Mechanical properties and environmental impact assessments of GFRP rebar reinforced limestone calcinated clay cement (LC3) concrete

IF 8 1区 工程技术 Q1 CONSTRUCTION & BUILDING TECHNOLOGY Construction and Building Materials Pub Date : 2025-04-18 Epub Date: 2025-03-20 DOI:10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2025.140788
Peng Wang , Hongyu Lai , Wanye Li , Linyuwen Ke , Haoliang Wu , Weiwen Li , Christopher K.Y. Leung
{"title":"Mechanical properties and environmental impact assessments of GFRP rebar reinforced limestone calcinated clay cement (LC3) concrete","authors":"Peng Wang ,&nbsp;Hongyu Lai ,&nbsp;Wanye Li ,&nbsp;Linyuwen Ke ,&nbsp;Haoliang Wu ,&nbsp;Weiwen Li ,&nbsp;Christopher K.Y. Leung","doi":"10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2025.140788","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>To address global greenhouse emissions, the adoption of green concrete materials has surged, aiming to lower CO₂ emissions and energy use over their lifecycle. This study comprehensively investigates the time-dependent degradation of glass fiber reinforced polymer (GFRP) rebars embedded in limestone calcined clay cement (LC3) concrete under exposure to water baths at temperatures of 23, 40 and 60 °C for up to 270 days. Both macroscopic mechanical testing (compressive strength of concrete, tensile test, flexural test and inter-laminar shear test of GFRP rebar, and pull-out test of GFRP-concrete) and environmental impact assessment are conducted to gain deeper insights. The experimental findings indicate that, when compared to normal concrete (NC), LC3 exhibits reduced aggressiveness towards the embedded GFRP rebars due to its lower alkaline content. Nonetheless, GFRP rebars still experience fiber corrosion, matrix cracking, and fiber-matrix debonding as a result of an alkaline attack from LC3. It is observed that GFRP rebar embedded in LC3 exhibit notable characteristics: an enhanced retention of tensile strength, escalating from 71.4 % to 93.3 % concerning the initial value, a similar retention in flexural and inter-laminar shear strength, and elevated ultimate bond strength from 1.83 % to 20.75 % at the GFRP-concrete interface relative to NC counterpart under identical environmental conditions. Further, these phenomena are explained by the micromorphology of aged GFRP rebars. Environmental impact assessment results show that compared with GFRP-NC, the proposed GFRP-LC3 has a lower impact on the environment, with a reduction of 20.27 % and 34.53 % for energy consumption and CO<sub>2</sub> emissions, respectively. Considering the long-term mechanical properties and environmental impacts after degradation, GFRP-LC3 provides an effective approach for the sustainable development of construction.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":288,"journal":{"name":"Construction and Building Materials","volume":"472 ","pages":"Article 140788"},"PeriodicalIF":8.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Construction and Building Materials","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0950061825009365","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/3/20 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CONSTRUCTION & BUILDING TECHNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

To address global greenhouse emissions, the adoption of green concrete materials has surged, aiming to lower CO₂ emissions and energy use over their lifecycle. This study comprehensively investigates the time-dependent degradation of glass fiber reinforced polymer (GFRP) rebars embedded in limestone calcined clay cement (LC3) concrete under exposure to water baths at temperatures of 23, 40 and 60 °C for up to 270 days. Both macroscopic mechanical testing (compressive strength of concrete, tensile test, flexural test and inter-laminar shear test of GFRP rebar, and pull-out test of GFRP-concrete) and