Support Network Typology and Psychological Well-Being Among Young Adults.

IF 2.7 3区 医学 Q1 COMMUNICATION Health Communication Pub Date : 2025-11-01 Epub Date: 2025-03-25 DOI:10.1080/10410236.2025.2480684
Jiaqi Qin, Jingbo Meng
{"title":"Support Network Typology and Psychological Well-Being Among Young Adults.","authors":"Jiaqi Qin, Jingbo Meng","doi":"10.1080/10410236.2025.2480684","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The psychological well-being of young adults is a growing concern in the United States. Social networks, comprising relationships that provide various types of support, are crucial predictors of their psychological well-being. A network typology offers a pattern-centered approach to classify relational compositions into subgroups with similar patterns. Using longitudinal data from the UC Berkeley Social Networks Study (UCNets), this study identified a network typology for young adults' support networks and examined its relationship with psychological well-being across four functional support networks: confidant, advice-seeking, practical support, and companionship networks. Clustering analysis identified six support network types: family-focused, friends-focused, partner-friends, friends-family, partner-family, and peers-focused (friends and schoolmates) networks. Multilevel regression analyses indicated that family-focused networks were the most beneficial confidant and companionship network type for improving young adults' psychological well-being. In addition, relying on peers-focused networks for advice-seeking and practical support was associated with lower psychological well-being compared to family-focused networks. The findings provide important practical implications for developing health interventions.</p>","PeriodicalId":12889,"journal":{"name":"Health Communication","volume":" ","pages":"2745-2757"},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Health Communication","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/10410236.2025.2480684","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/3/25 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"COMMUNICATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The psychological well-being of young adults is a growing concern in the United States. Social networks, comprising relationships that provide various types of support, are crucial predictors of their psychological well-being. A network typology offers a pattern-centered approach to classify relational compositions into subgroups with similar patterns. Using longitudinal data from the UC Berkeley Social Networks Study (UCNets), this study identified a network typology for young adults' support networks and examined its relationship with psychological well-being across four functional support networks: confidant, advice-seeking, practical support, and companionship networks. Clustering analysis identified six support network types: family-focused, friends-focused, partner-friends, friends-family, partner-family, and peers-focused (friends and schoolmates) networks. Multilevel regression analyses indicated that family-focused networks were the most beneficial confidant and companionship network type for improving young adults' psychological well-being. In addition, relying on peers-focused networks for advice-seeking and practical support was associated with lower psychological well-being compared to family-focused networks. The findings provide important practical implications for developing health interventions.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
青少年的支持网络类型与心理健康。
在美国,年轻人的心理健康问题日益受到关注。社会网络由提供各种支持的关系组成,是预测青少年心理健康的关键因素。网络类型学提供了一种以模式为中心的方法,将关系构成划分为具有相似模式的子群。本研究利用加州大学伯克利分校社会网络研究(UCNets)的纵向数据,确定了青壮年支持网络的网络类型学,并研究了其与四种功能性支持网络(知己网络、寻求建议网络、实际支持网络和陪伴网络)中心理健康的关系。聚类分析确定了六种支持网络类型:以家庭为中心的网络、以朋友为中心的网络、以伴侣为中心的网络、以朋友为中心的网络、以伴侣为中心的网络和以同伴(朋友和同学)为中心的网络。多层次回归分析表明,以家庭为中心的网络是最有利于改善青少年心理健康的知己和伴侣网络类型。此外,与以家庭为中心的网络相比,依赖以同伴为中心的网络寻求建议和实际支持与较低的心理幸福感有关。研究结果为制定健康干预措施提供了重要的现实意义。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
8.20
自引率
10.30%
发文量
184
期刊介绍: As an outlet for scholarly intercourse between medical and social sciences, this noteworthy journal seeks to improve practical communication between caregivers and patients and between institutions and the public. Outstanding editorial board members and contributors from both medical and social science arenas collaborate to meet the challenges inherent in this goal. Although most inclusions are data-based, the journal also publishes pedagogical, methodological, theoretical, and applied articles using both quantitative or qualitative methods.
期刊最新文献
Dedicated Workspace for Co-Located Healthcare Professionals: Affordances for Interprofessional Communication in Hospitals. Who Trusts AI for Health Information? A Cross-National Survey on Trust Determinants in Four European Countries. Value Added: Vicarious-Affirmation Strategies to Enhance Prediabetes Awareness Among High-Risk Hispanics. The Representation of Help Givers in First Aid Instruction Materials: A Multimodal Reception Study. Self-Disclosure of Mental Health via Deepfakes: Testing the Effects of Self-Deepfakes on Affective Resistance and Intention to Seek Mental Health Support.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1