{"title":"Palliative Care Program Characteristics and End-of-Life Outcomes for Patients with Metastatic Cancer.","authors":"May Hua, Ling Guo, Shuang Wang, R Sean Morrison","doi":"10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2025.03.020","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Context: </strong>Although U.S. palliative care programs have substantial differences in their implementation, whether this heterogeneity impacts patient outcomes is unknown.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To determine if palliative care program characteristics are associated with differences in end-of-life quality metrics for patients with metastatic cancer.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Retrospective cohort study of patients with metastatic cancer who received care from programs that participated in the National Palliative Care Registry, 2018-2019. Multilevel regression was used to examine the association between individual program characteristics and outcomes including use of hospice, hospice enrollment ≥ 3 days, use of intensive care (ICU) in the last 30 days of life, and use of chemotherapy in the last 14 days of life.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The cohort was comprised of 33,015 patients who received care from 235 palliative care programs. Program maturity was the only characteristic associated with a difference in any outcome. Patients who received care from mature programs were more likely to use hospice (adjusted hazard ratio (aHR) 1.15 [1.06-1.25], for 5-10 years vs. < 5 years; aHR 1.18 [1.09-1.29] for > 10 years vs. < 5 years), and were also more likely to have hospice enrollment ≥ 3 days (aHR 1.18 [1.08-1.31] for 5 - 10 years vs. < 5 years; aHR 1.22 [1.11-1.34] for > 10 years vs.< 5 years).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Palliative care program characteristics largely were not associated with differences in end-of-life quality metrics for patients with metastatic cancer. Further work is needed to better understand why program maturity may be associated with improved outcomes.</p>","PeriodicalId":16634,"journal":{"name":"Journal of pain and symptom management","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of pain and symptom management","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2025.03.020","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Context: Although U.S. palliative care programs have substantial differences in their implementation, whether this heterogeneity impacts patient outcomes is unknown.
Objectives: To determine if palliative care program characteristics are associated with differences in end-of-life quality metrics for patients with metastatic cancer.
Methods: Retrospective cohort study of patients with metastatic cancer who received care from programs that participated in the National Palliative Care Registry, 2018-2019. Multilevel regression was used to examine the association between individual program characteristics and outcomes including use of hospice, hospice enrollment ≥ 3 days, use of intensive care (ICU) in the last 30 days of life, and use of chemotherapy in the last 14 days of life.
Results: The cohort was comprised of 33,015 patients who received care from 235 palliative care programs. Program maturity was the only characteristic associated with a difference in any outcome. Patients who received care from mature programs were more likely to use hospice (adjusted hazard ratio (aHR) 1.15 [1.06-1.25], for 5-10 years vs. < 5 years; aHR 1.18 [1.09-1.29] for > 10 years vs. < 5 years), and were also more likely to have hospice enrollment ≥ 3 days (aHR 1.18 [1.08-1.31] for 5 - 10 years vs. < 5 years; aHR 1.22 [1.11-1.34] for > 10 years vs.< 5 years).
Conclusion: Palliative care program characteristics largely were not associated with differences in end-of-life quality metrics for patients with metastatic cancer. Further work is needed to better understand why program maturity may be associated with improved outcomes.
期刊介绍:
The Journal of Pain and Symptom Management is an internationally respected, peer-reviewed journal and serves an interdisciplinary audience of professionals by providing a forum for the publication of the latest clinical research and best practices related to the relief of illness burden among patients afflicted with serious or life-threatening illness.