The advantages of reheated and intercooled gas turbines for combined cycles with post-combustion CO2 capture and storage

IF 5.2 3区 工程技术 Q2 ENERGY & FUELS International Journal of Greenhouse Gas Control Pub Date : 2025-03-26 DOI:10.1016/j.ijggc.2025.104345
Andrea Zelaschi, Davide Bonalumi, Paolo Chiesa, Emanuele Martelli
{"title":"The advantages of reheated and intercooled gas turbines for combined cycles with post-combustion CO2 capture and storage","authors":"Andrea Zelaschi,&nbsp;Davide Bonalumi,&nbsp;Paolo Chiesa,&nbsp;Emanuele Martelli","doi":"10.1016/j.ijggc.2025.104345","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>This study investigates the efficiency and economic performance achievable by combined cycles with post-combustion CO<sub>2</sub> capture, employing different strategies to increase the concentration of CO<sub>2</sub> in the flue gases. These expedients include reheating in the gas turbine expansion, intercooling of the compression, and supplementary firing at the inlet of the heat recovery steam generator. The power block is modelled by using GS, a software developed at Politecnico di Milano, and the models are calibrated against data from commercial gas turbines. The amine-based CO<sub>2</sub> capture and compression system are simulated with a validated model implemented in Aspen Plus software. The analysis shows that, compared to the standard H-class combined cycle, reheating and intercooling slightly improve the efficiency with and without CO<sub>2</sub> capture (rising from 63% to 63.6-64.4% without capture and from 55.5% to 56.1-57.1% with CO<sub>2</sub> capture). A further important advantage of reheating and intercooling is the significant (up to 10%) decrease in the plants' specific investment cost ($/kW), especially for CO<sub>2</sub> capture plants. The best option for efficiency and costs involves a combination of intercooling and reheating, achieving a 4.5% reduction in the cost of electricity compared to the H-class standard cycle. The introduction of supplementary firing, in addition to reheating, further lowers the specific plant cost but negatively impacts efficiency and the cost of electricity.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":334,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Greenhouse Gas Control","volume":"144 ","pages":"Article 104345"},"PeriodicalIF":5.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Greenhouse Gas Control","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S175058362500043X","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENERGY & FUELS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This study investigates the efficiency and economic performance achievable by combined cycles with post-combustion CO2 capture, employing different strategies to increase the concentration of CO2 in the flue gases. These expedients include reheating in the gas turbine expansion, intercooling of the compression, and supplementary firing at the inlet of the heat recovery steam generator. The power block is modelled by using GS, a software developed at Politecnico di Milano, and the models are calibrated against data from commercial gas turbines. The amine-based CO2 capture and compression system are simulated with a validated model implemented in Aspen Plus software. The analysis shows that, compared to the standard H-class combined cycle, reheating and intercooling slightly improve the efficiency with and without CO2 capture (rising from 63% to 63.6-64.4% without capture and from 55.5% to 56.1-57.1% with CO2 capture). A further important advantage of reheating and intercooling is the significant (up to 10%) decrease in the plants' specific investment cost ($/kW), especially for CO2 capture plants. The best option for efficiency and costs involves a combination of intercooling and reheating, achieving a 4.5% reduction in the cost of electricity compared to the H-class standard cycle. The introduction of supplementary firing, in addition to reheating, further lowers the specific plant cost but negatively impacts efficiency and the cost of electricity.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
再加热和中冷燃气轮机与燃烧后二氧化碳捕获和储存联合循环的优势
本研究探讨了采用不同策略提高烟气中二氧化碳浓度的联合循环与燃烧后二氧化碳捕集所能达到的效率和经济效益。这些权宜之计包括燃气轮机膨胀的再加热,压缩的中间冷却,以及在热回收蒸汽发生器的入口补充燃烧。动力模块由米兰理工大学开发的软件GS建模,这些模型是根据商业燃气轮机的数据进行校准的。在Aspen Plus软件中实现了一个经过验证的模型,对基于胺的二氧化碳捕获和压缩系统进行了模拟。分析表明,与标准h级联合循环相比,再加热和中冷在进行CO2捕集和不进行CO2捕集时的效率略有提高(不进行CO2捕集的效率从63%提高到63.6-64.4%,有CO2捕集的效率从55.5%提高到56.1-57.1%)。再加热和中间冷却的另一个重要优势是显著(高达10%)降低电厂的特定投资成本($/kW),特别是对二氧化碳捕集厂。效率和成本的最佳选择包括中间冷却和再加热的组合,与h级标准循环相比,可实现4.5%的电力成本降低。除了再加热之外,补充燃烧的引入进一步降低了特定工厂的成本,但对效率和电力成本产生了负面影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
9.20
自引率
10.30%
发文量
199
审稿时长
4.8 months
期刊介绍: The International Journal of Greenhouse Gas Control is a peer reviewed journal focusing on scientific and engineering developments in greenhouse gas control through capture and storage at large stationary emitters in the power sector and in other major resource, manufacturing and production industries. The Journal covers all greenhouse gas emissions within the power and industrial sectors, and comprises both technical and non-technical related literature in one volume. Original research, review and comments papers are included.
期刊最新文献
Optimization of carbon capture, utilization, and storage supply chains for the hard-to-abate industry in Türkiye Influence of thermodynamic conditions on techno-economics of megaton-scale carbon sequestration via carbon dioxide hydrates Can acceptance of location-specific carbon capture and storage be tipped? The causal effects of information and question framing CESAR1 solvent degradation in pilot and laboratory scale Editorial Board
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1