Oral Health Effects Among Adults Switching from Cigarettes to on!® Nicotine Pouches Compared to Those Who Continue Smoking.

IF 1.4 4区 医学 Q3 DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE Oral health & preventive dentistry Pub Date : 2025-03-25 DOI:10.3290/j.ohpd.c_1925
Jianmin Liu, Jeffery S Edmiston, Jingzhu Wang, Kimberly R Milleman, Jeffery L Milleman, Abigale L Yoder, Maria Gogova, Mohamadi A Sarkar
{"title":"Oral Health Effects Among Adults Switching from Cigarettes to on!® Nicotine Pouches Compared to Those Who Continue Smoking.","authors":"Jianmin Liu, Jeffery S Edmiston, Jingzhu Wang, Kimberly R Milleman, Jeffery L Milleman, Abigale L Yoder, Maria Gogova, Mohamadi A Sarkar","doi":"10.3290/j.ohpd.c_1925","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>The oral-health impact of nicotine pouches, an emerging category of oral tobacco products, has not been well studied. We evaluated the effects of switching from cigarettes to on!® nicotine pouches (test product, TPs) on oral-health endpoints among adult smokers (AS) relative to those who just continued smoking (CS).</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>In this randomised, open-label, parallel-group study, participants were randomly assigned to ad libitum use of 2, 4, or 8 mg nicotine TP or CS for 24 weeks. Oral-health endpoints, e.g., Modified Gingival Index (MGI), Gingival Bleeding Index (BI), and Lobene Stain Index (LSI)] were assessed at baseline and weeks 12 and 24, and compared between the TP and CS groups by using linear mixed model analysis for repeated measurements.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>n = 155 participants were randomised; 100 (TP = 48; CS = 52) completed week 12, and 85 (TP = 40; CS = 45) completed week 24 assessments. The TP group reduced their cigarette consumption by >90% by weeks 12 and 24 despite not intending to quit at baseline. Statistically significant reductions (p < 0.001) were observed for MGI and BI at weeks 12 (MGI = 20%; BI = 30%) and 24 (MGI = 28%; BI = 23%) in the TP group compared to the CS group, as well as compared to baseline. Statistically significant reductions (~60%, p < 0.001) were also observed for LSI in TP vs CS. No statistically significant changes were observed for LSI in the CS group at weeks 12 and 24 compared to baseline.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>The findings from this study suggest that TPs do not negatively impact users' oral health over 24 weeks of use. The reduction in oral health endpoints supports the harm reduction potential of TPs.</p>","PeriodicalId":19696,"journal":{"name":"Oral health & preventive dentistry","volume":"23 ","pages":"189-201"},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11966149/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Oral health & preventive dentistry","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3290/j.ohpd.c_1925","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: The oral-health impact of nicotine pouches, an emerging category of oral tobacco products, has not been well studied. We evaluated the effects of switching from cigarettes to on!® nicotine pouches (test product, TPs) on oral-health endpoints among adult smokers (AS) relative to those who just continued smoking (CS).

Materials and methods: In this randomised, open-label, parallel-group study, participants were randomly assigned to ad libitum use of 2, 4, or 8 mg nicotine TP or CS for 24 weeks. Oral-health endpoints, e.g., Modified Gingival Index (MGI), Gingival Bleeding Index (BI), and Lobene Stain Index (LSI)] were assessed at baseline and weeks 12 and 24, and compared between the TP and CS groups by using linear mixed model analysis for repeated measurements.

Results: n = 155 participants were randomised; 100 (TP = 48; CS = 52) completed week 12, and 85 (TP = 40; CS = 45) completed week 24 assessments. The TP group reduced their cigarette consumption by >90% by weeks 12 and 24 despite not intending to quit at baseline. Statistically significant reductions (p < 0.001) were observed for MGI and BI at weeks 12 (MGI = 20%; BI = 30%) and 24 (MGI = 28%; BI = 23%) in the TP group compared to the CS group, as well as compared to baseline. Statistically significant reductions (~60%, p < 0.001) were also observed for LSI in TP vs CS. No statistically significant changes were observed for LSI in the CS group at weeks 12 and 24 compared to baseline.

Discussion: The findings from this study suggest that TPs do not negatively impact users' oral health over 24 weeks of use. The reduction in oral health endpoints supports the harm reduction potential of TPs.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
戒烟对成年人口腔健康的影响!®尼古丁袋与继续吸烟的人的比较。
目的:尼古丁袋是一种新兴的口服烟草制品,但其对口腔健康的影响尚未得到充分研究。我们评估了成年吸烟者(AS)与继续吸烟者(CS)相比,从香烟改用on!®尼古丁袋(测试产品,TPs)对口腔健康终点的影响:在这项随机、开放标签、平行分组的研究中,参与者被随机分配到随意使用2、4或8毫克尼古丁TP或CS,为期24周。在基线、第 12 周和第 24 周评估口腔健康终点,如改良牙龈指数 (MGI)、牙龈出血指数 (BI) 和 Lobene 染色指数 (LSI)],并采用线性混合模型分析法对 TP 组和 CS 组进行重复测量比较。结果:n = 155 名参与者被随机分配;100 人(TP = 48 人;CS = 52 人)完成了第 12 周评估,85 人(TP = 40 人;CS = 45 人)完成了第 24 周评估。在第 12 周和第 24 周,TP 组的吸烟量减少了 90% 以上,尽管他们在基线时并不打算戒烟。在第 12 周(MGI = 20%;BI = 30%)和第 24 周(MGI = 28%;BI = 23%),TP 组的 MGI 和 BI 与 CS 组相比,以及与基线相比,均出现了统计学意义上的明显降低(p < 0.001)。与 CS 组相比,TP 组的 LSI 也出现了统计学意义上的明显降低(约 60%,P < 0.001)。在第 12 周和第 24 周,CS 组的 LSI 与基线相比没有观察到明显的统计学变化:讨论:这项研究的结果表明,使用 24 周的热塑性硫化弹性体不会对使用者的口腔健康产生负面影响。口腔健康终点的降低支持了最终产品减少危害的潜力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Oral health & preventive dentistry
Oral health & preventive dentistry DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE-
CiteScore
3.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
51
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Clinicians, general practitioners, teachers, researchers, and public health administrators will find this journal an indispensable source of essential, timely information about scientific progress in the fields of oral health and the prevention of caries, periodontal diseases, oral mucosal diseases, and dental trauma. Central topics, including oral hygiene, oral epidemiology, oral health promotion, and public health issues, are covered in peer-reviewed articles such as clinical and basic science research reports; reviews; invited focus articles, commentaries, and guest editorials; and symposium, workshop, and conference proceedings.
期刊最新文献
Diagnosis to Follow-Up: Practice Variability and Evidence-Based Gaps In Vital Pulp Therapy Among Saudi Dentists. A Cross-Sectional Survey of Dentists on Antibiotic Prescribing and Allergy Management in Oral Surgery. Prevalence and Associated Factors of Halitosis Among University Students in Guangxi, Southern China: A Cross-Sectional Study. Frequency of Oral Squamous Cell Carcinoma in Two Public Hospitals in Peru: A Ten-Year Retrospective Study. Awareness of Amalgam and Safe Removal Techniques Among Dentists in Turkey: A Cross-Sectional Study.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1