The equitable aging in health conceptual framework: international interventions infusing power and justice to address social isolation and loneliness among older adults.

IF 3.4 3区 医学 Q2 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH Frontiers in Public Health Pub Date : 2025-03-10 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.3389/fpubh.2025.1426015
Angela K Perone, Leixuri Urrutia-Pujana, Leyi Zhou, Mo'e Yaisikana, Barbara Mendez Campos
{"title":"The equitable aging in health conceptual framework: international interventions infusing power and justice to address social isolation and loneliness among older adults.","authors":"Angela K Perone, Leixuri Urrutia-Pujana, Leyi Zhou, Mo'e Yaisikana, Barbara Mendez Campos","doi":"10.3389/fpubh.2025.1426015","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Social isolation and loneliness among older adults have garnered significant international attention, particularly as structures and services have evolved during a global pandemic. A growing body of research underscores disparities in social isolation and loneliness among intersecting social (e.g., race, ethnicity, age, gender, sexual orientation, disability) and physical (e.g., rural/urban) locations. While empirical data about these global trends has increased, conceptual and theoretical frameworks are underdeveloped about disparities in social isolation and loneliness, especially from a global perspective. This article presents a novel equitable aging framework to help contextualize, understand, and explain how power influences disparities in social isolation and loneliness among older adults.</p><p><strong>Equitable aging in health conceptual framework: </strong>Equitable aging builds on principles in critical gerontology, public health concepts of social and political determinants of health, international human rights, and intersectionality frameworks to present a new conceptual framework for researchers, policymakers, and practitioners. Equitable aging centers five domains of power (intrapersonal, interpersonal, disciplinary, structural, and cultural) as critical components (or hub) that drive six political and social determinants of health (economic stability, education access and quality, health care access and quality, neighborhood and built environment, social and community context, and laws and politics). The sixth determinant of health (laws and policies) incorporates international human rights (economic, social, cultural, civil, political rights). When justice is infused in these domains of power, political and social determinants of health can produce equitable aging outcomes. The Equitable Aging in Health Framework presents a new tool that incorporates justice and power to help understand and explain disparities in social isolation and loneliness and ultimately how to achieve equitable opportunities for social connections for older adults.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>To illustrate the utility of this conceptual framework, this article presents six case studies of interventions in China, Taiwan, Spain, Sweden, Mexico, and the United States that employ this framework to address social isolation and loneliness among diverse communities of older adults. These interventions propose new services, programs, and policies that infuse different paradigms of justice and address domains of power in various ways to build social connections and support for older adults.</p>","PeriodicalId":12548,"journal":{"name":"Frontiers in Public Health","volume":"13 ","pages":"1426015"},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11930826/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Frontiers in Public Health","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3389/fpubh.2025.1426015","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Social isolation and loneliness among older adults have garnered significant international attention, particularly as structures and services have evolved during a global pandemic. A growing body of research underscores disparities in social isolation and loneliness among intersecting social (e.g., race, ethnicity, age, gender, sexual orientation, disability) and physical (e.g., rural/urban) locations. While empirical data about these global trends has increased, conceptual and theoretical frameworks are underdeveloped about disparities in social isolation and loneliness, especially from a global perspective. This article presents a novel equitable aging framework to help contextualize, understand, and explain how power influences disparities in social isolation and loneliness among older adults.

Equitable aging in health conceptual framework: Equitable aging builds on principles in critical gerontology, public health concepts of social and political determinants of health, international human rights, and intersectionality frameworks to present a new conceptual framework for researchers, policymakers, and practitioners. Equitable aging centers five domains of power (intrapersonal, interpersonal, disciplinary, structural, and cultural) as critical components (or hub) that drive six political and social determinants of health (economic stability, education access and quality, health care access and quality, neighborhood and built environment, social and community context, and laws and politics). The sixth determinant of health (laws and policies) incorporates international human rights (economic, social, cultural, civil, political rights). When justice is infused in these domains of power, political and social determinants of health can produce equitable aging outcomes. The Equitable Aging in Health Framework presents a new tool that incorporates justice and power to help understand and explain disparities in social isolation and loneliness and ultimately how to achieve equitable opportunities for social connections for older adults.

