Validation of an estrogen receptor dimerization(α-α/α-β/β-β) BRET-based biosensors for screening estrogenic endocrine-disrupting chemicals

IF 3.5 3区 医学 Q2 FOOD SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY Food and Chemical Toxicology Pub Date : 2025-03-22 DOI:10.1016/j.fct.2025.115391
Yong-Kook Kwon , Na-yeon Kim , Soomin Yum , Haksoo Lee , BuHyun Youn , Gunyoung Lee , Yeong Min Shin , Hye Young Lee
{"title":"Validation of an estrogen receptor dimerization(α-α/α-β/β-β) BRET-based biosensors for screening estrogenic endocrine-disrupting chemicals","authors":"Yong-Kook Kwon ,&nbsp;Na-yeon Kim ,&nbsp;Soomin Yum ,&nbsp;Haksoo Lee ,&nbsp;BuHyun Youn ,&nbsp;Gunyoung Lee ,&nbsp;Yeong Min Shin ,&nbsp;Hye Young Lee","doi":"10.1016/j.fct.2025.115391","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>We validated the reproducibility and accuracy of a previously developed assay for screening endocrine-disrupting chemicals (EDCs) based on estrogen receptor (ER) dimerization (α-α/α-β/β-β), following OECD GD34 guidelines, to assess its applicability across various laboratories. The inter- and intra-laboratory accuracy was evaluated using 22 validation substances (ICCVAM-recommended substances for validating <em>in vitro</em> ER-binding assays) with confirmed estrogenic activity in four independent laboratories. Intra-laboratory reproducibility for 22 chemicals was at least 95.5 % for ER α-α and β-β and 100 % for ER α-β, with mean values of 98.9 % (ER α-α), 100 % (ER α-β), and 98.9 % (ER β-β), respectively. The inter-laboratory qualitative reproducibility for ER α-α, ER α-β, and ER β-β was 100 %, 100 %, and 95.5 %, respectively. The validated results for the ER dimerization (α-α/α-β/β-β) assays were compared with the results (17 test chemicals) from the National Toxicology Program Interagency Center for Evaluation of Alternative Toxicological Methods (NICEATM), confirming the validity of the assay. The accuracies for ER α-α, α-β, β-β dimerization in cell were 88.2 %, 94.1 %, 88.2 %, respectively. Thus, ER dimerization assays demonstrated high intra- and inter-laboratory reproducibility and accuracy through this validation study. This suggests that the assay is a robust method for detecting ER dimerization within cells.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":317,"journal":{"name":"Food and Chemical Toxicology","volume":"200 ","pages":"Article 115391"},"PeriodicalIF":3.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Food and Chemical Toxicology","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0278691525001589","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"FOOD SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

We validated the reproducibility and accuracy of a previously developed assay for screening endocrine-disrupting chemicals (EDCs) based on estrogen receptor (ER) dimerization (α-α/α-β/β-β), following OECD GD34 guidelines, to assess its applicability across various laboratories. The inter- and intra-laboratory accuracy was evaluated using 22 validation substances (ICCVAM-recommended substances for validating in vitro ER-binding assays) with confirmed estrogenic activity in four independent laboratories. Intra-laboratory reproducibility for 22 chemicals was at least 95.5 % for ER α-α and β-β and 100 % for ER α-β, with mean values of 98.9 % (ER α-α), 100 % (ER α-β), and 98.9 % (ER β-β), respectively. The inter-laboratory qualitative reproducibility for ER α-α, ER α-β, and ER β-β was 100 %, 100 %, and 95.5 %, respectively. The validated results for the ER dimerization (α-α/α-β/β-β) assays were compared with the results (17 test chemicals) from the National Toxicology Program Interagency Center for Evaluation of Alternative Toxicological Methods (NICEATM), confirming the validity of the assay. The accuracies for ER α-α, α-β, β-β dimerization in cell were 88.2 %, 94.1 %, 88.2 %, respectively. Thus, ER dimerization assays demonstrated high intra- and inter-laboratory reproducibility and accuracy through this validation study. This suggests that the assay is a robust method for detecting ER dimerization within cells.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
雌激素受体二聚化(α-α/α-β/β-β) bret生物传感器筛选雌激素内分泌干扰物的验证。
我们验证了先前开发的基于雌激素受体(ER)二聚化(α-α/α-β/β-β)筛选内分泌干扰物质(EDCs)的检测方法的可重复性和准确性,遵循OECD GD34指南,以评估其在各个实验室的适用性。在四个独立的实验室中,使用22种确认的雌激素活性的验证物质(iccvam推荐的用于验证体外er结合测定的物质)来评估实验室间和实验室内的准确性。22种化学物质的ER α-α和β-β的实验室重复性至少为95.5%,ER α-β的实验室重复性至少为100%,平均值分别为98.9% (ER α-α)、100% (ER α-β)和98.9% (ER β-β)。ER α-α、ER α-β和ER β-β的实验室间定性重现性分别为100%、100%和95.5%。将内质网二聚化(α-α/α-β/β-β)测定法的验证结果与美国国家毒理学计划替代毒理学方法评估机构间中心(NICEATM)的结果(17种测试化学品)进行了比较,证实了该测定法的有效性。细胞中ER α-α、α-β、β-β二聚化的准确度分别为88.2%、94.1%、88.2%。因此,通过本验证研究,内质网二聚化分析显示了高的实验室内和实验室间的重复性和准确性。这表明该试验是一种检测细胞内内质网二聚化的可靠方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Food and Chemical Toxicology
Food and Chemical Toxicology 工程技术-毒理学
CiteScore
10.90
自引率
4.70%
发文量
651
审稿时长
31 days
期刊介绍: Food and Chemical Toxicology (FCT), an internationally renowned journal, that publishes original research articles and reviews on toxic effects, in animals and humans, of natural or synthetic chemicals occurring in the human environment with particular emphasis on food, drugs, and chemicals, including agricultural and industrial safety, and consumer product safety. Areas such as safety evaluation of novel foods and ingredients, biotechnologically-derived products, and nanomaterials are included in the scope of the journal. FCT also encourages submission of papers on inter-relationships between nutrition and toxicology and on in vitro techniques, particularly those fostering the 3 Rs. The principal aim of the journal is to publish high impact, scholarly work and to serve as a multidisciplinary forum for research in toxicology. Papers submitted will be judged on the basis of scientific originality and contribution to the field, quality and subject matter. Studies should address at least one of the following: -Adverse physiological/biochemical, or pathological changes induced by specific defined substances -New techniques for assessing potential toxicity, including molecular biology -Mechanisms underlying toxic phenomena -Toxicological examinations of specific chemicals or consumer products, both those showing adverse effects and those demonstrating safety, that meet current standards of scientific acceptability. Authors must clearly and briefly identify what novel toxic effect (s) or toxic mechanism (s) of the chemical are being reported and what their significance is in the abstract. Furthermore, sufficient doses should be included in order to provide information on NOAEL/LOAEL values.
期刊最新文献
Response to the Letter to the Editor: "Translational perspectives on dietary prebiotics and iron for reducing rice cadmium bioavailability". Translational perspectives on dietary prebiotics and iron for reducing rice cadmium bioavailability. Deriving toxicological reference values for dietary inorganic arsenic exposure from epidemiological evidence of cardiovascular disease risk. Read-across prediction of nongenotoxic thyroid carcinogenicity of pesticides in rats using mechanism-based in vitro assay data. Analytical measurement and human health risk assessment of selected metals from commercial chocolate bars.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1