Blessing or curse? When and why stretch goal promotes and inhibits employee job progression

IF 3.5 2区 管理学 Q1 MANAGEMENT Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology Pub Date : 2025-03-24 DOI:10.1111/joop.70019
Yujie Shi, Jih-Yu Mao, Jiang Xu
{"title":"Blessing or curse? When and why stretch goal promotes and inhibits employee job progression","authors":"Yujie Shi,&nbsp;Jih-Yu Mao,&nbsp;Jiang Xu","doi":"10.1111/joop.70019","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Although leaders in organizations may set stretch goals (i.e., extremely difficult goals that seem unattainable given employees' current capabilities) to motivate employee development, the extreme difficulty of such goals may also demotivate them. Understanding when stretch goals may foster rather than hinder employee development is critical. By exploring the contingent role of leader goal support, this research delves into the motivational and demotivational effects of stretch goals. The results of an experimental study and a multi-wave field study suggest that employees are more likely to appraise stretch goals as challenges when leader goal support is higher, and more likely to appraise stretch goals as hindrances when leader goal support is lower. Challenge and hindrance appraisals, subsequently, lead to proactive skill development and withdrawal behaviour, respectively. That stretch goals were more directly related to hindrance than challenge appraisals in both studies should caution leaders in organizations against using stretch goals often. When stretch goals are used, they should be complemented with high leader goal support.</p>","PeriodicalId":48330,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology","volume":"98 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://bpspsychub.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/joop.70019","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MANAGEMENT","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Although leaders in organizations may set stretch goals (i.e., extremely difficult goals that seem unattainable given employees' current capabilities) to motivate employee development, the extreme difficulty of such goals may also demotivate them. Understanding when stretch goals may foster rather than hinder employee development is critical. By exploring the contingent role of leader goal support, this research delves into the motivational and demotivational effects of stretch goals. The results of an experimental study and a multi-wave field study suggest that employees are more likely to appraise stretch goals as challenges when leader goal support is higher, and more likely to appraise stretch goals as hindrances when leader goal support is lower. Challenge and hindrance appraisals, subsequently, lead to proactive skill development and withdrawal behaviour, respectively. That stretch goals were more directly related to hindrance than challenge appraisals in both studies should caution leaders in organizations against using stretch goals often. When stretch goals are used, they should be complemented with high leader goal support.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
祝福还是诅咒?何时以及为什么弹性目标会促进或阻碍员工的工作进展
虽然组织中的领导者可能会设定拉伸目标(即,极其困难的目标,似乎无法实现的员工目前的能力)来激励员工的发展,这种目标的极端困难也可能使他们失去动力。了解什么时候弹性目标可以促进而不是阻碍员工的发展是至关重要的。本研究通过探索领导者目标支持的偶然性作用,探讨弹性目标的激励效应和失动力效应。实验研究和多波场研究结果表明,当领导者目标支持度较高时,员工更倾向于将拉伸目标评价为挑战;当领导者目标支持度较低时,员工更倾向于将拉伸目标评价为阻碍。挑战评估和障碍评估随后分别导致主动技能发展和退缩行为。在这两项研究中,弹性目标与障碍评估的关系比挑战评估更直接,这应该提醒组织中的领导者不要经常使用弹性目标。当使用弹性目标时,它们应该得到高层领导目标支持的补充。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
8.90
自引率
4.80%
发文量
38
期刊介绍: The Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology aims to increase understanding of people and organisations at work including: - industrial, organizational, work, vocational and personnel psychology - behavioural and cognitive aspects of industrial relations - ergonomics and human factors Innovative or interdisciplinary approaches with a psychological emphasis are particularly welcome. So are papers which develop the links between occupational/organisational psychology and other areas of the discipline, such as social and cognitive psychology.
期刊最新文献
Transformational and directive leadership in the operating room: Complementary effects under surgical complexity Balancing newcomer social integration and voice during organizational socialization: A longitudinal study of antecedents, consequences and boundary conditions Directive leadership as social adaptation: How leader and aggregate team core self-evaluation interact with team past performance to shape directive behaviour Exploring the role of cognitive job demands in job demands-resources theory Exploring the relation between IRT estimates of within-person variability in personality and job performance
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1