Effects of home-sourced sensory disturbances on the work from home experience: A work-home boundary perspective.

IF 1.5 4区 医学 Q3 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH Work-A Journal of Prevention Assessment & Rehabilitation Pub Date : 2025-07-01 Epub Date: 2025-03-24 DOI:10.1177/10519815251319211
Jennifer Erickson, Ruth Kanfer
{"title":"Effects of home-sourced sensory disturbances on the work from home experience: A work-home boundary perspective.","authors":"Jennifer Erickson, Ruth Kanfer","doi":"10.1177/10519815251319211","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The modern work from home (WFH) arrangement presents a unique paradox, offering workers the freedom to customize their workspace while simultaneously exposing them to potential negative effects from the blending of home and work domains, particularly through sensory disturbances from nonwork sources.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>We examine the relationships between spatial variables within home workspaces (home workspace size, location, and depth) and employees' self-reported sensory (visual, auditory, olfactory) experiences from the home domain. We explore how these sensory experiences relate to two key negative worker outcomes and consider how these outcomes may relate to an individual's future intention to work from home. Additionally, we integrate boundary theory to explain the interplay between home and work domains.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>199 administrative staff workers were recruited through email solicitations to participate in an online survey. After giving informed consent, participants provided demographic, workspace-related, and attitudinal data. Data was gathered between August and September 2022.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Results show that individuals working in their kitchen and open areas of the home reported more visual disturbances than individuals working in enclosed areas. Larger workplaces were also associated with fewer auditory disturbances. In turn, visual and auditory disturbances were associated with increased stress and home-to-work boundary violations, which had a negative relationship with future work-from-home intentions.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The findings highlight the importance of optimizing the spatial configuration of home workspaces to minimize the impact of sensory disturbances on stress and work-home boundaries, thereby supporting a more sustainable work-from-home experience.</p>","PeriodicalId":51373,"journal":{"name":"Work-A Journal of Prevention Assessment & Rehabilitation","volume":" ","pages":"3044-3059"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Work-A Journal of Prevention Assessment & Rehabilitation","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/10519815251319211","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/3/24 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: The modern work from home (WFH) arrangement presents a unique paradox, offering workers the freedom to customize their workspace while simultaneously exposing them to potential negative effects from the blending of home and work domains, particularly through sensory disturbances from nonwork sources.

Objective: We examine the relationships between spatial variables within home workspaces (home workspace size, location, and depth) and employees' self-reported sensory (visual, auditory, olfactory) experiences from the home domain. We explore how these sensory experiences relate to two key negative worker outcomes and consider how these outcomes may relate to an individual's future intention to work from home. Additionally, we integrate boundary theory to explain the interplay between home and work domains.

Methods: 199 administrative staff workers were recruited through email solicitations to participate in an online survey. After giving informed consent, participants provided demographic, workspace-related, and attitudinal data. Data was gathered between August and September 2022.

Results: Results show that individuals working in their kitchen and open areas of the home reported more visual disturbances than individuals working in enclosed areas. Larger workplaces were also associated with fewer auditory disturbances. In turn, visual and auditory disturbances were associated with increased stress and home-to-work boundary violations, which had a negative relationship with future work-from-home intentions.

Conclusions: The findings highlight the importance of optimizing the spatial configuration of home workspaces to minimize the impact of sensory disturbances on stress and work-home boundaries, thereby supporting a more sustainable work-from-home experience.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
来自家庭的感官障碍对来自家庭的工作体验的影响:工作-家庭边界的视角。
背景:现代在家工作(WFH)的安排呈现出一个独特的悖论,它为员工提供了定制工作空间的自由,同时也使他们暴露在家庭和工作领域混合的潜在负面影响之下,尤其是来自非工作来源的感官干扰。目的:研究家庭工作空间中的空间变量(家庭工作空间的大小、位置和深度)与员工自我报告的来自家庭领域的感官体验(视觉、听觉、嗅觉)之间的关系。我们探讨了这些感官体验与两个关键的消极工作结果之间的关系,并考虑了这些结果与个人未来在家工作的意向之间的关系。此外,我们整合边界理论来解释家庭和工作领域之间的相互作用。方法:采用电子邮件征集的方式,对199名行政管理人员进行在线调查。在给予知情同意后,参与者提供了人口统计、工作空间相关和态度数据。数据收集于2022年8月至9月。结果:结果表明,在厨房和家中开放区域工作的个体比在封闭区域工作的个体报告更多的视觉障碍。更大的工作场所也与更少的听觉障碍有关。反过来,视觉和听觉障碍与压力增加和家庭到工作的边界违反有关,这与未来在家工作的意图呈负相关。结论:研究结果强调了优化家庭办公空间配置的重要性,以最大限度地减少感官干扰对压力和工作-家庭界限的影响,从而支持更可持续的在家工作体验。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Work-A Journal of Prevention Assessment & Rehabilitation
Work-A Journal of Prevention Assessment & Rehabilitation PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH-
CiteScore
3.00
自引率
30.40%
发文量
739
期刊介绍: WORK: A Journal of Prevention, Assessment & Rehabilitation is an interdisciplinary, international journal which publishes high quality peer-reviewed manuscripts covering the entire scope of the occupation of work. The journal''s subtitle has been deliberately laid out: The first goal is the prevention of illness, injury, and disability. When this goal is not achievable, the attention focuses on assessment to design client-centered intervention, rehabilitation, treatment, or controls that use scientific evidence to support best practice.
期刊最新文献
Between the greenhouse and the classroom: The struggle of mothers working in rural greenhouse agriculture to access preschool education. Impact of 24-hour shifts on interns' gait: A study on sleep deprivation and rest effects. The effect of life satisfaction on work motivation and organizational commitment in workers after the earthquake. Ergonomic challenges and musculoskeletal disorder among female CNC machine operators in the Indian manufacturing industry: An SDG-aligned approach. Challenges to return to work after leave due to work-related musculoskeletal disorders: A systematic review.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1