Using dynamic foodscape models to assess bottom-up constraints on population performance of herbivores

IF 4.3 2区 环境科学与生态学 Q1 ECOLOGY Ecological Applications Pub Date : 2025-03-24 DOI:10.1002/eap.70015
Sierra L. Robatcek, Lisa A. Shipley, Craig White, Ryan A. Long
{"title":"Using dynamic foodscape models to assess bottom-up constraints on population performance of herbivores","authors":"Sierra L. Robatcek,&nbsp;Lisa A. Shipley,&nbsp;Craig White,&nbsp;Ryan A. Long","doi":"10.1002/eap.70015","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Resource heterogeneity governs a multitude of ecological processes, but the mechanisms by which heterogeneity influences population performance are not fully resolved. Because optimizing behavior is challenging in heterogeneous landscapes, individual variation in foraging and movement strategies is common, and understanding the consequences of that variation is one of the most pressing challenges in modern ecology. In theory, such consequences should be modulated at least in part by nutrition, which directly influences discretionary energy available for growth and reproduction. We developed a series of linked dynamic models for predicting (1) spatiotemporal variation in the foodscapes available to seven distinct populations of elk (<i>Cervus canadensis</i>) in Idaho, USA, and (2) variation in pregnancy rates among those populations as a function of foodscape use and availability. Foodscape models, which predicted variation in suitable forage biomass (biomass of forage that met or exceeded requirements of female elk at peak lactation), generally performed well, with adjusted <i>R</i><sup>2</sup> values ranging from 0.34 to 0.51. Patterns of foodscape use differed among populations and years, with some populations showing selection for the foodscape and others exhibiting indifference or even avoidance of high-quality forage resources. Pregnancy rates ranged from 66% to 100%, and our top model relating pregnancy to metrics of forage availability explained 41% of the variation among 20 elk population-years. Our top model relating pregnancy to foodscape use by elk explained 57% of the variation in pregnancy rates among 12 population-years. Pregnancy rates were influenced more strongly by heterogeneity in foodscape use and availability than by differences in mean or maximum suitable biomass among populations. Our results suggest that population performance of elk was modulated both by the availability of high-quality forage and by factors that constrained use of the foodscape by elk. The dynamic modeling approach we developed for linking nutritional resources to herbivore performance is generalizable to many other species and systems and can be used by wildlife managers to assess whether herbivore populations might be limited by bottom-up factors.</p>","PeriodicalId":55168,"journal":{"name":"Ecological Applications","volume":"35 2","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ecological Applications","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://esajournals.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/eap.70015","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Resource heterogeneity governs a multitude of ecological processes, but the mechanisms by which heterogeneity influences population performance are not fully resolved. Because optimizing behavior is challenging in heterogeneous landscapes, individual variation in foraging and movement strategies is common, and understanding the consequences of that variation is one of the most pressing challenges in modern ecology. In theory, such consequences should be modulated at least in part by nutrition, which directly influences discretionary energy available for growth and reproduction. We developed a series of linked dynamic models for predicting (1) spatiotemporal variation in the foodscapes available to seven distinct populations of elk (Cervus canadensis) in Idaho, USA, and (2) variation in pregnancy rates among those populations as a function of foodscape use and availability. Foodscape models, which predicted variation in suitable forage biomass (biomass of forage that met or exceeded requirements of female elk at peak lactation), generally performed well, with adjusted R2 values ranging from 0.34 to 0.51. Patterns of foodscape use differed among populations and years, with some populations showing selection for the foodscape and others exhibiting indifference or even avoidance of high-quality forage resources. Pregnancy rates ranged from 66% to 100%, and our top model relating pregnancy to metrics of forage availability explained 41% of the variation among 20 elk population-years. Our top model relating pregnancy to foodscape use by elk explained 57% of the variation in pregnancy rates among 12 population-years. Pregnancy rates were influenced more strongly by heterogeneity in foodscape use and availability than by differences in mean or maximum suitable biomass among populations. Our results suggest that population performance of elk was modulated both by the availability of high-quality forage and by factors that constrained use of the foodscape by elk. The dynamic modeling approach we developed for linking nutritional resources to herbivore performance is generalizable to many other species and systems and can be used by wildlife managers to assess whether herbivore populations might be limited by bottom-up factors.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
利用动态食物景观模型评估草食动物种群性能的自下而上约束
资源异质性制约着多种生态过程,但异质性影响种群表现的机制尚未完全阐明。由于在异质性景观中优化行为具有挑战性,因此个体在觅食和运动策略上的变异很常见,而了解这种变异的后果是现代生态学最紧迫的挑战之一。从理论上讲,这种后果至少有一部分应受到营养的调节,因为营养直接影响着可用于生长和繁殖的可支配能量。我们开发了一系列相关联的动态模型,用于预测(1)美国爱达荷州七个不同麋鹿种群食物景观的时空变化,以及(2)这些种群怀孕率的变化与食物景观的使用和可用性的函数关系。食物景观模型可预测适宜饲料生物量(满足或超过雌性麋鹿泌乳高峰期需求的饲料生物量)的变化,一般表现良好,调整后的 R2 值在 0.34 到 0.51 之间。不同种群和不同年份的麋鹿对食物景观的利用模式各不相同,有些种群表现出对食物景观的选择,有些种群则表现出对优质饲料资源的漠视甚至回避。怀孕率从 66% 到 100% 不等,我们将怀孕率与草料可用性指标相关联的最高模型解释了 20 个麋鹿种群年中 41% 的变化。我们建立的怀孕与麋鹿对食物景观的使用相关的最高模型解释了 12 个种群年中怀孕率变化的 57%。与种群间平均或最大适宜生物量的差异相比,食物景观使用和可用性的异质性对怀孕率的影响更大。我们的研究结果表明,麋鹿种群的表现既受到优质饲料供应的影响,也受到制约麋鹿利用食物景观的因素的影响。我们开发的将营养资源与食草动物表现联系起来的动态建模方法可以推广到许多其他物种和系统,野生动物管理者可以利用这种方法来评估食草动物种群是否会受到自下而上因素的限制。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Ecological Applications
Ecological Applications 环境科学-环境科学
CiteScore
9.50
自引率
2.00%
发文量
268
审稿时长
6 months
期刊介绍: The pages of Ecological Applications are open to research and discussion papers that integrate ecological science and concepts with their application and implications. Of special interest are papers that develop the basic scientific principles on which environmental decision-making should rest, and those that discuss the application of ecological concepts to environmental problem solving, policy, and management. Papers that deal explicitly with policy matters are welcome. Interdisciplinary approaches are encouraged, as are short communications on emerging environmental challenges.
期刊最新文献
At the intersection of soundscapes and roads: Quantifying anthrophony's influence on wildlife crossing structure use Atmospheric dryness dominates diurnal carbon–water coupling in mid-latitude forests Management inputs, site conditions, and fire history shape outcomes of invasive plant control and native recovery Artificial surface water broadens the spatiotemporal footprint of herbivores and alters species responses Unraveling abundance from occurrence: Modeling an endangered rodent population with low capture probability
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1