Machine learning-based model for predicting all-cause mortality in severe pneumonia.

IF 3.4 3区 医学 Q1 RESPIRATORY SYSTEM BMJ Open Respiratory Research Pub Date : 2025-03-22 DOI:10.1136/bmjresp-2023-001983
Weichao Zhao, Xuyan Li, Lianjun Gao, Zhuang Ai, Yaping Lu, Jiachen Li, Dong Wang, Xinlou Li, Nan Song, Xuan Huang, Zhao-Hui Tong
{"title":"Machine learning-based model for predicting all-cause mortality in severe pneumonia.","authors":"Weichao Zhao, Xuyan Li, Lianjun Gao, Zhuang Ai, Yaping Lu, Jiachen Li, Dong Wang, Xinlou Li, Nan Song, Xuan Huang, Zhao-Hui Tong","doi":"10.1136/bmjresp-2023-001983","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Severe pneumonia has a poor prognosis and high mortality. Current severity scores such as Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation (APACHE-II) and Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (SOFA), have limited ability to help clinicians in classification and management decisions. The goal of this study was to analyse the clinical characteristics of severe pneumonia and develop a machine learning-based mortality-prediction model for patients with severe pneumonia.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Consecutive patients with severe pneumonia between 2013 and 2022 admitted to Beijing Chaoyang Hospital affiliated with Capital Medical University were included. In-hospital all-cause mortality was the outcome of this study. We performed a retrospective analysis of the cohort, stratifying patients into survival and non-survival groups, using mainstream machine learning algorithms (light gradient boosting machine, support vector classifier and random forest). We aimed to construct a mortality-prediction model for patients with severe pneumonia based on their accessible clinical and laboratory data. The discriminative ability was evaluated using the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC). The calibration curve was used to assess the fit goodness of the model, and decision curve analysis was performed to quantify clinical utility. By means of logistic regression, independent risk factors for death in severe pneumonia were figured out to provide an important basis for clinical decision-making.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 875 patients were included in the development and validation cohorts, with the in-hospital mortality rate of 14.6%. The AUC of the model in the internal validation set was 0.8779 (95% CI, 0.738 to 0.974), showing a competitive discrimination ability that outperformed those of traditional clinical scoring systems, that is, APACHE-II, SOFA, CURB-65 (confusion, urea, respiratory rate, blood pressure, age ≥65 years), Pneumonia Severity Index. The calibration curve showed that the in-hospital mortality in severe pneumonia predicted by the model fit reasonably with the actual hospital mortality. In addition, the decision curve showed that the net clinical benefit was positive in both training and validation sets of hospitalised patients with severe pneumonia. Based on ensemble machine learning algorithms and logistic regression technique, the level of ferritin, lactic acid, blood urea nitrogen, creatine kinase, eosinophil and the requirement of vasopressors were identified as top independent predictors of in-hospital mortality with severe pneumonia.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>A robust clinical model for predicting the risk of in-hospital mortality after severe pneumonia was successfully developed using machine learning techniques. The performance of this model demonstrates the effectiveness of these techniques in creating accurate predictive models, and the use of this model has the potential to greatly assist patients and clinical doctors in making well-informed decisions regarding patient care.</p>","PeriodicalId":9048,"journal":{"name":"BMJ Open Respiratory Research","volume":"12 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11934410/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMJ Open Respiratory Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjresp-2023-001983","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"RESPIRATORY SYSTEM","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Severe pneumonia has a poor prognosis and high mortality. Current severity scores such as Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation (APACHE-II) and Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (SOFA), have limited ability to help clinicians in classification and management decisions. The goal of this study was to analyse the clinical characteristics of severe pneumonia and develop a machine learning-based mortality-prediction model for patients with severe pneumonia.

Methods: Consecutive patients with severe pneumonia between 2013 and 2022 admitted to Beijing Chaoyang Hospital affiliated with Capital Medical University were included. In-hospital all-cause mortality was the outcome of this study. We performed a retrospective analysis of the cohort, stratifying patients into survival and non-survival groups, using mainstream machine learning algorithms (light gradient boosting machine, support vector classifier and random forest). We aimed to construct a mortality-prediction model for patients with severe pneumonia based on their accessible clinical and laboratory data. The discriminative ability was evaluated using the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC). The calibration curve was used to assess the fit goodness of the model, and decision curve analysis was performed to quantify clinical utility. By means of logistic regression, independent risk factors for death in severe pneumonia were figured out to provide an important basis for clinical decision-making.

