Does government deleveraging affect corporate cost stickiness?

IF 8.7 2区 经济学 Q1 ECONOMICS Economic Analysis and Policy Pub Date : 2025-03-18 DOI:10.1016/j.eap.2025.03.029
Li Wang , Yajun Tang , Haicheng Shu , Ziqing Zhang
{"title":"Does government deleveraging affect corporate cost stickiness?","authors":"Li Wang ,&nbsp;Yajun Tang ,&nbsp;Haicheng Shu ,&nbsp;Ziqing Zhang","doi":"10.1016/j.eap.2025.03.029","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Asymmetric cost behavior is a significant topic within the field of manage- ment accounting. Adjustments in macroeconomic policies inevitably exert profound influences on corporate management decisions, potentially leading to changes in cost behavior. This paper, grounded in the macroeconomic backdrop of China's deleveraging policy, delves into the potential impact of this policy on cost stickiness at the micro-enterprise level. The study reveals that the enforced implementation of the deleveraging policy has, to some extent, inhibited cost stickiness in enterprises. Variations in the methods and degrees of deleveraging adopted by enterprises result in differing levels of inhibition on cost stickiness. Compared to equity-increasing deleverag- ing, debt-reducing deleveraging demonstrates a more pronounced effect in mitigating cost stickiness. Furthermore, in the heterogeneity analysis, the inhibitory effect of the deleveraging policy on cost stickiness is particularly evident in enterprises with higher external financing dependence, those with- out well-established bank-enterprise relationships, and those subject to in- dustrial policy constraints. This research provides empirical validation and support for the anticipated motivational factors behind cost stickiness within the Chinese context, thereby expanding and deepening the understanding of how macroeconomic policies influence micro-enterprise behavior.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":54200,"journal":{"name":"Economic Analysis and Policy","volume":"86 ","pages":"Pages 288-303"},"PeriodicalIF":8.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Economic Analysis and Policy","FirstCategoryId":"96","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0313592625001031","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ECONOMICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Asymmetric cost behavior is a significant topic within the field of manage- ment accounting. Adjustments in macroeconomic policies inevitably exert profound influences on corporate management decisions, potentially leading to changes in cost behavior. This paper, grounded in the macroeconomic backdrop of China's deleveraging policy, delves into the potential impact of this policy on cost stickiness at the micro-enterprise level. The study reveals that the enforced implementation of the deleveraging policy has, to some extent, inhibited cost stickiness in enterprises. Variations in the methods and degrees of deleveraging adopted by enterprises result in differing levels of inhibition on cost stickiness. Compared to equity-increasing deleverag- ing, debt-reducing deleveraging demonstrates a more pronounced effect in mitigating cost stickiness. Furthermore, in the heterogeneity analysis, the inhibitory effect of the deleveraging policy on cost stickiness is particularly evident in enterprises with higher external financing dependence, those with- out well-established bank-enterprise relationships, and those subject to in- dustrial policy constraints. This research provides empirical validation and support for the anticipated motivational factors behind cost stickiness within the Chinese context, thereby expanding and deepening the understanding of how macroeconomic policies influence micro-enterprise behavior.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
政府去杠杆化是否影响企业成本粘性?
不对称成本行为是管理会计领域的一个重要课题。宏观经济政策的调整不可避免地对企业管理决策产生深远影响,可能导致成本行为的变化。本文立足于中国去杠杆政策的宏观经济背景,从微观企业层面探讨了去杠杆政策对成本粘性的潜在影响。研究表明,去杠杆政策的强制实施在一定程度上抑制了企业的成本粘性。企业去杠杆的方式和程度不同,对成本粘性的抑制程度也不同。与增加股权的去杠杆相比,减少债务的去杠杆在降低成本粘性方面表现出更明显的效果。此外,在异质性分析中,去杠杆政策对成本粘性的抑制作用在外部融资依赖度较高的企业、银企关系不完善的企业和受行业内政策约束的企业中尤为明显。本研究为中国背景下成本粘性背后的预期激励因素提供了实证验证和支持,从而拓展和深化了对宏观经济政策如何影响微观企业行为的理解。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
9.80
自引率
9.20%
发文量
231
审稿时长
93 days
期刊介绍: Economic Analysis and Policy (established 1970) publishes articles from all branches of economics with a particular focus on research, theoretical and applied, which has strong policy relevance. The journal also publishes survey articles and empirical replications on key policy issues. Authors are expected to highlight the main insights in a non-technical introduction and in the conclusion.
期刊最新文献
The impact of government green bonds on green innovation: Evidence from supply chain spillovers Central–local fiscal policy orientation consistency and high-quality economic development in energy cities: Evidence from China Does the loan-to-value policy constrain housing prices? Evidence from China How do regional trade agreements change the risk exposure of the industrial chain? Inter-city difference in extreme heat exposure and inter-regional capital flows: Evidence from the cross-region investment of listed companies
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1