Autonomy as empowerment: A taxonomic framework for analyzing energy autonomy in local flexibility markets

IF 11 1区 工程技术 Q1 ENERGY & FUELS Applied Energy Pub Date : 2025-03-25 DOI:10.1016/j.apenergy.2025.125777
Mehdi Foroughi , Matin Bagherpour , Frank Eliassen , Rahmatallah Poudineh
{"title":"Autonomy as empowerment: A taxonomic framework for analyzing energy autonomy in local flexibility markets","authors":"Mehdi Foroughi ,&nbsp;Matin Bagherpour ,&nbsp;Frank Eliassen ,&nbsp;Rahmatallah Poudineh","doi":"10.1016/j.apenergy.2025.125777","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Decentralized energy management in energy systems has led to the rise of the Local Flexibility Market (LFM). This market enables active prosumer participation at local levels, facilitating distributed flexibility resources and grid optimization. At its core, the LFM’s fundamental value resides in enabling energy autonomy, enabling prosumers to actively manage and exchange their flexibile resources. However, the concept of energy autonomy remains rooted in outdated notions of passive consumption and self-sufficiency. This traditional understanding hinders the full potential of these developments. Therefore, modern energy systems face a fundamental challenge: an outdated understanding of autonomy. The lack of a standardized contemporary definition of energy autonomy impedes effective comparison, selection, and regulation of autonomous solutions. To address this challenge, this paper develops a comprehensive framework with two key elements: a redefinition of energy autonomy and a multidimensional taxonomy for standardization. The focus is on the LFM, as this market leads the way in local energy trading and prosumer engagement. The framework serves as a tool to examine four key areas: communication, control, physical infrastructure, and learning. Through novel terminology and tailored metrics, it provides the structure to evaluate autonomy across market structures while accounting for their varying complexity and participant interactions. The framework was validated through an analysis of four leading LFM projects. This evaluation identified four key barriers to market development. First, regulatory frameworks suffer from ambiguous language. Second, current investment priorities remain narrowly focused. Third, automated systems lack sufficient explainability. Fourth, market access continues to limit aggregator participation. Accordingly, this work’s contribution is a transformative understanding of modern energy autonomy paradigms. These insights support decision-making in policy development, market design, and regulatory framework.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":246,"journal":{"name":"Applied Energy","volume":"389 ","pages":"Article 125777"},"PeriodicalIF":11.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Applied Energy","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0306261925005070","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENERGY & FUELS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Decentralized energy management in energy systems has led to the rise of the Local Flexibility Market (LFM). This market enables active prosumer participation at local levels, facilitating distributed flexibility resources and grid optimization. At its core, the LFM’s fundamental value resides in enabling energy autonomy, enabling prosumers to actively manage and exchange their flexibile resources. However, the concept of energy autonomy remains rooted in outdated notions of passive consumption and self-sufficiency. This traditional understanding hinders the full potential of these developments. Therefore, modern energy systems face a fundamental challenge: an outdated understanding of autonomy. The lack of a standardized contemporary definition of energy autonomy impedes effective comparison, selection, and regulation of autonomous solutions. To address this challenge, this paper develops a comprehensive framework with two key elements: a redefinition of energy autonomy and a multidimensional taxonomy for standardization. The focus is on the LFM, as this market leads the way in local energy trading and prosumer engagement. The framework serves as a tool to examine four key areas: communication, control, physical infrastructure, and learning. Through novel terminology and tailored metrics, it provides the structure to evaluate autonomy across market structures while accounting for their varying complexity and participant interactions. The framework was validated through an analysis of four leading LFM projects. This evaluation identified four key barriers to market development. First, regulatory frameworks suffer from ambiguous language. Second, current investment priorities remain narrowly focused. Third, automated systems lack sufficient explainability. Fourth, market access continues to limit aggregator participation. Accordingly, this work’s contribution is a transformative understanding of modern energy autonomy paradigms. These insights support decision-making in policy development, market design, and regulatory framework.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
自主即赋权:分析地方灵活性市场中能源自主性的分类框架
能源系统中的分散能源管理导致了本地灵活性市场(LFM)的兴起。这个市场使本地的生产消费者能够积极参与,促进分布式灵活性资源和电网优化。在其核心,LFM的基本价值在于实现能源自主,使生产消费者能够积极管理和交换他们的灵活资源。然而,能源自主的概念仍然植根于被动消费和自给自足的过时观念。这种传统的理解阻碍了这些发展的充分潜力。因此,现代能源系统面临着一个根本性的挑战:对自主性的过时理解。缺乏对能源自主的标准化定义阻碍了对自主解决方案的有效比较、选择和监管。为了应对这一挑战,本文开发了一个包含两个关键要素的综合框架:能源自主的重新定义和标准化的多维分类。重点是LFM,因为这个市场在当地能源交易和消费者参与方面处于领先地位。该框架作为检查四个关键领域的工具:通信、控制、物理基础设施和学习。通过新颖的术语和定制的指标,它提供了一种结构来评估跨市场结构的自主性,同时考虑到它们不同的复杂性和参与者的相互作用。通过对四个主要的LFM项目的分析,验证了该框架。这项评价确定了市场发展的四个主要障碍。首先,监管框架存在措辞含糊的问题。其次,目前的投资重点仍然很狭隘。第三,自动化系统缺乏足够的可解释性。第四,市场准入继续限制聚合商的参与。因此,这项工作的贡献是对现代能源自主范式的变革性理解。这些见解支持政策制定、市场设计和监管框架方面的决策。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Applied Energy
Applied Energy 工程技术-工程:化工
CiteScore
21.20
自引率
10.70%
发文量
1830
审稿时长
41 days
期刊介绍: Applied Energy serves as a platform for sharing innovations, research, development, and demonstrations in energy conversion, conservation, and sustainable energy systems. The journal covers topics such as optimal energy resource use, environmental pollutant mitigation, and energy process analysis. It welcomes original papers, review articles, technical notes, and letters to the editor. Authors are encouraged to submit manuscripts that bridge the gap between research, development, and implementation. The journal addresses a wide spectrum of topics, including fossil and renewable energy technologies, energy economics, and environmental impacts. Applied Energy also explores modeling and forecasting, conservation strategies, and the social and economic implications of energy policies, including climate change mitigation. It is complemented by the open-access journal Advances in Applied Energy.
期刊最新文献
Nationwide insights on solar deployment trends and spatial inequalities revealed by vision transformer models Decision-focused learning integrated with data-driven robust optimization for energy management A capacity renting framework for shared energy storage considering peer-to-peer energy trading among prosumers with privacy protection A comprehensive review of deep learning for solar nowcasting: Enhancing accuracy, reliability, and interpretability Aligning quantum kernels for detecting false data injection attacks in power systems
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1