Discussion: To illustrate the utility of this conceptual framework, this article presents six case studies of interventions in China, Taiwan, Spain, Sweden, Mexico, and the United States that employ this framework to address social isolation and loneliness among diverse communities of older adults. These interventions propose new services, programs, and policies that infuse different paradigms of justice and address domains of power in various ways to build social connections and support for older adults.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
健康中的公平老龄化概念框架:为解决老年人的社会孤立和孤独问题注入权力和正义的国际干预措施。
导言:老年人的社会孤立和孤独引起了国际社会的极大关注,特别是在全球大流行期间结构和服务发生了变化。越来越多的研究强调,在交叉的社会(如种族、族裔、年龄、性别、性取向、残疾)和物理(如农村/城市)地点之间,社会孤立和孤独存在差异。虽然关于这些全球趋势的经验数据有所增加,但关于社会孤立和孤独差异的概念和理论框架尚不发达,特别是从全球角度来看。本文提出了一个新的公平老龄化框架,以帮助背景化、理解和解释权力如何影响老年人的社会孤立和孤独差异。健康概念框架中的公平老龄化:公平老龄化建立在关键老年学原则、健康的社会和政治决定因素的公共卫生概念、国际人权和交叉性框架的基础上,为研究人员、政策制定者和实践者提供了一个新的概念框架。公平老龄化将五个权力领域(人际关系、人际关系、学科、结构和文化)作为驱动健康的六个政治和社会决定因素(经济稳定、教育机会和质量、医疗机会和质量、邻里和建筑环境、社会和社区背景以及法律和政治)的关键组成部分(或枢纽)。健康的第六个决定因素(法律和政策)纳入了国际人权(经济、社会、文化、公民和政治权利)。当在这些权力领域注入正义时,健康的政治和社会决定因素就能产生公平的老龄化结果。健康中的公平老龄化框架提供了一种新的工具,它结合了正义和力量,有助于理解和解释社会孤立和孤独方面的差异,并最终为老年人实现社会联系的公平机会。讨论:为了说明这一概念框架的实用性,本文介绍了中国、台湾、西班牙、瑞典、墨西哥和美国的六个干预案例研究,这些干预研究采用这一框架来解决不同社区老年人的社会隔离和孤独问题。这些干预措施提出了新的服务、项目和政策,注入了不同的正义范式,并以各种方式处理权力领域,以建立社会联系和支持老年人。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Frontiers in Public Health
Frontiers in Public Health Medicine-Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health
CiteScore
4.80
自引率
7.70%
发文量
4469
审稿时长
14 weeks
期刊介绍: Frontiers in Public Health is a multidisciplinary open-access journal which publishes rigorously peer-reviewed research and is at the forefront of disseminating and communicating scientific knowledge and impactful discoveries to researchers, academics, clinicians, policy makers and the public worldwide. The journal aims at overcoming current fragmentation in research and publication, promoting consistency in pursuing relevant scientific themes, and supporting finding dissemination and translation into practice. Frontiers in Public Health is organized into Specialty Sections that cover different areas of research in the field. Please refer to the author guidelines for details on article types and the submission process.
期刊最新文献
A narrative review of pedagogical approaches and action pathways for climate change education in medical and health professions training. Attitudes of healthcare workers toward recommending vaccination against herpes zoster: a study based on the health belief model and theory of planned behavior. The effects of microplastics exposure on the growth and development of children. A PRECEDE-PROCEED-based educational program: enhancing self-care and quality of life with implications for biochemical outcomes in hemodialysis patients. Breaking barriers: unraveling the impact of cultural beliefs and misconceptions on HPV vaccination uptake-the narrative review.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1