Telephone-Guided Sleep Restriction for Insomnia: A Randomized Sleep Diary-Controlled Trial.

IF 17.4 1区 医学 Q1 PSYCHIATRY Psychotherapy and Psychosomatics Pub Date : 2025-01-01 Epub Date: 2025-03-21 DOI:10.1159/000545138
Mathilde I Looman, Tessa F Blanken, Tim M Schoenmakers, Joyce E Reesen, Marieke Effting, Floris E Linnebank, Annemieke van Straten, Jan H Kamphuis, Jaap Lancee
{"title":"Telephone-Guided Sleep Restriction for Insomnia: A Randomized Sleep Diary-Controlled Trial.","authors":"Mathilde I Looman, Tessa F Blanken, Tim M Schoenmakers, Joyce E Reesen, Marieke Effting, Floris E Linnebank, Annemieke van Straten, Jan H Kamphuis, Jaap Lancee","doi":"10.1159/000545138","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Insomnia is common, but access to its first-line treatment, cognitive behavioral therapy for insomnia (CBT-I), is limited. To explore a scalable alternative, we investigated the efficacy of sleep restriction therapy (SRT), a core component of CBT-I, delivered via telephone.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In a randomized controlled trial, 147 adults with insomnia were allocated to 6 weeks of telephone-guided SRT (n = 76) or a sleep diary control group (n = 71). The SRT group received weekly supporting phone calls lasting 10-15 min. At baseline and posttest, we measured insomnia severity (primary outcome), sleep diary measures, anxiety symptoms, depressive symptoms, presleep arousal, sleep-safety behaviors, daytime sleepiness, and dysfunctional sleep-related cognitions (secondary outcomes). The SRT group repeated these measures at 3- and 6-month follow-ups.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Telephone-guided SRT showed large between-group effects on insomnia severity at posttest relative to the sleep diary control group (d = 1.52; p < 0.001). Based on intention-to-treat, 36 (47%) participants randomized to SRT achieved clinical improvement, and 23 (30%) achieved insomnia remission. We found medium-to-large between-group effects at posttest (d = 0.53-1.18) for all secondary outcomes except daytime sleepiness and total sleep time. At 3- and 6-month follow-ups, the primary and all secondary outcomes, including daytime sleepiness and total sleep time, improved relative to baseline within the SRT group (d = 0.50-1.93).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This trial shows that telephone-guided SRT is an effective insomnia treatment requiring minimal therapist guidance. If direct comparisons with CBT-I corroborate these findings, SRT could be an interesting scalable alternative to CBT-I as a first-line insomnia treatment.</p><p><strong>Trial registry: </strong>NCT05548907.</p>","PeriodicalId":20744,"journal":{"name":"Psychotherapy and Psychosomatics","volume":" ","pages":"147-161"},"PeriodicalIF":17.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12060811/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Psychotherapy and Psychosomatics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1159/000545138","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/3/21 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHIATRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Insomnia is common, but access to its first-line treatment, cognitive behavioral therapy for insomnia (CBT-I), is limited. To explore a scalable alternative, we investigated the efficacy of sleep restriction therapy (SRT), a core component of CBT-I, delivered via telephone.

Methods: In a randomized controlled trial, 147 adults with insomnia were allocated to 6 weeks of telephone-guided SRT (n = 76) or a sleep diary control group (n = 71). The SRT group received weekly supporting phone calls lasting 10-15 min. At baseline and posttest, we measured insomnia severity (primary outcome), sleep diary measures, anxiety symptoms, depressive symptoms, presleep arousal, sleep-safety behaviors, daytime sleepiness, and dysfunctional sleep-related cognitions (secondary outcomes). The SRT group repeated these measures at 3- and 6-month follow-ups.

Results: Telephone-guided SRT showed large between-group effects on insomnia severity at posttest relative to the sleep diary control group (d = 1.52; p < 0.001). Based on intention-to-treat, 36 (47%) participants randomized to SRT achieved clinical improvement, and 23 (30%) achieved insomnia remission. We found medium-to-large between-group effects at posttest (d = 0.53-1.18) for all secondary outcomes except daytime sleepiness and total sleep time. At 3- and 6-month follow-ups, the primary and all secondary outcomes, including daytime sleepiness and total sleep time, improved relative to baseline within the SRT group (d = 0.50-1.93).

