LI-RADS for Diagnosing Hepatocellular Carcinoma in Patients with Noncirrhotic Chronic Hepatitis C.

IF 15.2 1区 医学 Q1 RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING Radiology Pub Date : 2025-03-01 DOI:10.1148/radiol.241856
Jihyun An, Rohee Park, Euichang Kim, Seong Kyun Na, Ha Il Kim, In-Hye Song, Young Seo Cho, Ji Hun Kang, Han Chu Lee, Seungbong Han, Jean-Charles Nault, Sang Hyun Choi, Ju Hyun Shim
{"title":"LI-RADS for Diagnosing Hepatocellular Carcinoma in Patients with Noncirrhotic Chronic Hepatitis C.","authors":"Jihyun An, Rohee Park, Euichang Kim, Seong Kyun Na, Ha Il Kim, In-Hye Song, Young Seo Cho, Ji Hun Kang, Han Chu Lee, Seungbong Han, Jean-Charles Nault, Sang Hyun Choi, Ju Hyun Shim","doi":"10.1148/radiol.241856","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Background The Liver Imaging Reporting and Data System (LI-RADS) criteria have not been validated for patients with noncirrhotic chronic hepatitis C (CHC), who are at a greater risk for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) than the general population. Purpose To evaluate the diagnostic performance of LI-RADS category 5 (LR-5, indicating definite HCC) observations for HCC using CT and MRI in patients with noncirrhotic CHC and to compare these findings with those in patients with cirrhotic CHC. Materials and Methods This retrospective study included patients without cirrhosis with CHC with focal hepatic nodules of 1 cm or greater on dynamic CT or MRI scans who underwent pathologic confirmation at two university hospitals from August 2002 to February 2022. This group served as the test dataset. The primary outcome was the diagnostic performance of LR-5 for HCC using CT and MRI. When LI-RADS categorization differed between CT and MRI, the MRI-based classification was used as the definitive category. Results were validated using a dataset of patients with CHC from two additional hospitals based on the clinical composite reference standard. Sensitivity, specificity, and area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) were calculated. Results The test dataset comprised 458 patients (mean age, 64 years ± 9 [SD]; 350 male; 219 without cirrhosis, 239 with cirrhosis). For noncirrhotic livers, the LR-5 criteria achieved an AUC, accuracy, sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), and negative predictive value (NPV) of 0.90 (95% CI: 0.86, 0.93), 85.1% (95% CI: 80.6, 89.7), 82.4% (95% CI: 77.0, 87.8), 97.6% (95% CI: 93.0, 100.0), 99.4% (95% CI: 98.2, 100.0), and 54.7% (95% CI: 43.4, 65.9), respectively. The AUC for LR-5 observations in diagnosing HCC was higher in the noncirrhotic liver group compared with the cirrhotic liver group (AUC, 0.90 [95% CI: 0.86, 0.93] vs 0.79 [95% CI: 0.74, 0.84]; <i>P</i> = .002). The diagnostic performance of the LR-5 criteria for diagnosing HCC was also excellent in patients with noncirrhotic CHC in the validation dataset, which included 155 lesions from 103 patients (mean age, 68 years ± 12; 146 male). The AUC, accuracy, sensitivity, specificity, PPV, and NPV in the validation dataset were 0.91 (95% CI: 0.84, 0.97), 96.1% (95% CI: 93.1, 99.2), 82.9% (95% CI: 70.4, 95.3), 100%, 100%, and 95.2% (95% CI: 91.5, 99.0), respectively. Conclusion The diagnostic performance of LR-5 for HCC in patients with noncirrhotic CHC was comparable to that in patients with cirrhosis across various clinical settings. © RSNA, 2025 <i>Supplemental material is available for this article.</i> See also the editorial by Schöllnast in this issue.</p>","PeriodicalId":20896,"journal":{"name":"Radiology","volume":"314 3","pages":"e241856"},"PeriodicalIF":15.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Radiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1148/radiol.241856","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background The Liver Imaging Reporting and Data System (LI-RADS) criteria have not been validated for patients with noncirrhotic chronic hepatitis C (CHC), who are at a greater risk for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) than the general population. Purpose To evaluate the diagnostic performance of LI-RADS category 5 (LR-5, indicating definite HCC) observations for HCC using CT and MRI in patients with noncirrhotic CHC and to compare these findings with those in patients with cirrhotic CHC. Materials and Methods This retrospective study included patients without cirrhosis with CHC with focal hepatic nodules of 1 cm or