Squishy and Crunchy Invasive Invertebrates: Environmental DNA Is Not Shed Equally

IF 6.2 Q1 Agricultural and Biological Sciences Environmental DNA Pub Date : 2025-03-20 DOI:10.1002/edn3.70072
Emily Rose Lancaster, Erin Katherine Grey, Damian Coman Brady, Markus Frederich
{"title":"Squishy and Crunchy Invasive Invertebrates: Environmental DNA Is Not Shed Equally","authors":"Emily Rose Lancaster,&nbsp;Erin Katherine Grey,&nbsp;Damian Coman Brady,&nbsp;Markus Frederich","doi":"10.1002/edn3.70072","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Environmental DNA (eDNA) detection can be a powerful approach to detect organisms in low abundance and can be crucial for early invasive species detection. Despite its potential, the body plan diversity of invertebrates can pose significant challenges, notably arthropods with exoskeletons that may have low eDNA shedding rates. In this study, we validated nine single-species quantitative PCR assays targeting invasive and nuisance species representing various body plans in the Gulf of Maine, an area of rapid ocean warming. Combining visual surveys and molecular analyses in a two-year eDNA time series, we successfully detected eight of nine target species with qPCR. Of the soft-bodied, “squishy” species, four of five exhibited eDNA detection consistent with visual abundances. Of species with an exoskeleton or shell (crunchy), three of four species were not detected consistently in accordance with visual abundance. Our findings demonstrate the effectiveness of eDNA for early invasive species detection but emphasize the need for long-term field and laboratory validation, informed by species' bauplan. It is imperative to recognize that while eDNA is a valuable tool, its applicability varies across taxa. Therefore, interpreting eDNA results requires careful consideration of its limitations and the specific characteristics of the target organisms.</p>","PeriodicalId":52828,"journal":{"name":"Environmental DNA","volume":"7 2","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":6.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/edn3.70072","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Environmental DNA","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/edn3.70072","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Agricultural and Biological Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Environmental DNA (eDNA) detection can be a powerful approach to detect organisms in low abundance and can be crucial for early invasive species detection. Despite its potential, the body plan diversity of invertebrates can pose significant challenges, notably arthropods with exoskeletons that may have low eDNA shedding rates. In this study, we validated nine single-species quantitative PCR assays targeting invasive and nuisance species representing various body plans in the Gulf of Maine, an area of rapid ocean warming. Combining visual surveys and molecular analyses in a two-year eDNA time series, we successfully detected eight of nine target species with qPCR. Of the soft-bodied, “squishy” species, four of five exhibited eDNA detection consistent with visual abundances. Of species with an exoskeleton or shell (crunchy), three of four species were not detected consistently in accordance with visual abundance. Our findings demonstrate the effectiveness of eDNA for early invasive species detection but emphasize the need for long-term field and laboratory validation, informed by species' bauplan. It is imperative to recognize that while eDNA is a valuable tool, its applicability varies across taxa. Therefore, interpreting eDNA results requires careful consideration of its limitations and the specific characteristics of the target organisms.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
松软和松脆的入侵无脊椎动物:环境 DNA 并非一成不变
环境DNA (eDNA)检测是一种检测低丰度生物的有效方法,对早期入侵物种检测至关重要。尽管具有潜力,但无脊椎动物的身体结构多样性可能会带来重大挑战,特别是具有外骨骼的节肢动物,其eDNA脱落率可能较低。在这项研究中,我们验证了9种单物种定量PCR检测,目标是代表缅因湾(一个海洋快速变暖的地区)各种身体计划的入侵和滋扰物种。结合视觉调查和两年eDNA时间序列的分子分析,我们成功地用qPCR检测了9个目标物种中的8个。在软体的、“黏糊糊的”物种中,五分之四的eDNA检测结果与视觉丰度一致。在有外骨骼或壳(脆)的物种中,四分之三的物种没有按照视觉丰度被检测到。我们的研究结果证明了eDNA在早期入侵物种检测中的有效性,但强调需要长期的现场和实验室验证,并根据物种的bauplan进行验证。必须认识到,虽然eDNA是一个有价值的工具,但其适用性因分类群而异。因此,解释eDNA结果需要仔细考虑其局限性和目标生物的特定特征。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Environmental DNA
Environmental DNA Agricultural and Biological Sciences-Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics
CiteScore
11.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
99
审稿时长
16 weeks
期刊最新文献
Investigating Environmental DNA Variability and Species Detections Through Passive and Active Sampling Across Time: A Case Study From a Hyper-Diverse Coastal System BirT: A Novel Primer Pair for Avian Environmental DNA Metabarcoding Environmental Gradients and Ecological Processes Are Main Drivers of Eukaryotic Diversity in the Eastern Red Sea A Comparison of DNA Metabarcoding Cloacal Swabs and Stomach Contents for Shark Diet Reconstruction ANEMONE Global's First eDNA-Based Assessment: Insights Toward a Standardized Global Monitoring Network
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1