Balancing Risk and Resilience: Which Plant Traits Should Inform Managed Relocation Species Selection?

IF 12 1区 环境科学与生态学 Q1 BIODIVERSITY CONSERVATION Global Change Biology Pub Date : 2025-03-26 DOI:10.1111/gcb.70145
Thomas W. M. Nuhfer, Bethany A. Bradley
{"title":"Balancing Risk and Resilience: Which Plant Traits Should Inform Managed Relocation Species Selection?","authors":"Thomas W. M. Nuhfer,&nbsp;Bethany A. Bradley","doi":"10.1111/gcb.70145","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n <p>Managed relocation is a critical tool for promoting ecological resilience in the face of climate change, and the approach has been proposed for the ecological restoration of plant communities. Given that the relocation of species poses some risk to the recipient ecosystem, plant traits associated with invasiveness have been proposed as a means for assessing risk and selecting candidate species for managed relocation. However, traits associated with invasiveness could also be relevant to successful restoration (and, in turn, for successful managed relocation)—particularly those linked to the establishment of viable populations. Here, we review studies in invasion and restoration ecology that have paired plant functional, ecological, and biogeographic traits with stages of invasion or successful restoration to ask which traits should be used to inform managed relocation species selection. We find substantial overlap between invasiveness traits and restoration traits during population establishment, but divergence during spread and impacts, suggesting that managed relocation species selection should only focus on traits that promote long-distance spread and impact. Instead, the few existing protocols for managed relocation species selection utilize traits that promote establishment. Given that the risk of unintended harm from managed relocation is orders of magnitude smaller than from non-native plant introduction, focusing on traits that promote establishment in risk assessments is likely to exclude those species most able to establish viable populations, causing failure rates in managed relocation. Instead, we recommend that risk assessments for managed relocation candidates focus on traits linked to invasive species spread or impacts and which are not necessary for restoration. Given the substantial ecological threats posed by climate change, a balanced approach to risk assessment that does not severely limit candidate species will best support successful managed relocation as a climate adaptation strategy.</p>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":175,"journal":{"name":"Global Change Biology","volume":"31 3","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":12.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Global Change Biology","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/gcb.70145","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BIODIVERSITY CONSERVATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Managed relocation is a critical tool for promoting ecological resilience in the face of climate change, and the approach has been proposed for the ecological restoration of plant communities. Given that the relocation of species poses some risk to the recipient ecosystem, plant traits associated with invasiveness have been proposed as a means for assessing risk and selecting candidate species for managed relocation. However, traits associated with invasiveness could also be relevant to successful restoration (and, in turn, for successful managed relocation)—particularly those linked to the establishment of viable populations. Here, we review studies in invasion and restoration ecology that have paired plant functional, ecological, and biogeographic traits with stages of invasion or successful restoration to ask which traits should be used to inform managed relocation species selection. We find substantial overlap between invasiveness traits and restoration traits during population establishment, but divergence during spread and impacts, suggesting that managed relocation species selection should only focus on traits that promote long-distance spread and impact. Instead, the few existing protocols for managed relocation species selection utilize traits that promote establishment. Given that the risk of unintended harm from managed relocation is orders of magnitude smaller than from non-native plant introduction, focusing on traits that promote establishment in risk assessments is likely to exclude those species most able to establish viable populations, causing failure rates in managed relocation. Instead, we recommend that risk assessments for managed relocation candidates focus on traits linked to invasive species spread or impacts and which are not necessary for restoration. Given the substantial ecological threats posed by climate change, a balanced approach to risk assessment that does not severely limit candidate species will best support successful managed relocation as a climate adaptation strategy.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
平衡风险和恢复力:哪些植物性状应该为管理迁移物种选择提供信息?
在气候变化的背景下,管理迁移是促进生态恢复的重要工具,也是植物群落生态恢复的重要途径。考虑到物种迁移会给接收地生态系统带来一定的风险,研究人员提出了与入侵性相关的植物性状作为评估风险和选择候选物种进行管理迁移的手段。然而,与入侵有关的特征也可能与成功的恢复有关(反过来,也与成功的管理迁移有关)——特别是与建立可生存种群有关的特征。在此,我们回顾了入侵和恢复生态学中关于植物功能、生态和生物地理特征与入侵或成功恢复阶段配对的研究,以探讨哪些特征应该用于管理迁移物种的选择。研究发现,在种群建立过程中,入侵性性状和恢复性性状存在显著的重叠,但在传播和影响过程中存在显著的差异,这表明有管理的迁移物种选择应只关注促进长距离传播和影响的性状。相反,现有的几种管理迁移物种选择协议利用了促进建立的性状。考虑到管理迁移造成意外伤害的风险比外来植物引入的风险小几个数量级,在风险评估中关注促进建立的性状可能会排除那些最有能力建立可行种群的物种,从而导致管理迁移的失败率。相反,我们建议对管理迁移候选者进行风险评估,重点关注与入侵物种传播或影响有关的特征,这些特征对恢复是不必要的。考虑到气候变化带来的巨大生态威胁,一种不严重限制候选物种的平衡的风险评估方法将最好地支持作为气候适应策略的成功管理迁移。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Global Change Biology
Global Change Biology 环境科学-环境科学
CiteScore
21.50
自引率
5.20%
发文量
497
审稿时长
3.3 months
期刊介绍: Global Change Biology is an environmental change journal committed to shaping the future and addressing the world's most pressing challenges, including sustainability, climate change, environmental protection, food and water safety, and global health. Dedicated to fostering a profound understanding of the impacts of global change on biological systems and offering innovative solutions, the journal publishes a diverse range of content, including primary research articles, technical advances, research reviews, reports, opinions, perspectives, commentaries, and letters. Starting with the 2024 volume, Global Change Biology will transition to an online-only format, enhancing accessibility and contributing to the evolution of scholarly communication.
期刊最新文献
Persistent Legacy Effects of Marine Heatwaves on Coral Symbioses Earthworms Enhance Global Soil Carbon Storage Through Microbial–Mineral Stabilization Deep Coring Shows That Mangrove Sediments in Matang (Malaysia) Store up to Five Times More Carbon Than Previously Estimated Biomass and Functional Traits of Plants and Soil Carbon‐to‐Nitrogen Ratio Jointly Control the Effect of Living Roots on Soil Carbon Decomposition Large Potential for CH 4 Mitigation and Yield Improvement in China's Paddies Through Locally Optimized N Management
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1