Results: A total of 875 patients were included in the development and validation cohorts, with the in-hospital mortality rate of 14.6%. The AUC of the model in the internal validation set was 0.8779 (95% CI, 0.738 to 0.974), showing a competitive discrimination ability that outperformed those of traditional clinical scoring systems, that is, APACHE-II, SOFA, CURB-65 (confusion, urea, respiratory rate, blood pressure, age ≥65 years), Pneumonia Severity Index. The calibration curve showed that the in-hospital mortality in severe pneumonia predicted by the model fit reasonably with the actual hospital mortality. In addition, the decision curve showed that the net clinical benefit was positive in both training and validation sets of hospitalised patients with severe pneumonia. Based on ensemble machine learning algorithms and logistic regression technique, the level of ferritin, lactic acid, blood urea nitrogen, creatine kinase, eosinophil and the requirement of vasopressors were identified as top independent predictors of in-hospital mortality with severe pneumonia.

Conclusion: A robust clinical model for predicting the risk of in-hospital mortality after severe pneumonia was successfully developed using machine learning techniques. The performance of this model demonstrates the effectiveness of these techniques in creating accurate predictive models, and the use of this model has the potential to greatly assist patients and clinical doctors in making well-informed decisions regarding patient care.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
基于机器学习的重症肺炎全因死亡率预测模型
背景:重症肺炎预后差、死亡率高。目前的严重程度评分,如急性生理学和慢性健康评估(APACHE-II)和序贯器官衰竭评估(SOFA),在帮助临床医生进行分类和管理决策方面能力有限。本研究旨在分析重症肺炎的临床特征,并为重症肺炎患者开发基于机器学习的死亡率预测模型:方法:纳入首都医科大学附属北京朝阳医院 2013 年至 2022 年期间收治的重症肺炎患者。院内全因死亡率是本研究的结果。我们使用主流机器学习算法(轻梯度提升机、支持向量分类器和随机森林)对队列进行了回顾性分析,将患者分为存活组和非存活组。我们的目标是根据可获得的临床和实验室数据,为重症肺炎患者构建一个死亡率预测模型。使用接收者工作特征曲线下面积(AUC)评估了判别能力。校准曲线用于评估模型的拟合优度,决策曲线分析用于量化临床效用。通过逻辑回归,找出重症肺炎死亡的独立风险因素,为临床决策提供重要依据:结果:开发组和验证组共纳入了 875 名患者,院内死亡率为 14.6%。该模型在内部验证组中的AUC为0.8779(95% CI,0.738至0.974),显示出优于传统临床评分系统(即APACHE-II、SOFA、CURB-65(混淆、尿素、呼吸频率、血压、年龄≥65岁)、肺炎严重程度指数)的竞争性判别能力。校准曲线显示,模型预测的重症肺炎院内死亡率与实际住院死亡率相当吻合。此外,决策曲线显示,在重症肺炎住院患者的训练集和验证集中,临床净获益均为正值。基于集合机器学习算法和逻辑回归技术,铁蛋白、乳酸、血尿素氮、肌酸激酶、嗜酸性粒细胞和血管加压剂需求水平被确定为重症肺炎住院死亡率的首要独立预测因素:结论:利用机器学习技术,成功开发出了一种预测重症肺炎院内死亡风险的可靠临床模型。该模型的表现证明了这些技术在创建精确预测模型方面的有效性,而且该模型的使用有可能极大地帮助患者和临床医生在患者护理方面做出明智的决定。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
BMJ Open Respiratory Research
BMJ Open Respiratory Research RESPIRATORY SYSTEM-
CiteScore
6.60
自引率
2.40%
发文量
95
审稿时长
12 weeks
期刊介绍: BMJ Open Respiratory Research is a peer-reviewed, open access journal publishing respiratory and critical care medicine. It is the sister journal to Thorax and co-owned by the British Thoracic Society and BMJ. The journal focuses on robustness of methodology and scientific rigour with less emphasis on novelty or perceived impact. BMJ Open Respiratory Research operates a rapid review process, with continuous publication online, ensuring timely, up-to-date research is available worldwide. The journal publishes review articles and all research study types: Basic science including laboratory based experiments and animal models, Pilot studies or proof of concept, Observational studies, Study protocols, Registries, Clinical trials from phase I to multicentre randomised clinical trials, Systematic reviews and meta-analyses.
期刊最新文献
Sociodemographic differences in clinical phenotypes among patients with COPD: a latent class analysis. Characterisation of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) in never-smokers and ever-smokers from a population-based cohort. Functional, radiological and survival outcomes in rheumatoid arthritis-associated interstitial lung disease: 24-month results from the BERTHA prospective cohort. Community-based prediction models of cardiovascular events, acute exacerbations and all-cause mortality in individuals with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: a systematic review and meta-analysis on behalf of the International Cardiovascular and Respiratory Alliance. Post-TB care in the UK: a national survey of existing practice.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1