Straw Returning Amount and Duration Influence Paddy Soil Organic Carbon Sequestration by Regulating Plant- and Microbe-Derived Carbon Accumulation

IF 3.7 2区 农林科学 Q2 ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES Land Degradation & Development Pub Date : 2025-03-25 DOI:10.1002/ldr.5595
Xiaowei Chen, Gongwen Luo, Ruibin Zhu, Yuping Zhang, Yangji Huang, Chaolin Liao
{"title":"Straw Returning Amount and Duration Influence Paddy Soil Organic Carbon Sequestration by Regulating Plant- and Microbe-Derived Carbon Accumulation","authors":"Xiaowei Chen,&nbsp;Gongwen Luo,&nbsp;Ruibin Zhu,&nbsp;Yuping Zhang,&nbsp;Yangji Huang,&nbsp;Chaolin Liao","doi":"10.1002/ldr.5595","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n <p>Straw-returning-driven sequestration of soil organic carbon (SOC) is critical for cropland carbon (C) storage and stability. However, the effects of plant- and microbe-derived C accumulation in SOC sequestration remain unclear in rice systems. Herein, this study synthetically explored the response of soil microbial necromass and lignin phenols to straw return and assessed their contributions to SOC under two application amounts and durations. The field-based experiment was established in 1982. The results indicated that returning straw to paddy fields significantly increased SOC content by 7%–46%, with a higher return rate and longer duration yielding greater increases. Fungal necromass C (FNC) in paddy soil showed a higher content (3.8–5.9 g kg<sup>−1</sup>) and a higher proportion to SOC (20%–25%) than bacterial necromass C (BNC; 1.6–2.5 g kg<sup>−1</sup> and 9%–11%). However, the amount and duration of straw returns had a small influence on the proportions of the FNC and BNC to SOC. Accumulation of lignin phenols (0.2–0.8 g kg<sup>−1</sup>) in paddy soils and their proportions to SOC (1%–3%) were lower than those of amino sugars (0.7–1.1 g kg<sup>−1</sup> and 3.8%–4.5%) and were not significantly affected by the straw return amount or duration. Soil FNC content was closely associated with soil available nitrogen (AN), microbial biomass C (MBC), and microbial biomass nitrogen (MBN) contents, whereas soil BNC content showed a strong link with AN and MBC contents. Soil lignin phenol content was significantly related to soil AN, available potassium, and MBC contents. Soil FNC and BNC accumulations positively contributed to SOC, whereas soil AN, MBC, and MBN contents indirectly affected SOC by regulating microbial necromass C. These results highlight the benefits of straw return on paddy SOC sequestration, linked to the positive response of plant- and microbe-derived C accumulation.</p>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":203,"journal":{"name":"Land Degradation & Development","volume":"36 11","pages":"3729-3741"},"PeriodicalIF":3.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Land Degradation & Development","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/ldr.5595","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Straw-returning-driven sequestration of soil organic carbon (SOC) is critical for cropland carbon (C) storage and stability. However, the effects of plant- and microbe-derived C accumulation in SOC sequestration remain unclear in rice systems. Herein, this study synthetically explored the response of soil microbial necromass and lignin phenols to straw return and assessed their contributions to SOC under two application amounts and durations. The field-based experiment was established in 1982. The results