Experimental investigation of transcritical CO2 mixture power cycle with dual heat sources

IF 11 1区 工程技术 Q1 ENERGY & FUELS Applied Energy Pub Date : 2025-07-01 Epub Date: 2025-03-26 DOI:10.1016/j.apenergy.2025.125758
Jingyu Wang , Zhaohui Xing , Yiwei Yin , Liuchang Sun , Xuanang Zhang , Ligeng Li , Hua Tian , GequnShu
{"title":"Experimental investigation of transcritical CO2 mixture power cycle with dual heat sources","authors":"Jingyu Wang ,&nbsp;Zhaohui Xing ,&nbsp;Yiwei Yin ,&nbsp;Liuchang Sun ,&nbsp;Xuanang Zhang ,&nbsp;Ligeng Li ,&nbsp;Hua Tian ,&nbsp;GequnShu","doi":"10.1016/j.apenergy.2025.125758","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>The CO<sub>2</sub> transcritical power cycle is a prominent technology for utilizing low- and medium-temperature heat sources. To enhance CO<sub>2</sub> cycle performance, CO<sub>2</sub> mixture working fluids are employed to address harsh operating conditions and high pressures. However, comparative experiments on the performance of different additives under various operating conditions have not been conducted. The mechanisms behind performance improvements in real-world environments remain validated. Therefore, this work conducted an experimental investigation on three additives at two mass fractions and pure CO<sub>2</sub>. The test bench utilized two heat sources, hot water and hot air, and the selected working fluids were tested under varying maximum temperatures and pressures. The results demonstrate that the CO<sub>2</sub> mixture working fluids are less suitable for hot water with high specific heat and low temperature, leading to reduced heat absorption and mass flow rate. Nevertheless, the CO<sub>2</sub> mixture working fluids can significantly reduce condensing pressure by up to 20 % under identical condensing conditions. Compared to pure CO<sub>2</sub>, the mixture working fluids show relative improvements of 2.45 % in maximum net power output and 19.46 % in thermal efficiency. CO<sub>2</sub> mixture working fluids exhibit a greater performance advantage over pure CO<sub>2</sub> at lower maximum pressure. Recommendations for selecting working fluid to maximize net power output are provided. This work provides operational data for CO<sub>2</sub> mixture working fluids in real-world environments, demonstrates their effect on the matching of heat and cold sources, verifies the potential of CO<sub>2</sub> mixtures to replace pure CO<sub>2</sub>, and offers motivation for future research and component development.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":246,"journal":{"name":"Applied Energy","volume":"389 ","pages":"Article 125758"},"PeriodicalIF":11.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Applied Energy","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S030626192500488X","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/3/26 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENERGY & FUELS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The CO2 transcritical power cycle is a prominent technology for utilizing low- and medium-temperature heat sources. To enhance CO2 cycle performance, CO2 mixture working fluids are employed to address harsh operating conditions and high pressures. However, comparative experiments on the performance of different additives under various operating conditions have not been conducted. The mechanisms behind performance improvements in real-world environments remain validated. Therefore, this work conducted an experimental investigation on three additives at two mass fractions and pure CO2. The test bench utilized two heat sources, hot water and hot air, and the selected working fluids were tested under varying maximum temperatures and pressures. The results demonstrate that the CO2 mixture working fluids are less suitable for hot water with high specific heat and low temperature, leading to reduced heat absorption and mass flow rate. Nevertheless, the CO2 mixture working fluids can significantly reduce condensing pressure by up to 20 % under identical condensing conditions. Compared to pure CO2, the mixture working fluids show relative improvements of 2.45 % in maximum net power output and 19.46 % in thermal efficiency. CO2 mixture working fluids exhibit a greater performance advantage over pure CO2 at lower maximum pressure. Recommendations for selecting working fluid to maximize net power output are provided. This work provides operational data for CO2 mixture working fluids in real-world environments, demonstrates their effect on the matching of heat and cold sources, verifies the potential of CO2 mixtures to replace pure CO2, and offers motivation for future research and component development.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
双热源跨临界CO2混合动力循环实验研究
二氧化碳跨临界动力循环是利用中低温热源的重要技术。为了提高二氧化碳循环性能,采用二氧化碳混合工作液来应对恶劣的工作条件和高压。但目前还没有对不同添加剂在不同工况下的性能进行对比实验。实际环境中性能改进背后的机制仍然是有效的。因此,本工作对三种添加剂在两个质量分数和纯CO2下进行了实验研究。试验台采用热水和热空气两种热源,对所选工质在不同的最高温度和压力下进行了试验。结果表明:CO2混合工质不适合高比热和低温的热水,导致吸热和质量流量降低;然而,在相同的冷凝条件下,二氧化碳混合工质可以显著降低冷凝压力达20%。与纯二氧化碳相比,混合工液的最大净输出功率提高了2.45%,热效率提高了19.46%。在较低的最大压力下,二氧化碳混合工质表现出比纯二氧化碳更大的性能优势。建议选择工作流体,以最大限度地提高净功率输出。这项工作提供了实际环境中二氧化碳混合工质的运行数据,展示了它们对冷热源匹配的影响,验证了二氧化碳混合物取代纯二氧化碳的潜力,并为未来的研究和组件开发提供了动力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Applied Energy
Applied Energy 工程技术-工程:化工
CiteScore
21.20
自引率
10.70%
发文量
1830
审稿时长
41 days
期刊介绍: Applied Energy serves as a platform for sharing innovations, research, development, and demonstrations in energy conversion, conservation, and sustainable energy systems. The journal covers topics such as optimal energy resource use, environmental pollutant mitigation, and energy process analysis. It welcomes original papers, review articles, technical notes, and letters to the editor. Authors are encouraged to submit manuscripts that bridge the gap between research, development, and implementation. The journal addresses a wide spectrum of topics, including fossil and renewable energy technologies, energy economics, and environmental impacts. Applied Energy also explores modeling and forecasting, conservation strategies, and the social and economic implications of energy policies, including climate change mitigation. It is complemented by the open-access journal Advances in Applied Energy.
期刊最新文献
Privacy-preserving transfer learning framework for building energy forecasting with fully anonymized data Robust Koopman EMPC for optimal frequency regulation of VSC-MTDC systems Operational decision of wind–photovoltaic–energy storage integrated system in day-ahead and ancillary service joint market considering weather variability Collaborative governance of carbon mitigation, energy transition, and material management: A factorial non-deterministic carbon-energy-metal nexus optimization model Systematic under-representation of ERA5 10 m wind speeds in the ERA5-land product undermines wind energy studies
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1