Impact of face masks on empathy and communication in head and neck cancer patients: a case-control study.

IF 3.5 3区 医学 Q2 ONCOLOGY Frontiers in Oncology Pub Date : 2025-03-07 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.3389/fonc.2025.1539070
Georg Hoene, Nikolaus von Hahn, Tim Mathea, Boris Schminke, Kathi Goldstein, Martin Leu, Henning Schliephake, Susanne Wolfer
{"title":"Impact of face masks on empathy and communication in head and neck cancer patients: a case-control study.","authors":"Georg Hoene, Nikolaus von Hahn, Tim Mathea, Boris Schminke, Kathi Goldstein, Martin Leu, Henning Schliephake, Susanne Wolfer","doi":"10.3389/fonc.2025.1539070","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The COVID-19 pandemic necessitated the widespread use of face masks in medical settings. In the treatment of patients with head and neck tumors or other malignancies, where non-verbal communication and emotional expression are critical, face masks may potentially impair the physician-patient relationship. This study aimed to assess the impact of face masks on perceived empathy and the quality of physician-patient communication in this patient cohort.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A prospective case-control study as part of the postoperative follow-up consultations was conducted at the Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, University Medical Center Goettingen, utilizing the Consultation and Relational Empathy (CARE) measure. Patients were divided into two groups: in the case group, clinicians wore face masks throughout the entire consultation, while in the control group, masks were worn only during the clinical examination. The primary outcome was the difference in CARE scores, reflecting the perceived empathy of the clinician.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>No significant difference in mean CARE scores was observed between the two groups (p=0.454), indicating that wearing a face mask did not significantly affect patients' perception of clinician empathy. However, a significant positive correlation was found between patients' familiarity with the clinician and higher CARE scores (p=0.003). Other variables, such as patient health status and consultation duration, did not significantly influence CARE scores.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Wearing face masks does not significantly impair perceived empathy in the context of physician-patient communication. Familiarity with the clinician emerged as a key factor in enhancing the quality of the interaction. These findings underscore the importance of fostering long-term, trust-based physician-patient relationships, particularly during periods of pandemic-related protective measures such as mask mandates.</p>","PeriodicalId":12482,"journal":{"name":"Frontiers in Oncology","volume":"15 ","pages":"1539070"},"PeriodicalIF":3.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11926156/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Frontiers in Oncology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3389/fonc.2025.1539070","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: The COVID-19 pandemic necessitated the widespread use of face masks in medical settings. In the treatment of patients with head and neck tumors or other malignancies, where non-verbal communication and emotional expression are critical, face masks may potentially impair the physician-patient relationship. This study aimed to assess the impact of face masks on perceived empathy and the quality of physician-patient communication in this patient cohort.

Methods: A prospective case-control study as part of the postoperative follow-up consultations was conducted at the Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, University Medical Center Goettingen, utilizing the Consultation and Relational Empathy (CARE) measure. Patients were divided into two groups: in the case group, clinicians wore face masks throughout the entire consultation, while in the control group, masks were worn only during the clinical examination. The primary outcome was the difference in CARE scores, reflecting the perceived empathy of the clinician.

Results: No significant difference in mean CARE scores was observed between the two groups (p=0.454), indicating that wearing a face mask did not significantly affect patients' perception of clinician empathy. However, a significant positive correlation was found between patients' familiarity with the clinician and higher CARE scores (p=0.003). Other variables, such as patient health status and consultation duration, did not significantly influence CARE scores.

Conclusion: Wearing face masks does not significantly impair perceived empathy in the context of physician-patient communication. Familiarity with the clinician emerged as a key factor in enhancing the quality of the interaction. These findings underscore the importance of fostering long-term, trust-based physician-patient relationships, particularly during periods of pandemic-related protective measures such as mask mandates.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
口罩对头颈癌患者共情和沟通的影响:一项病例对照研究
背景:2019冠状病毒病大流行要求在医疗环境中广泛使用口罩。在头颈部肿瘤或其他恶性肿瘤患者的治疗中,非语言交流和情感表达是至关重要的,口罩可能会损害医患关系。本研究旨在评估口罩对患者共情感知和医患沟通质量的影响。方法:在哥廷根大学医学中心口腔颌面外科进行一项前瞻性病例对照研究,作为术后随访咨询的一部分,采用咨询和关系共情(CARE)措施。患者被分为两组:病例组临床医生在整个咨询过程中都戴口罩,而对照组仅在临床检查时戴口罩。主要结果是CARE评分的差异,反映了临床医生感知到的同理心。结果:两组患者CARE平均评分差异无统计学意义(p=0.454),说明佩戴口罩对患者对临床医生共情的感知无显著影响。然而,患者对临床医生的熟悉程度与较高的CARE评分之间存在显著的正相关(p=0.003)。其他变量,如患者健康状况和会诊时间,对CARE评分没有显著影响。结论:在医患沟通中,戴口罩对共情感知没有显著影响。熟悉临床医生成为提高互动质量的关键因素。这些发现强调了培养长期的、基于信任的医患关系的重要性,特别是在与大流行有关的保护措施(如戴口罩)实施期间。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Frontiers in Oncology
Frontiers in Oncology Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology-Cancer Research
CiteScore
6.20
自引率
10.60%
发文量
6641
审稿时长
14 weeks
期刊介绍: Cancer Imaging and Diagnosis is dedicated to the publication of results from clinical and research studies applied to cancer diagnosis and treatment. The section aims to publish studies from the entire field of cancer imaging: results from routine use of clinical imaging in both radiology and nuclear medicine, results from clinical trials, experimental molecular imaging in humans and small animals, research on new contrast agents in CT, MRI, ultrasound, publication of new technical applications and processing algorithms to improve the standardization of quantitative imaging and image guided interventions for the diagnosis and treatment of cancer.
期刊最新文献
CT-based intratumoral habitat and peritumoral radiomics model to predict spread through air spaces in solid lung adenocarcinoma with diameter ≤ 2 cm: a dual-center study. A machine learning-based predictive model for postoperative pulmonary complications in lung cancer and its SHAP interpretation. Extramedullary plasmacytoma of the thyroid: a case report and literature review. Impact of frailty on adverse outcomes after radical cystectomy: a systematic review and meta-analysis. A pathological classification for predicting recurrence and guiding adjuvant therapy in esophageal squamous cell carcinoma following neoadjuvant immunochemotherapy: a two-center cohort study.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1