The Safety and Efficacy of Anticancer Therapy in Breast Cancer Patients with Liver Cirrhosis.

IF 2.6 4区 医学 Q3 ONCOLOGY Cancer Management and Research Pub Date : 2025-03-19 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.2147/CMAR.S503109
Zhan-Yi Li, Yuan Teng, Chen-Meng Long, Ren-Bin Liu, Yu Liu
{"title":"The Safety and Efficacy of Anticancer Therapy in Breast Cancer Patients with Liver Cirrhosis.","authors":"Zhan-Yi Li, Yuan Teng, Chen-Meng Long, Ren-Bin Liu, Yu Liu","doi":"10.2147/CMAR.S503109","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Special populations are not enrolled in randomized clinical trials, and their safety and efficacy of anticancer therapy are not well described. We aimed to assess the safety and efficacy of anticancer therapy in breast cancer (BC) patients with cirrhosis.</p><p><strong>Patients and methods: </strong>We performed a retrospective case-control study (1:5) to assess the adverse events (AEs) morbidity and mortality of anticancer therapy in BC patients with cirrhosis based on a review of patients' medical records.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We included 26 BC patients with cirrhosis and 130 matched BC patients without cirrhosis. Postoperative morbidity was higher in the group with cirrhosis (26.9% vs 6.9%, P = 0.007) when postoperative mortality was not significance (3.8% vs 0%, P = 0.167). Liver toxicity (73.1% vs 26.9%, P < 0.001) was more frequent in the group with cirrhosis. The incidence of disruption and mortality during chemotherapy was higher in the group with cirrhosis (46.2% vs 3.1%, P < 0.001 and 15.4% vs 0%, P = 0.001, respectively). The 2-year recurrence rate and 2-year metastasis rate were higher in the group with cirrhosis (19.0% vs 3.8%, P = 0.022 and 23.8% vs 6.9%, P = 0.028). Cirrhosis was the risk factor for liver metastasis (OR: 17.326, 95% CI: 2.164-138.707, P=0.007).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>It is safe for BC patients with compensated cirrhosis to accept surgery. But they are vulnerable to AEs, disruptions and death during chemotherapy and have poor prognosis. Multidisciplinary cooperation before therapy and closely monitoring AEs during therapy are critical. Attention should be given to optimize the prognosis of special BC patients.</p>","PeriodicalId":9479,"journal":{"name":"Cancer Management and Research","volume":"17 ","pages":"639-650"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11930243/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cancer Management and Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2147/CMAR.S503109","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: Special populations are not enrolled in randomized clinical trials, and their safety and efficacy of anticancer therapy are not well described. We aimed to assess the safety and efficacy of anticancer therapy in breast cancer (BC) patients with cirrhosis.

Patients and methods: We performed a retrospective case-control study (1:5) to assess the adverse events (AEs) morbidity and mortality of anticancer therapy in BC patients with cirrhosis based on a review of patients' medical records.

Results: We included 26 BC patients with cirrhosis and 130 matched BC patients without cirrhosis. Postoperative morbidity was higher in the group with cirrhosis (26.9% vs 6.9%, P = 0.007) when postoperative mortality was not significance (3.8% vs 0%, P = 0.167). Liver toxicity (73.1% vs 26.9%, P < 0.001) was more frequent in the group with cirrhosis. The incidence of disruption and mortality during chemotherapy was higher in the group with cirrhosis (46.2% vs 3.1%, P < 0.001 and 15.4% vs 0%, P = 0.001, respectively). The 2-year recurrence rate and 2-year metastasis rate were higher in the group with cirrhosis (19.0% vs 3.8%, P = 0.022 and 23.8% vs 6.9%, P = 0.028). Cirrhosis was the risk factor for liver metastasis (OR: 17.326, 95% CI: 2.164-138.707, P=0.007).

Conclusion: It is safe for BC patients with compensated cirrhosis to accept surgery. But they are vulnerable to AEs, disruptions and death during chemotherapy and have poor prognosis. Multidisciplinary cooperation before therapy and closely monitoring AEs during therapy are critical. Attention should be given to optimize the prognosis of special BC patients.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
乳腺癌合并肝硬化患者抗癌治疗的安全性和有效性。
目的:特殊人群未纳入随机临床试验,其抗癌治疗的安全性和有效性尚未得到很好的描述。我们的目的是评估乳腺癌合并肝硬化患者抗癌治疗的安全性和有效性。患者和方法:我们进行了一项回顾性病例对照研究(1:5),在回顾患者医疗记录的基础上,评估BC合并肝硬化患者抗癌治疗的不良事件(ae)发病率和死亡率。结果:我们纳入了26例合并肝硬化的BC患者和130例匹配的无肝硬化的BC患者。肝硬化组术后发病率较高(26.9% vs 6.9%, P = 0.007),术后死亡率无统计学意义(3.8% vs 0%, P = 0.167)。肝毒性(73.1% vs 26.9%, P < 0.001)在肝硬化组更常见。化疗期间中断发生率和死亡率在肝硬化组较高(分别为46.2%对3.1%,P < 0.001和15.4%对0%,P = 0.001)。肝硬化组2年复发率和2年转移率较高(19.0%比3.8%,P = 0.022; 23.8%比6.9%,P = 0.028)。肝硬化是肝转移的危险因素(OR: 17.326, 95% CI: 2.164 ~ 138.707, P=0.007)。结论:BC合并代偿性肝硬化患者接受手术治疗是安全的。但它们在化疗期间容易发生不良反应、破坏和死亡,预后差。治疗前多学科合作和治疗期间密切监测不良事件至关重要。应注意优化特殊BC患者的预后。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Cancer Management and Research
Cancer Management and Research Medicine-Oncology
CiteScore
7.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
448
审稿时长
16 weeks
期刊介绍: Cancer Management and Research is an international, peer reviewed, open access journal focusing on cancer research and the optimal use of preventative and integrated treatment interventions to achieve improved outcomes, enhanced survival, and quality of life for cancer patients. Specific topics covered in the journal include: ◦Epidemiology, detection and screening ◦Cellular research and biomarkers ◦Identification of biotargets and agents with novel mechanisms of action ◦Optimal clinical use of existing anticancer agents, including combination therapies ◦Radiation and surgery ◦Palliative care ◦Patient adherence, quality of life, satisfaction The journal welcomes submitted papers covering original research, basic science, clinical & epidemiological studies, reviews & evaluations, guidelines, expert opinion and commentary, and case series that shed novel insights on a disease or disease subtype.
期刊最新文献
Vitamin D Receptor in Cancer: Biological Functions, Mechanistic Insights, and Clinical Relevance. Rhabdomyolysis as a Predominant Multisystem Serious Immune-Related Adverse Event Induced by Sintilimab: A Case Report and Literature Review. Analysis of Efficacy and Survival Prognosis for Astragalus Polysaccharide Injection as Adjuvant Therapy in Non - Small Cell Lung Cancer: A Propensity Score Matching - Based Study. Alcohol Use, Coronary Heart Disease and Hypertension Modify the Predictive Accuracy of Pre-Operative CEA for TNM Staging in Chinese Colorectal Cancer Patients. Cross-Lag Analysis of Prognostic Nutritional Index and Psychosomatic Symptom Clusters in Patients with Lung Cancer: A Longitudinal Study.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1