J. Del-Valle-Corte , P. Orosa , M. Aspilcueta , A.R. Pasandín , I. Pérez , J.E. Haddock
{"title":"Effects of classes C and F fly ashes on the viscoelastic behavior of cold mix asphalt (CMA)","authors":"J. Del-Valle-Corte , P. Orosa , M. Aspilcueta , A.R. Pasandín , I. Pérez , J.E. Haddock","doi":"10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2025.140796","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>To promote sustainability in the pavement industry, this study investigates how replacing traditional aggregate filler with Class C or Class F fly ashes impacts the mechanical and volumetric properties of cold mix asphalt (CMA). The mixture design phase involved determining the optimum fluid content, number of compaction gyrations, and residual asphalt binder content using the modified Proctor test, conducting a compaction study, and assessing the resistance to moisture-induced damage, in that order. Once the optimum parameters were established, three different trial mixtures were prepared and tested: a control (100 % traditional aggregate filler), FA-C (100 % Class C fly ash filler), and FA-F (100 % Class F fly ash filler). After determining the mixture volumetric properties, the mechanical behavior of each mixture was analyzed using the dynamic modulus tests. Mixture modeling included detailed analyses through Black space diagrams, master curve development, and model fitting. The findings reveal that incorporating Class C or Class F fly ash increases mixture stiffness, with the Class C mixture achieving up to 3 times, and the Class F mixture up to 1.5 times the stiffness of the control CMA at high temperatures. The 2S2P1D model effectively represents the complex modulus of all three mixtures. However, this is not the case for the mixture phase angles, as the addition of fly ashes adversely affects the model’s accuracy, resulting in greater discrepancies between the modeled and measured values.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":288,"journal":{"name":"Construction and Building Materials","volume":"472 ","pages":"Article 140796"},"PeriodicalIF":8.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Construction and Building Materials","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0950061825009444","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/3/19 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CONSTRUCTION & BUILDING TECHNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
To promote sustainability in the pavement industry, this study investigates how replacing traditional aggregate filler with Class C or Class F fly ashes impacts the mechanical and volumetric properties of cold mix asphalt (CMA). The mixture design phase involved determining the optimum fluid content, number of compaction gyrations, and residual asphalt binder content using the modified Proctor test, conducting a compaction study, and assessing the resistance to moisture-induced damage, in that order. Once the optimum parameters were established, three different trial mixtures were prepared and tested: a control (100 % traditional aggregate filler), FA-C (100 % Class C fly ash filler), and FA-F (100 % Class F fly ash filler). After determining the mixture volumetric properties, the mechanical behavior of each mixture was analyzed using the dynamic modulus tests. Mixture modeling included detailed analyses through Black space diagrams, master curve development, and model fitting. The findings reveal that incorporating Class C or Class F fly ash increases mixture stiffness, with the Class C mixture achieving up to 3 times, and the Class F mixture up to 1.5 times the stiffness of the control CMA at high temperatures. The 2S2P1D model effectively represents the complex modulus of all three mixtures. However, this is not the case for the mixture phase angles, as the addition of fly ashes adversely affects the model’s accuracy, resulting in greater discrepancies between the modeled and measured values.
期刊介绍:
Construction and Building Materials offers an international platform for sharing innovative and original research and development in the realm of construction and building materials, along with their practical applications in new projects and repair practices. The journal publishes a diverse array of pioneering research and application papers, detailing laboratory investigations and, to a limited extent, numerical analyses or reports on full-scale projects. Multi-part papers are discouraged.
Additionally, Construction and Building Materials features comprehensive case studies and insightful review articles that contribute to new insights in the field. Our focus is on papers related to construction materials, excluding those on structural engineering, geotechnics, and unbound highway layers. Covered materials and technologies encompass cement, concrete reinforcement, bricks and mortars, additives, corrosion technology, ceramics, timber, steel, polymers, glass fibers, recycled materials, bamboo, rammed earth, non-conventional building materials, bituminous materials, and applications in railway materials.