasters associated with climate change -vulnerability analysis and vulnerability trends -emerging risks -resilience against disasters. The journal particularly encourages papers that approach risk from a multi-disciplinary perspective.
期刊最新文献
Farmers’ social networks and adoption of disaster risk reduction measures: An experimental study in Uganda Quantifying the social costs of power outages and restoration disparities across four U.S. hurricanes Network metrics for bridge prioritization considering bridge condition, accessibility, equity and uncertainty Layered or simple: Making impact chains more accessible and useful to stakeholders The relationship between social vulnerability and wildfire structure loss across California
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1