Active Learning Based on Temporal Difference of Gradient Flow in Thoracic Disease Diagnosis.

IF 6.8 2区 医学 Q1 COMPUTER SCIENCE, INFORMATION SYSTEMS IEEE Journal of Biomedical and Health Informatics Pub Date : 2025-08-01 DOI:10.1109/JBHI.2025.3554298
Jiayi Chen, Benteng Ma, Hengfei Cui, Jingfeng Zhang, Yong Xia
{"title":"Active Learning Based on Temporal Difference of Gradient Flow in Thoracic Disease Diagnosis.","authors":"Jiayi Chen, Benteng Ma, Hengfei Cui, Jingfeng Zhang, Yong Xia","doi":"10.1109/JBHI.2025.3554298","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Given the significant advancements in thoracic disease diagnosis due to deep learning, there is a reliance on the availability of numerous annotated samples, which, however, can hardly be guaranteed due to the resource-intensive nature of medical image annotation. Active learning has been introduced to mitigate annotation costs by selecting a subset of uncertain samples for annotation and training. Existing active learning methods encounter two primary challenges: 1) overlooking the impact of samples on the dynamics of model training during data selection, and 2) suffering from high costs of data evaluation and selection. To tackle both issues, we propose a novel metric called Temporal Difference of Gradient Flow (TDGF) for data selection in active learning. Each round of active learning involves three steps: model training, data selection, and data annotation. First, we train a target model, a proxy model, and a historical proxy model on the labeled set. Second, the TDGF scores of unlabeled samples are evaluated based on the surrogate gradient flow, i.e., the TDGF w.r.t the final fully-connected layer between the proxy and historical proxy models, and top-K samples with the highest TDGF scores are selected. Third, the selected samples are annotated, and the labeled pool and unlabeled pool are updated. Comparative experiments have been conducted on two public chest radiograph datasets, i.e., ChestX-ray14 and CheXpert. Our results suggest that the proposed TDGF metric is prone to selecting hard and uncertain samples, and the use of proxy models and surrogate gradient flow substantially reduces the complexity of TDGF calculation. More importantly, the results also indicate that our TDGF-based method outperforms classical and state-of-the-art active learning methods in thoracic disease diagnosis.</p>","PeriodicalId":13073,"journal":{"name":"IEEE Journal of Biomedical and Health Informatics","volume":"PP ","pages":"5887-5899"},"PeriodicalIF":6.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"IEEE Journal of Biomedical and Health Informatics","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/JBHI.2025.3554298","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"COMPUTER SCIENCE, INFORMATION SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Given the significant advancements in thoracic disease diagnosis due to deep learning, there is a reliance on the availability of numerous annotated samples, which, however, can hardly be guaranteed due to the resource-intensive nature of medical image annotation. Active learning has been introduced to mitigate annotation costs by selecting a subset of uncertain samples for annotation and training. Existing active learning methods encounter two primary challenges: 1) overlooking the impact of samples on the dynamics of model training during data selection, and 2) suffering from high costs of data evaluation and selection. To tackle both issues, we propose a novel metric called Temporal Difference of Gradient Flow (TDGF) for data selection in active learning. Each round of active learning involves three steps: model training, data selection, and data annotation. First, we train a target model, a proxy model, and a historical proxy model on the labeled set. Second, the TDGF scores of unlabeled samples are evaluated based on the surrogate gradient flow, i.e., the TDGF w.r.t the final fully-connected layer between the proxy and historical proxy models, and top-K samples with the highest TDGF scores are selected. Third, the selected samples are annotated, and the labeled pool and unlabeled pool are updated. Comparative experiments have been conducted on two public chest radiograph datasets, i.e., ChestX-ray14 and CheXpert. Our results suggest that the proposed TDGF metric is prone to selecting hard and uncertain samples, and the use of proxy models and surrogate gradient flow substantially reduces the complexity of TDGF calculation. More importantly, the results also indicate that our TDGF-based method outperforms classical and state-of-the-art active learning methods in thoracic disease diagnosis.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
基于梯度流时间差的主动学习在胸部疾病诊断中的应用。
由于深度学习在胸部疾病诊断方面取得了重大进展,因此依赖于大量注释样本的可用性,然而,由于医学图像注释的资源密集型性质,这很难得到保证。主动学习通过选择不确定样本子集进行标注和训练来降低标注成本。现有的主动学习方法面临两个主要挑战:(1)在数据选择过程中忽略了样本对模型训练动态的影响;(2)数据评估和选择的成本高。为了解决这两个问题,我们提出了一种新的度量,称为梯度流的时间差(TDGF),用于主动学习中的数据选择。每一轮主动学习包括三个步骤:模型训练、数据选择和数据注释。首先,我们在标记集上训练目标模型、代理模型和历史代理模型。其次,基于代理梯度流评估未标记样本的TDGF分数,即代理模型与历史代理模型之间的最终完全连接层的TDGF w.r.t,并选择TDGF分数最高的top-K样本。第三,对选中的样本进行标注,更新标记池和未标记池。在两个公共胸片数据集(即ChestX-ray14和CheXpert)上进行了对比实验。我们的研究结果表明,所提出的TDGF度量容易选择硬样本和不确定样本,使用代理模型和代理梯度流大大降低了TDGF计算的复杂性。更重要的是,结果还表明,我们基于tdgf的方法在胸部疾病诊断中优于经典和最先进的主动学习方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
IEEE Journal of Biomedical and Health Informatics
IEEE Journal of Biomedical and Health Informatics COMPUTER SCIENCE, INFORMATION SYSTEMS-COMPUTER SCIENCE, INTERDISCIPLINARY APPLICATIONS
CiteScore
13.60
自引率
6.50%
发文量
1151
期刊介绍: IEEE Journal of Biomedical and Health Informatics publishes original papers presenting recent advances where information and communication technologies intersect with health, healthcare, life sciences, and biomedicine. Topics include acquisition, transmission, storage, retrieval, management, and analysis of biomedical and health information. The journal covers applications of information technologies in healthcare, patient monitoring, preventive care, early disease diagnosis, therapy discovery, and personalized treatment protocols. It explores electronic medical and health records, clinical information systems, decision support systems, medical and biological imaging informatics, wearable systems, body area/sensor networks, and more. Integration-related topics like interoperability, evidence-based medicine, and secure patient data are also addressed.
期刊最新文献
HSD: Hough-Based Structure-Aware Detection of B-Lines in Lung Ultrasound. DDRL:Dyna-Based Discriminative Reinforcement Learning for Optimizing Sepsis Treatment Pathways in Offline Environments. Consensus and Complementary Feature Guided Multi-modal Knowledge Distillation Network for Breast Cancer Diagnosis. Structure-Constrained Regression Network for Efficient and Topology-Guaranteed Retinal Layer Segmentation in OCT Images. BLADE: Breast Lesion Analysis with Domain Expertise for DCE-MRI Diagnosis.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1