Tsunami evacuation risk change associated with urban recovery in Banda Aceh after 2004 Aceh tsunami

IF 4.5 1区 地球科学 Q1 GEOSCIENCES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY International journal of disaster risk reduction Pub Date : 2025-03-15 DOI:10.1016/j.ijdrr.2025.105400
Osamu Murao , Mizuki Sato , Kazuya Sugiyasu , Hiroyuki Miura , Mufidatun Khoiriyah , Ryo Saito , Muzailin Affan
{"title":"Tsunami evacuation risk change associated with urban recovery in Banda Aceh after 2004 Aceh tsunami","authors":"Osamu Murao ,&nbsp;Mizuki Sato ,&nbsp;Kazuya Sugiyasu ,&nbsp;Hiroyuki Miura ,&nbsp;Mufidatun Khoiriyah ,&nbsp;Ryo Saito ,&nbsp;Muzailin Affan","doi":"10.1016/j.ijdrr.2025.105400","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Twenty years after the 2004 Aceh tsunami, Banda Aceh has undergone significant urban recovery, including the development of tsunami evacuation infrastructure. However, shifts in population distribution and evacuation capacity necessitate a reassessment of tsunami evacuation risk. This study evaluates the extent to which the “Build Back Better” strategy has been realized in terms of tsunami evacuation risk reduction, considering long-term population changes and the expansion of evacuation facilities. Using WorldPop Hub data (2000–2020), we analyzed demographic changes within tsunami risk zones in Banda Aceh. While the highest-risk zone (R3) experienced a population reduction to three-quarters of its previous level, the risk-free zone (R0) saw a 6.9 percentage point increase, suggesting relocation from high-risk coastal areas. However, nearly 29 % of Banda Aceh’s population still resides in high-risk zones, highlighting persistent vulnerabilities. To assess evacuation feasibility, we conducted network-based tsunami evacuation simulations in Meuraxa, the most at-risk district, under three scenarios: (A) horizontal evacuation only, (B) using existing tsunami evacuation buildings (TEBs), and (C) using both TEBs and nearby facilities. The evacuation failure rates within the 35-min tsunami arrival time were 84.5 %, 3.1 %, and 1.1 %, respectively, indicating the remaining risks despite recovery efforts. While TEBs reduced evacuation times by over 30 min, facility capacity remained imbalanced, with some exceeding capacity tenfold. These findings highlight the need for improved evacuation facility placement and capacity to enhance future tsunami resilience.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":13915,"journal":{"name":"International journal of disaster risk reduction","volume":"121 ","pages":"Article 105400"},"PeriodicalIF":4.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International journal of disaster risk reduction","FirstCategoryId":"89","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2212420925002249","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"地球科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"GEOSCIENCES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Twenty years after the 2004 Aceh tsunami, Banda Aceh has undergone significant urban recovery, including the development of tsunami evacuation infrastructure. However, shifts in population distribution and evacuation capacity necessitate a reassessment of tsunami evacuation risk. This study evaluates the extent to which the “Build Back Better” strategy has been realized in terms of tsunami evacuation risk reduction, considering long-term population changes and the expansion of evacuation facilities. Using WorldPop Hub data (2000–2020), we analyzed demographic changes within tsunami risk zones in Banda Aceh. While the highest-risk zone (R3) experienced a population reduction to three-quarters of its previous level, the risk-free zone (R0) saw a 6.9 percentage point increase, suggesting relocation from high-risk coastal areas. However, nearly 29 % of Banda Aceh’s population still resides in high-risk zones, highlighting persistent vulnerabilities. To assess evacuation feasibility, we conducted network-based tsunami evacuation simulations in Meuraxa, the most at-risk district, under three scenarios: (A) horizontal evacuation only, (B) using existing tsunami evacuation buildings (TEBs), and (C) using both TEBs and nearby facilities. The evacuation failure rates within the 35-min tsunami arrival time were 84.5 %, 3.1 %, and 1.1 %, respectively, indicating the remaining risks despite recovery efforts. While TEBs reduced evacuation times by over 30 min, facility capacity remained imbalanced, with some exceeding capacity tenfold. These findings highlight the need for improved evacuation facility placement and capacity to enhance future tsunami resilience.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
2004年亚齐海啸后,班达亚齐市与城市恢复相关的海啸疏散风险变化
2004年亚齐海啸发生20年后,班达亚齐经历了重大的城市恢复,包括海啸疏散基础设施的发展。然而,人口分布和疏散能力的变化需要重新评估海啸疏散风险。本研究从降低海啸疏散风险的角度,考虑到长期的人口变化和疏散设施的扩大,评估“重建得更好”战略的实现程度。利用WorldPop Hub 2000-2020年的数据,我们分析了班达亚齐海啸危险区的人口变化。虽然最高风险地区(R3)的人口减少到之前水平的四分之三,但无风险地区(R0)的人口增加了6.9个百分点,这表明从高风险的沿海地区搬迁。然而,班达亚齐近29%的人口仍然居住在高风险地区,凸显了持续存在的脆弱性。为了评估疏散的可行性,我们在最危险的地区Meuraxa进行了基于网络的海啸疏散模拟,在三种情况下:(A)仅水平疏散,(B)使用现有的海啸疏散建筑(teb), (C)同时使用teb和附近设施。在35分钟的海啸到达时间内,疏散失败率分别为84.5%、3.1%和1.1%,这表明尽管进行了恢复工作,但仍存在风险。虽然teb将疏散时间缩短了30多分钟,但设施容量仍然不平衡,有些设施的容量超过了10倍。这些发现强调需要改善疏散设施的安置和能力,以增强未来的海啸抵御能力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
International journal of disaster risk reduction
International journal of disaster risk reduction GEOSCIENCES, MULTIDISCIPLINARYMETEOROLOGY-METEOROLOGY & ATMOSPHERIC SCIENCES
CiteScore
8.70
自引率
18.00%
发文量
688
审稿时长
79 days
期刊介绍: The International Journal of Disaster Risk Reduction (IJDRR) is the journal for researchers, policymakers and practitioners across diverse disciplines: earth sciences and their implications; environmental sciences; engineering; urban studies; geography; and the social sciences. IJDRR publishes fundamental and applied research, critical reviews, policy papers and case studies with a particular focus on multi-disciplinary research that aims to reduce the impact of natural, technological, social and intentional disasters. IJDRR stimulates exchange of ideas and knowledge transfer on disaster research, mitigation, adaptation, prevention and risk reduction at all geographical scales: local, national and international. Key topics:- -multifaceted disaster and cascading disasters -the development of disaster risk reduction strategies and techniques -discussion and development of effective warning and educational systems for risk management at all levels -disasters associated with climate change -vulnerability analysis and vulnerability trends -emerging risks -resilience against disasters. The journal particularly encourages papers that approach risk from a multi-disciplinary perspective.
期刊最新文献
Framework for predicting multi-sector business interruption losses solely from earthquake scenarios Devising wireless flood-sensing networks for critical infrastructure facilities The role of social infrastructure in community-based disaster resilience: A case study of the 2024 Noto Peninsula earthquake Recent developments in tsunami preparedness in the North-Eastern Atlantic and Mediterranean region: Challenges, strengths, and weaknesses Recurrent risk and the disaster loop: A forensic approach to urban flooding
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1