environmental impact assessment are conducted to gain deeper insights. The experimental findings indicate that, when compared to normal concrete (NC), LC3 exhibits reduced aggressiveness towards the embedded GFRP rebars due to its lower alkaline content. Nonetheless, GFRP rebars still experience fiber corrosion, matrix cracking, and fiber-matrix debonding as a result of an alkaline attack from LC3. It is observed that GFRP rebar embedded in LC3 exhibit notable characteristics: an enhanced retention of tensile strength, escalating from 71.4 % to 93.3 % concerning the initial value, a similar retention in flexural and inter-laminar shear strength, and elevated ultimate bond strength from 1.83 % to 20.75 % at the GFRP-concrete interface relative to NC counterpart under identical environmental conditions. Further, these phenomena are explained by the micromorphology of aged GFRP rebars. Environmental impact assessment results show that compared with GFRP-NC, the proposed GFRP-LC3 has a lower impact on the environment, with a reduction of 20.27 % and 34.53 % for energy consumption and CO2 emissions, respectively. Considering the long-term mechanical properties and environmental impacts after degradation, GFRP-LC3 provides an effective approach for the sustainable development of construction.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
GFRP筋增强石灰石煅烧粘土水泥(LC3)混凝土力学性能及环境影响评价
为了解决全球温室气体排放问题,绿色混凝土材料的采用激增,旨在降低其生命周期内的二氧化碳排放和能源消耗。本研究全面研究了嵌入石灰石煅烧粘土水泥(LC3)混凝土中的玻璃纤维增强聚合物(GFRP)钢筋在23,40和60°C的水浴中暴露270天的时间依赖性降解。通过宏观力学试验(混凝土抗压强度、GFRP钢筋拉伸试验、弯曲试验、层间剪切试验、GFRP-混凝土拉拔试验)和环境影响评价来获得更深入的认识。实验结果表明,与普通混凝土(NC)相比,LC3由于其较低的碱性含量,对预埋GFRP钢筋的侵蚀性降低。尽管如此,由于LC3的碱性侵蚀,GFRP钢筋仍然会经历纤维腐蚀、基体开裂和纤维-基体脱粘。研究发现,GFRP筋在LC3中嵌入表现出显著的特征:抗拉强度保持率增强,从初始值的71.4 %上升到93.3 %,弯曲和层间剪切强度保持率相似,GFRP-混凝土界面的极限粘结强度从1.83 %提高到20.75 %。此外,这些现象可以用老化GFRP筋的微观形貌来解释。环境影响评价结果表明,与GFRP-NC相比,GFRP-LC3对环境的影响较小,能耗和CO2排放量分别降低20.27 %和34.53 %。考虑到降解后的长期力学性能和环境影响,GFRP-LC3为建筑可持续发展提供了有效途径。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Construction and Building Materials
Construction and Building Materials 工程技术-材料科学:综合
CiteScore
13.80
自引率
21.60%
发文量
3632
审稿时长
82 days
期刊介绍: Construction and Building Materials offers an international platform for sharing innovative and original research and development in the realm of construction and building materials, along with their practical applications in new projects and repair practices. The journal publishes a diverse array of pioneering research and application papers, detailing laboratory investigations and, to a limited extent, numerical analyses or reports on full-scale projects. Multi-part papers are discouraged. Additionally, Construction and Building Materials features comprehensive case studies and insightful review articles that contribute to new insights in the field. Our focus is on papers related to construction materials, excluding those on structural engineering, geotechnics, and unbound highway layers. Covered materials and technologies encompass cement, concrete reinforcement, bricks and mortars, additives, corrosion technology, ceramics, timber, steel, polymers, glass fibers, recycled materials, bamboo, rammed earth, non-conventional building materials, bituminous materials, and applications in railway materials.
期刊最新文献
C–S–H/Na2SO4 interfacial interactions via molecular dynamics simulation and experiments Hemp shives vs. plastic waste vs. polypropylene fibers in perlite concrete: An experimental comparative study of mechanical performance Correlation-based evaluation of pozzolanic reactivity of supplementary cementitious materials using R³ , SAI, and chemical tests Integrity assessment of masonry dams using ground penetrating radar-based time-energy density approach Degradation mechanism of the bond interface between existing concrete and cast-in-situ repairing agent containing RCA under Mg2+-SO42- corrosion
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1