greater on dynamic CT or MRI scans who underwent pathologic confirmation at two university hospitals from August 2002 to February 2022. This group served as the test dataset. The primary outcome was the diagnostic performance of LR-5 for HCC using CT and MRI. When LI-RADS categorization differed between CT and MRI, the MRI-based classification was used as the definitive category. Results were validated using a dataset of patients with CHC from two additional hospitals based on the clinical composite reference standard. Sensitivity, specificity, and area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) were calculated. Results The test dataset comprised 458 patients (mean age, 64 years ± 9 [SD]; 350 male; 219 without cirrhosis, 239 with cirrhosis). For noncirrhotic livers, the LR-5 criteria achieved an AUC, accuracy, sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), and negative predictive value (NPV) of 0.90 (95% CI: 0.86, 0.93), 85.1% (95% CI: 80.6, 89.7), 82.4% (95% CI: 77.0, 87.8), 97.6% (95% CI: 93.0, 100.0), 99.4% (95% CI: 98.2, 100.0), and 54.7% (95% CI: 43.4, 65.9), respectively. The AUC for LR-5 observations in diagnosing HCC was higher in the noncirrhotic liver group compared with the cirrhotic liver group (AUC, 0.90 [95% CI: 0.86, 0.93] vs 0.79 [95% CI: 0.74, 0.84]; P = .002). The diagnostic performance of the LR-5 criteria for diagnosing HCC was also excellent in patients with noncirrhotic CHC in the validation dataset, which included 155 lesions from 103 patients (mean age, 68 years ± 12; 146 male). The AUC, accuracy, sensitivity, specificity, PPV, and NPV in the validation dataset were 0.91 (95% CI: 0.84, 0.97), 96.1% (95% CI: 93.1, 99.2), 82.9% (95% CI: 70.4, 95.3), 100%, 100%, and 95.2% (95% CI: 91.5, 99.0), respectively. Conclusion The diagnostic performance of LR-5 for HCC in patients with noncirrhotic CHC was comparable to that in patients with cirrhosis across various clinical settings. © RSNA, 2025 Supplemental material is available for this article. See also the editorial by Schöllnast in this issue.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
LI-RADS用于诊断非肝硬化慢性丙型肝炎患者的肝细胞癌。
肝成像报告和数据系统(LI-RADS)标准尚未在非肝硬化慢性丙型肝炎(CHC)患者中得到验证,这些患者发生肝细胞癌(HCC)的风险高于普通人群。目的评价LI-RADS第5类(LR-5,明确HCC) CT和MRI对非肝硬化CHC患者HCC的诊断效果,并将这些结果与肝硬化CHC患者的结果进行比较。材料和方法本回顾性研究纳入了2002年8月至2022年2月在两所大学医院接受病理证实的无肝硬化CHC伴局灶性肝结节1cm或更大动态CT或MRI扫描的患者。这一组作为测试数据集。主要结果为CT和MRI对HCC的LR-5诊断表现。当CT和MRI的LI-RADS分类不同时,以MRI为基础的分类作为最终分类。基于临床综合参考标准,使用另外两家医院的CHC患者数据集验证了结果。计算灵敏度、特异性和受试者工作特征曲线下面积(AUC)。结果试验数据集包括458例患者(平均年龄64岁±9岁[SD];350名男性;无肝硬化219例,肝硬化239例)。对于非肝硬化肝脏,LR-5标准的AUC、准确性、敏感性、特异性、阳性预测值(PPV)和阴性预测值(NPV)分别为0.90 (95% CI: 0.86、0.93)、85.1% (95% CI: 80.6、89.7)、82.4% (95% CI: 77.0、87.8)、97.6% (95% CI: 93.0、100.0)、99.4% (95% CI: 98.2、100.0)和54.7% (95% CI: 43.4、65.9)。与肝硬化组相比,非肝硬化组LR-5观察诊断HCC的AUC更高(AUC, 0.90 [95% CI: 0.86, 0.93] vs 0.79 [95% CI: 0.74, 0.84];P = .002)。在验证数据集中,用于诊断HCC的LR-5标准在非肝硬化CHC患者中的诊断性能也很好,该数据包括103例患者的155个病变(平均年龄,68岁±12岁;146名男性)。验证数据集的AUC、准确度、灵敏度、特异性、PPV和NPV分别为0.91 (95% CI: 0.84、0.97)、96.1% (95% CI: 93.1、99.2)、82.9% (95% CI: 70.4、95.3)、100%、100%和95.2% (95% CI: 91.5、99.0)。结论在不同的临床环境下,LR-5对非肝硬化CHC患者HCC的诊断效果与肝硬化患者相当。©RSNA, 2025本文可获得补充材料。参见Schöllnast在本期的社论。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Radiology
Radiology 医学-核医学
CiteScore
35.20
自引率
3.00%
发文量
596
审稿时长
3.6 months
期刊介绍: Published regularly since 1923 by the Radiological Society of North America (RSNA), Radiology has long been recognized as the authoritative reference for the most current, clinically relevant and highest quality research in the field of radiology. Each month the journal publishes approximately 240 pages of peer-reviewed original research, authoritative reviews, well-balanced commentary on significant articles, and expert opinion on new techniques and technologies. Radiology publishes cutting edge and impactful imaging research articles in radiology and medical imaging in order to help improve human health.
期刊最新文献
Potassium MRI at 7 T: Opening a Window into Intracellular Electrolyte Balance. Contrast-Enhanced US Using Perfluorobutane for Diagnosing Small HCC in High-Risk Patients: Comparison with MRI LI-RADS Version 2018. MRI for Active Surveillance in Prostate Cancer: How I Do It. ELCAP Coronary Artery Calcium Score and Long-Term Mortality Prediction. Ablation and Surgery Show Comparable Long-term Outcomes for T1a Renal Cell Carcinoma: A Danish Nationwide Registry Study.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1