North-south relations, responsibilities, and agendas in Earth System Governance: Have these changed in the Anthropocene?

IF 4.6 Q1 ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES Earth System Governance Pub Date : 2025-03-25 DOI:10.1016/j.esg.2025.100251
Augusto Heras , Joyeeta Gupta
{"title":"North-south relations, responsibilities, and agendas in Earth System Governance: Have these changed in the Anthropocene?","authors":"Augusto Heras ,&nbsp;Joyeeta Gupta","doi":"10.1016/j.esg.2025.100251","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>On the G77's 60<sup>th</sup> anniversary and the 50<sup>th</sup> anniversary of the Declaration for a New International Economic Order, this paper explores the enduring complexities of North-South relations in development and climate governance. We ask: <em>What is the continuing relevance of the North-South narrative in Earth System Governance and climate change?</em> Utilising North-South literature, this paper examines these relations and responsibilities, emphasising the need to decolonise ESG by challenging entrenched power structures in climate governance. The analysis concludes: (a) the North-South dynamic is a flexible dichotomy reflecting the dominance of powerful nations/actors over the less powerful; (b) recurring patterns of North-South behaviour in controlling forums, agendas, and decisions marginalise Southern perspectives; and (c) such imbalances result in failures to govern ecological and social problems, while the North risks losing control over them. Without a more just approach addressing the North-South dichotomy, we all risk losing a stable and predictable climate.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":33685,"journal":{"name":"Earth System Governance","volume":"24 ","pages":"Article 100251"},"PeriodicalIF":4.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Earth System Governance","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2589811625000175","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

On the G77's 60th anniversary and the 50th anniversary of the Declaration for a New International Economic Order, this paper explores the enduring complexities of North-South relations in development and climate governance. We ask: What is the continuing relevance of the North-South narrative in Earth System Governance and climate change? Utilising North-South literature, this paper examines these relations and responsibilities, emphasising the need to decolonise ESG by challenging entrenched power structures in climate governance. The analysis concludes: (a) the North-South dynamic is a flexible dichotomy reflecting the dominance of powerful nations/actors over the less powerful; (b) recurring patterns of North-South behaviour in controlling forums, agendas, and decisions marginalise Southern perspectives; and (c) such imbalances result in failures to govern ecological and social problems, while the North risks losing control over them. Without a more just approach addressing the North-South dichotomy, we all risk losing a stable and predictable climate.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
地球系统治理中的南北关系、责任和议程:这些在人类世发生了变化吗?
在77国集团成立60周年和《国际经济新秩序宣言》发表50周年之际,本文探讨了南北关系在发展和气候治理方面的长期复杂性。我们的问题是:南北叙事在地球系统治理和气候变化方面的持续相关性是什么?利用南北文献,本文考察了这些关系和责任,强调需要通过挑战气候治理中根深蒂固的权力结构来实现ESG的非殖民化。分析的结论是:(a)南北动态是一种灵活的二分法,反映了强国/行动者对弱国的支配地位;(b)南北在控制论坛、议程和决定方面反复出现的行为模式使南方的观点边缘化;(c)这种不平衡导致无法治理生态和社会问题,而北方可能失去对这些问题的控制。如果没有一种更公正的方法来解决南北对立,我们都有可能失去稳定和可预测的气候。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
9.00
自引率
14.30%
发文量
31
审稿时长
35 weeks
期刊最新文献
From 'Predict and Provide' towards 'Reduce Demand': institutionalising Wellbeing Economy discourse in Welsh transport policy Navigating just transitions: Trade union strategies and climate delay in North Sea energy politics Explaining Ethiopia’s engagement in multilateral climate transparency arrangements: Why engage and with what implications for domestic climate action? Framing analysis of Japan and China's response to Fukushima water discharge: Technical rationality vs local experience Corporate earth system accountability: Governance strategies to reduce microplastic pollution from consumer products
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1