indicated that returning straw to paddy fields significantly increased SOC content by 7%–46%, with a higher return rate and longer duration yielding greater increases. Fungal necromass C (FNC) in paddy soil showed a higher content (3.8–5.9 g kg−1) and a higher proportion to SOC (20%–25%) than bacterial necromass C (BNC; 1.6–2.5 g kg−1 and 9%–11%). However, the amount and duration of straw returns had a small influence on the proportions of the FNC and BNC to SOC. Accumulation of lignin phenols (0.2–0.8 g kg−1) in paddy soils and their proportions to SOC (1%–3%) were lower than those of amino sugars (0.7–1.1 g kg−1 and 3.8%–4.5%) and were not significantly affected by the straw return amount or duration. Soil FNC content was closely associated with soil available nitrogen (AN), microbial biomass C (MBC), and microbial biomass nitrogen (MBN) contents, whereas soil BNC content showed a strong link with AN and MBC contents. Soil lignin phenol content was significantly related to soil AN, available potassium, and MBC contents. Soil FNC and BNC accumulations positively contributed to SOC, whereas soil AN, MBC, and MBN contents indirectly affected SOC by regulating microbial necromass C. These results highlight the benefits of straw return on paddy SOC sequestration, linked to the positive response of plant- and microbe-derived C accumulation.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
秸秆还田量和还田时长通过调节植物源和微生物源碳积累影响水稻土有机碳固存
秸秆还田驱动的土壤有机碳(SOC)固存对农田碳(C)的储存和稳定至关重要。然而,植物和微生物来源的碳积累对水稻系统有机碳封存的影响尚不清楚。本研究综合探讨了土壤微生物坏死块和木质素酚对秸秆还田的响应,并评估了两种施用量和施用时间下土壤微生物坏死块和木质素酚对土壤有机碳的贡献。这项实地试验于1982年建立。结果表明,秸秆还田可显著提高土壤有机碳含量7% ~ 46%,还田率越高,持续时间越长,提高幅度越大。水稻土真菌坏死团C (FNC)含量(3.8 ~ 5.9 g kg−1)高于细菌坏死团C (BNC),占有机碳的比例(20% ~ 25%)高于细菌坏死团C (BNC);1.6-2.5 g kg - 1和9%-11%)。秸秆还田量和还田时长对土壤有机碳中FNC和BNC的比例影响较小。水稻土木质素酚类积累量(0.2 ~ 0.8 g kg−1)及其占有机碳的比例(1% ~ 3%)低于氨基糖(0.7 ~ 1.1 g kg−1和3.8% ~ 4.5%),且不受秸秆还田量和还田时间的显著影响。土壤FNC含量与土壤有效氮(AN)、微生物生物量C (MBC)和微生物生物量氮(MBN)含量密切相关,而土壤BNC含量与AN和MBC含量密切相关。土壤木质素酚含量与土壤硝态氮、速效钾和MBC含量显著相关。土壤FNC和BNC积累对有机碳有正向贡献,而土壤AN、MBC和MBN含量通过调节微生物坏死体C间接影响有机碳。这些结果表明,秸秆还田对水稻有机碳固存的好处,与植物和微生物来源的碳积累的积极响应有关。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Land Degradation & Development
Land Degradation & Development 农林科学-环境科学
CiteScore
7.70
自引率
8.50%
发文量
379
审稿时长
5.5 months
期刊介绍: Land Degradation & Development is an international journal which seeks to promote rational study of the recognition, monitoring, control and rehabilitation of degradation in terrestrial environments. The journal focuses on: - what land degradation is; - what causes land degradation; - the impacts of land degradation - the scale of land degradation; - the history, current status or future trends of land degradation; - avoidance, mitigation and control of land degradation; - remedial actions to rehabilitate or restore degraded land; - sustainable land management.
期刊最新文献
Reclaimed Well Sites on Salt Affected Soils: Electrical Conductivity and Sodium Adsorption Ratio as Plant Community Response Indicators Diagnosing Ecosystem Service Imbalance: A Machine Learning‐Driven Dissection of Supply–Demand Bundle Dynamics in the Dongting Lake Basin Coal Mining as a Driver of Land Use and Land Cover Change and Degradation: A Case in Moatize City, Mozambique Restoring Acidic Soils for Sustainable Agriculture: A Review of Mechanisms, Microbial Shifts, and Climate Resilience Shift From Promotion to Inhibition: Factors Affecting Soil Organic Carbon Sequestration in Intensive Croplands of the N orth C hina Plain
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1