Two-year survival and disease recurrence after endosonography with or without confirmatory mediastinoscopy for resectable lung cancer (a short communication of the MEDIASTrial follow-up)

IF 4.4 2区 医学 Q1 ONCOLOGY Lung Cancer Pub Date : 2025-03-22 DOI:10.1016/j.lungcan.2025.108462
Jelle E. Bousema , Louisa N. Spaans , Marcel G.W. Dijkgraaf , Erik H.F.M. van der Heijden , Ad F.T.M. Verhagen , Jouke T. Annema , Frank J.C. van den Broek
{"title":"Two-year survival and disease recurrence after endosonography with or without confirmatory mediastinoscopy for resectable lung cancer (a short communication of the MEDIASTrial follow-up)","authors":"Jelle E. Bousema ,&nbsp;Louisa N. Spaans ,&nbsp;Marcel G.W. Dijkgraaf ,&nbsp;Erik H.F.M. van der Heijden ,&nbsp;Ad F.T.M. Verhagen ,&nbsp;Jouke T. Annema ,&nbsp;Frank J.C. van den Broek","doi":"10.1016/j.lungcan.2025.108462","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Resectable non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) with increased risk of mediastinal nodal involvement requires invasive staging prior to surgical resection. The MEDIASTrial was a multicenter non-inferiority trial randomly assigning patients after negative endosonography to immediate lung tumor resection (n = 178) or to mediastinoscopy first (n = 182), only followed by tumor resection after negative mediastinoscopy. The omission of confirmatory mediastinoscopy after negative endosonography led to a clinically negligible and non-inferior increase in unforeseen N2.</div><div>We report the two-year overall and disease-free survival (OS and DFS) and the health-related quality-of-life (HRQoL) gathered with the QLQ-C30 and QLQ-LC13 questionnaires.</div><div>After randomization seven drop-outs were observed in both groups. Time to 80 % OS was 25 months in the immediate resection group versus 20 months in the mediastinoscopy group (adjusted HR 0.8, 95 % CI: 0.5–1.3). Time to 65 % DFS was 25 months in the immediate resection group versus 25 months in the mediastinoscopy group (adjusted HR 0.9, 95 % CI: 0.6–1.4). The HRQoL scores were comparable among the groups during the two-year follow-up.</div><div>The loss in diagnostic yield by omitting confirmatory mediastinoscopy after negative systematic endosonography has no impact on two-year OS, DFS and HRQoL in patients with resectable NSCLC and an indication for invasive mediastinal nodal staging.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":18129,"journal":{"name":"Lung Cancer","volume":"202 ","pages":"Article 108462"},"PeriodicalIF":4.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Lung Cancer","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S016950022500354X","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Resectable non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) with increased risk of mediastinal nodal involvement requires invasive staging prior to surgical resection. The MEDIASTrial was a multicenter non-inferiority trial randomly assigning patients after negative endosonography to immediate lung tumor resection (n = 178) or to mediastinoscopy first (n = 182), only followed by tumor resection after negative mediastinoscopy. The omission of confirmatory mediastinoscopy after negative endosonography led to a clinically negligible and non-inferior increase in unforeseen N2.
We report the two-year overall and disease-free survival (OS and DFS) and the health-related quality-of-life (HRQoL) gathered with the QLQ-C30 and QLQ-LC13 questionnaires.
After randomization seven drop-outs were observed in both groups. Time to 80 % OS was 25 months in the immediate resection group versus 20 months in the mediastinoscopy group (adjusted HR 0.8, 95 % CI: 0.5–1.3). Time to 65 % DFS was 25 months in the immediate resection group versus 25 months in the mediastinoscopy group (adjusted HR 0.9, 95 % CI: 0.6–1.4). The HRQoL scores were comparable among the groups during the two-year follow-up.
The loss in diagnostic yield by omitting confirmatory mediastinoscopy after negative systematic endosonography has no impact on two-year OS, DFS and HRQoL in patients with resectable NSCLC and an indication for invasive mediastinal nodal staging.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
可切除肺癌患者接受或不接受纵隔镜检查后的两年生存率和疾病复发率(MEDIAST 试验随访简讯)
可切除的非小细胞肺癌(NSCLC)纵隔结节受累风险较高,需要在手术切除前进行侵入性分期。MEDIAST试验是一项多中心非劣效性试验,随机分配内镜检查阴性的患者立即进行肺部肿瘤切除术(n = 178)或先进行纵隔镜检查(n = 182),纵隔镜检查阴性后再进行肿瘤切除术。我们报告了两年的总生存期和无病生存期(OS和DFS),以及通过QLQ-C30和QLQ-LC13问卷调查获得的与健康相关的生活质量(HRQoL)。即刻切除术组的80%OS时间为25个月,而纵隔镜手术组为20个月(调整后HR为0.8,95% CI:0.5-1.3)。即刻切除术组的 65% DFS 为 25 个月,而纵隔镜手术组为 25 个月(调整后 HR 为 0.9,95 % CI 为 0.6-1.4)。在两年的随访中,各组的 HRQoL 评分相当。对于可切除 NSCLC 且有纵隔结节有创分期指征的患者来说,在系统性内窥镜检查阴性后省略纵隔镜确诊所造成的诊断率损失对两年的 OS、DFS 和 HRQoL 没有影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Lung Cancer
Lung Cancer 医学-呼吸系统
CiteScore
9.40
自引率
3.80%
发文量
407
审稿时长
25 days
期刊介绍: Lung Cancer is an international publication covering the clinical, translational and basic science of malignancies of the lung and chest region.Original research articles, early reports, review articles, editorials and correspondence covering the prevention, epidemiology and etiology, basic biology, pathology, clinical assessment, surgery, chemotherapy, radiotherapy, combined treatment modalities, other treatment modalities and outcomes of lung cancer are welcome.
期刊最新文献
Comparative efficacy and safety of post-TKI treatments for advanced EGFR-mutant non-small-cell lung cancer: a systematic review and network meta-analysis Letter to the editor: treatment sequencing in synchronous oligometastatic NSCLC − the need for standardized patient selection Criteria Survival outcomes of patients with uncommon EGFR mutations in surgically resected lung adenocarcinoma: A multi-institutional real-world database study (CReGYT-01 EGFR study) Multi-omic screening for pleural mesothelioma in Asbestos-Exposed Populations: A literature review and Recommendations Contents
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1