Advances in steam electrolysis for green hydrogen production: Current status and future outlook

IF 7.5 1区 工程技术 Q2 ENERGY & FUELS Fuel Pub Date : 2025-03-27 DOI:10.1016/j.fuel.2025.135165
Ait Mimoune Hamiche , Amine Boudghene Stambouli , Mohammed Tarik Benmessaoud , Yojiro Kitamura
{"title":"Advances in steam electrolysis for green hydrogen production: Current status and future outlook","authors":"Ait Mimoune Hamiche ,&nbsp;Amine Boudghene Stambouli ,&nbsp;Mohammed Tarik Benmessaoud ,&nbsp;Yojiro Kitamura","doi":"10.1016/j.fuel.2025.135165","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>As renewable energy sources increasingly dominate electricity generation, hydrogen is emerging as an important energy carrier, particularly through electrolysis. Among the various methods, steam electrolysis, in particular via solid oxide electrolysis cells (SOEC) and high-temperature proton exchange membranes (PEM), is gaining ground due to its efficiency and potential for large-scale hydrogen production. The global push for green hydrogen is supported by various government policies aimed at reducing carbon emissions and promoting the integration of renewable energies. Countries are investing in R&amp;D to reduce costs and improve electrolyzer reliability. Analysis of solid oxide electrolysis (SOEC) cells and proton exchange membrane (PEM) steam electrolysis reveals distinct operational characteristics and applications. SOECs excel in high-temperature environments, while PEM technology is more suited to low-temperature applications. This study examines the key cell components of both technologies, describing their material properties and degradation issues. A comprehensive review of the impact of operational conditions on cell efficiency and longevity for both technologies is carried out. The comparative analysis of the two electrolysis methods highlights their unique advantages and limitations, shedding light on their specific application contexts. Given the relatively limited investigation into PEM steam electrolysis, this review concludes by suggesting that future research should focus on optimizing cell components, integrating renewable energy sources and investigating the utilization of seawater as a precursor for the generation of green hydrogen.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":325,"journal":{"name":"Fuel","volume":"395 ","pages":"Article 135165"},"PeriodicalIF":7.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Fuel","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0016236125008907","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENERGY & FUELS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

As renewable energy sources increasingly dominate electricity generation, hydrogen is emerging as an important energy carrier, particularly through electrolysis. Among the various methods, steam electrolysis, in particular via solid oxide electrolysis cells (SOEC) and high-temperature proton exchange membranes (PEM), is gaining ground due to its efficiency and potential for large-scale hydrogen production. The global push for green hydrogen is supported by various government policies aimed at reducing carbon emissions and promoting the integration of renewable energies. Countries are investing in R&D to reduce costs and improve electrolyzer reliability. Analysis of solid oxide electrolysis (SOEC) cells and proton exchange membrane (PEM) steam electrolysis reveals distinct operational characteristics and applications. SOECs excel in high-temperature environments, while PEM technology is more suited to low-temperature applications. This study examines the key cell components of both technologies, describing their material properties and degradation issues. A comprehensive review of the impact of operational conditions on cell efficiency and longevity for both technologies is carried out. The comparative analysis of the two electrolysis methods highlights their unique advantages and limitations, shedding light on their specific application contexts. Given the relatively limited investigation into PEM steam electrolysis, this review concludes by suggesting that future research should focus on optimizing cell components, integrating renewable energy sources and investigating the utilization of seawater as a precursor for the generation of green hydrogen.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
蒸汽电解绿色制氢研究进展:现状与展望
随着可再生能源日益主导发电,氢正成为一种重要的能源载体,特别是通过电解。在各种方法中,蒸汽电解,特别是通过固体氧化物电解电池(SOEC)和高温质子交换膜(PEM),由于其效率和大规模制氢的潜力而获得了广泛的应用。全球对绿色氢的推动得到了旨在减少碳排放和促进可再生能源整合的各种政府政策的支持。各国正在投资研发,以降低成本,提高电解槽的可靠性。固体氧化物电解(SOEC)电池和质子交换膜(PEM)蒸汽电解的分析揭示了不同的操作特性和应用。soec在高温环境中表现优异,而PEM技术更适合低温应用。本研究考察了这两种技术的关键电池组件,描述了它们的材料特性和降解问题。对两种技术的操作条件对电池效率和寿命的影响进行了全面的审查。通过对两种电解方法的比较分析,突出了其独特的优点和局限性,揭示了其具体的应用环境。鉴于PEM蒸汽电解的研究相对有限,本文建议未来的研究应集中在优化电池组件,整合可再生能源以及研究利用海水作为生成绿色氢的前体。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Fuel
Fuel 工程技术-工程:化工
CiteScore
12.80
自引率
20.30%
发文量
3506
审稿时长
64 days
期刊介绍: The exploration of energy sources remains a critical matter of study. For the past nine decades, fuel has consistently held the forefront in primary research efforts within the field of energy science. This area of investigation encompasses a wide range of subjects, with a particular emphasis on emerging concerns like environmental factors and pollution.
期刊最新文献
Relationship of catalytic performance and catalyst structure evolution based on pressurized CH4-CO2 reforming reaction over carbon-supported Co-Ir alloy catalysts Enhanced in-situ catalytic hydropyrolysis of enzymatic hydrolysis lignin: Co-processing impregnated nickel formate as a recyclable Ni precursor Encapsulation of fluororubber/nitrocellulose to improve the ignition and combustion of aluminum particles Investigating the emissions and flame structures of lean premixed partially cracked ammonia flames stabilized in a bluff-body burner Nickel selenide-based electrocatalysts for hydrogen evolution, oxygen evolution, and oxygen reduction reactions: recent strategies, challenges, and perspectives
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1