Conclusion: This trial shows that telephone-guided SRT is an effective insomnia treatment requiring minimal therapist guidance. If direct comparisons with CBT-I corroborate these findings, SRT could be an interesting scalable alternative to CBT-I as a first-line insomnia treatment.

Trial registry: NCT05548907.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
电话引导睡眠限制失眠:一项随机睡眠日记对照试验。
简介:失眠是一种常见病,但其一线治疗方法--失眠认知行为疗法(CBT-I)却很有限。为了探索一种可扩展的替代方法,我们研究了通过电话提供的睡眠限制疗法(SRT)的疗效,该疗法是 CBT-I 的核心组成部分:在一项随机对照试验中,147 名成人失眠患者被分配到为期 6 周的电话指导 SRT 组(76 人)或睡眠日记对照组(71 人)。SRT组每周接受10至15分钟的电话支持。在基线和测试后,我们测量了失眠严重程度(主要结果)、睡眠日记测量、焦虑症状、抑郁症状、睡前唤醒、睡眠安全行为、白天嗜睡以及与睡眠相关的功能障碍认知(次要结果)。SRT组在3个月和6个月的随访中重复这些测量:与睡眠日记对照组相比,电话指导的 SRT 在测试后对失眠严重程度的组间影响较大(d = 1.52;p < .001)。根据意向治疗,36 名(47%)随机接受 SRT 治疗的参与者临床症状得到改善,23 名(30%)失眠症状得到缓解。我们发现,除白天嗜睡和总睡眠时间外,所有次要结果在测试后均有中等至较大的组间效应(d = 0.53 至 1.18)。在 3 个月和 6 个月的随访中,SRT 组的主要结果和所有次要结果,包括白天嗜睡和总睡眠时间,都比基线有所改善(d = 0.50 至 1.93):这项试验表明,电话指导下的 SRT 是一种有效的失眠治疗方法,只需治疗师提供最低限度的指导。如果与 CBT-I 的直接比较证实了这些发现,SRT 可能会成为 CBT-I 的一种有趣的可扩展替代疗法,作为一线失眠治疗方法:NCT05548907.
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Psychotherapy and Psychosomatics
Psychotherapy and Psychosomatics 医学-精神病学
CiteScore
29.40
自引率
6.10%
发文量
46
期刊介绍: Psychotherapy and Psychosomatics is a reputable journal that has been published since 1953. Over the years, it has gained recognition for its independence, originality, and methodological rigor. The journal has been at the forefront of research in psychosomatic medicine, psychotherapy research, and psychopharmacology, and has contributed to the development of new lines of research in these areas. It is now ranked among the world's most cited journals in the field. As the official journal of the International College of Psychosomatic Medicine and the World Federation for Psychotherapy, Psychotherapy and Psychosomatics serves as a platform for discussing current and controversial issues and showcasing innovations in assessment and treatment. It offers a unique forum for cutting-edge thinking at the intersection of medical and behavioral sciences, catering to both practicing clinicians and researchers. The journal is indexed in various databases and platforms such as PubMed, MEDLINE, Web of Science, Science Citation Index, Social Sciences Citation Index, Science Citation Index Expanded, BIOSIS Previews, Google Scholar, Academic Search, and Health Research Premium Collection, among others.
期刊最新文献
Mental Health AI Chatbots as Pharmakon: A Tripartite Theory of Use Despite Risk. A brief intervention for the treatment of anxiety in pregnancy. A pilot randomized controlled trial (The TAP study). A Large-Group 1-Day RCT Investigating the Effectiveness of Four Different Strategies to Promote the Outcome of Exposure Therapy in 519 Patients with Phobic Fear of Flying. Efficacy of a Stepped Care Approach for Adolescents and Adults with Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder (ADHD): An Adaptive Intervention Study Including Randomized Controlled Trials (ESCAlate). Methodological considerations, clinical implications, and future directions in individual participant data meta-analyses of psychotherapy for borderline personality disorder.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1