The impact of histopathological evaluation at transurethral resection of bladder tumour on survival in radical cystectomy candidates

IF 4.4 2区 医学 Q1 UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY BJU International Pub Date : 2025-03-26 DOI:10.1111/bju.16714
Mario de Angelis, Pietro Scilipoti, Alfonso Santangelo, Mattia Longoni, Chiara Lonati, Giovanni Tremolada, Paolo Zaurito, Alessandro Viti, Francesco Pellegrino, Gennaro Musi, Ottavio De Cobelli, Michael Rink, Luca Afferi, Giuseppe Simone, Wojciech Krajewski, Alessandro Antonelli, Maria Angela Cerruto, Stefania Zamboni, Nazareno Suardi, Pierre Karakiewicz, David D'Andrea, Francesco Soria, Morgan Roupret, Laura S. Mertens, Ekaterina Laukhtina, Benjamin Pradere, Andrea Necchi, Alexandre Mottrie, Geert De Naeyer, Shahrokh F. Shariat, Paolo Gontero, Andrea Salonia, Francesco Montorsi, Alberto Briganti, Marco Moschini
{"title":"The impact of histopathological evaluation at transurethral resection of bladder tumour on survival in radical cystectomy candidates","authors":"Mario de Angelis,&nbsp;Pietro Scilipoti,&nbsp;Alfonso Santangelo,&nbsp;Mattia Longoni,&nbsp;Chiara Lonati,&nbsp;Giovanni Tremolada,&nbsp;Paolo Zaurito,&nbsp;Alessandro Viti,&nbsp;Francesco Pellegrino,&nbsp;Gennaro Musi,&nbsp;Ottavio De Cobelli,&nbsp;Michael Rink,&nbsp;Luca Afferi,&nbsp;Giuseppe Simone,&nbsp;Wojciech Krajewski,&nbsp;Alessandro Antonelli,&nbsp;Maria Angela Cerruto,&nbsp;Stefania Zamboni,&nbsp;Nazareno Suardi,&nbsp;Pierre Karakiewicz,&nbsp;David D'Andrea,&nbsp;Francesco Soria,&nbsp;Morgan Roupret,&nbsp;Laura S. Mertens,&nbsp;Ekaterina Laukhtina,&nbsp;Benjamin Pradere,&nbsp;Andrea Necchi,&nbsp;Alexandre Mottrie,&nbsp;Geert De Naeyer,&nbsp;Shahrokh F. Shariat,&nbsp;Paolo Gontero,&nbsp;Andrea Salonia,&nbsp;Francesco Montorsi,&nbsp;Alberto Briganti,&nbsp;Marco Moschini","doi":"10.1111/bju.16714","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Objective</h3>\n \n <p>To evaluate the impact of discordant histological diagnoses between transurethral resection of bladder tumour (TURBT) and radical cystectomy (RC) on cancer-specific mortality (CSM) in patients with bladder cancer (BCa).</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Patients and Methods</h3>\n \n <p>We relied on a multi-institutional database collecting data of patients with BCa who underwent TURBT and subsequent RC from nine centres between 2000 and 2023. We tested concordance rates between TURBT and RC in detecting urothelial carcinoma of the urinary bladder (UCUB) as well as non-UCUB hystological subtypes, using RC as the reference standard. Concordance was defined as the agreement between a specific histological subtype identified both at TURBT and RC and evaluated according to Cohen's kappa coefficient. Subsequently, survival analyses consisted of Kaplan–Meier plots and multivariable Cox regression (MCR) models addressing CSM according to concordance between TURBT and RC (namely, concordant vs discordant).</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>Overall, 3160 patients were identified. Of these, 2762 (87%) harboured UCUB and 398 (13%) non-UCUB at TURBT vs 2481 (79%) UCUB and 679 (21%) non-UCUB at RC. There were 683 (21.6%) patients with a discordant diagnosis between TURBT and RC. The overall concordance in detecting non-UCUB subtypes was defined as fair concordance (Cohen's kappa coefficient: 0.32). In MCR models, a discordant diagnosis exhibited higher CSM relative to those with a concordant diagnosis (hazard ratio [HR] 1.3, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.1–1.6; <i>P</i> = 0.002). In a sensitivity analysis including patients with UCUB not exposed to neoadjuvant chemotherapy, this survival disadvantage was even higher (HR 1.5, 95% CI 1.1–1.7; <i>P</i> = 0.04).</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusions</h3>\n \n <p>A discordant histopathological diagnosis between TURBT and RC is associated with higher CSM rates, particularly in cases initially misdiagnosed as UCUB. However, we also observed a moderate concordance between TURBT and RC in identifying non-UCUB subtypes.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":8985,"journal":{"name":"BJU International","volume":"136 2","pages":"336-343"},"PeriodicalIF":4.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BJU International","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://bjui-journals.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/bju.16714","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective

To evaluate the impact of discordant histological diagnoses between transurethral resection of bladder tumour (TURBT) and radical cystectomy (RC) on cancer-specific mortality (CSM) in patients with bladder cancer (BCa).

Patients and Methods

We relied on a multi-institutional database collecting data of patients with BCa who underwent TURBT and subsequent RC from nine centres between 2000 and 2023. We tested concordance rates between TURBT and RC in detecting urothelial carcinoma of the urinary bladder (UCUB) as well as non-UCUB hystological subtypes, using RC as the reference standard. Concordance was defined as the agreement between a specific histological subtype identified both at TURBT and RC and evaluated according to Cohen's kappa coefficient. Subsequently, survival analyses consisted of Kaplan–Meier plots and multivariable Cox regression (MCR) models addressing CSM according to concordance between TURBT and RC (namely, concordant vs discordant).

Results

Overall, 3160 patients were identified. Of these, 2762 (87%) harboured UCUB and 398 (13%) non-UCUB at TURBT vs 2481 (79%) UCUB and 679 (21%) non-UCUB at RC. There were 683 (21.6%) patients with a discordant diagnosis between TURBT and RC. The overall concordance in detecting non-UCUB subtypes was defined as fair concordance (Cohen's kappa coefficient: 0.32). In MCR models, a discordant diagnosis exhibited higher CSM relative to those with a concordant diagnosis (hazard ratio [HR] 1.3, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.1–1.6; P = 0.002). In a sensitivity analysis including patients with UCUB not exposed to neoadjuvant chemotherapy, this survival disadvantage was even higher (HR 1.5, 95% CI 1.1–1.7; P = 0.04).

Conclusions

A discordant histopathological diagnosis between TURBT and RC is associated with higher CSM rates, particularly in cases initially misdiagnosed as UCUB. However, we also observed a moderate concordance between TURBT and RC in identifying non-UCUB subtypes.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
经尿道膀胱肿瘤切除术组织病理学评估对根治性膀胱切除术患者生存的影响
评价经尿道膀胱肿瘤切除术(turt)和根治性膀胱切除术(RC)的组织学诊断不一致对膀胱癌(BCa)患者癌症特异性死亡率(CSM)的影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
BJU International
BJU International 医学-泌尿学与肾脏学
CiteScore
9.10
自引率
4.40%
发文量
262
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: BJUI is one of the most highly respected medical journals in the world, with a truly international range of published papers and appeal. Every issue gives invaluable practical information in the form of original articles, reviews, comments, surgical education articles, and translational science articles in the field of urology. BJUI employs topical sections, and is in full colour, making it easier to browse or search for something specific.
期刊最新文献
Response to comment by Semwal et al. Comment on 'Prostate zonal impact of 5α-reductase inhibitors on multiparametric MRI characteristics and detection of prostate cancer'. Area deprivation and cancer-specific mortality in non-muscle-invasive bladder cancer: a statewide analysis. Long‐term outcomes for mechanical failure and revision following primary gender‐affirming penile prosthesis insertion Same‐day fluorescence confocal microscopy of MRI ‐targeted prostate biopsies: A feasibility study
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1