Emission reduction effects of electric vehicle promotion and application pilots: Cooperative pilots vs single pilots

IF 6.8 1区 工程技术 Q1 ECONOMICS Transportation Research Part A-Policy and Practice Pub Date : 2025-05-01 Epub Date: 2025-03-27 DOI:10.1016/j.tra.2025.104456
Xiaolei Zhao , Xuemei Li , Yiran Liu , Yumeng Mao
{"title":"Emission reduction effects of electric vehicle promotion and application pilots: Cooperative pilots vs single pilots","authors":"Xiaolei Zhao ,&nbsp;Xuemei Li ,&nbsp;Yiran Liu ,&nbsp;Yumeng Mao","doi":"10.1016/j.tra.2025.104456","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Previous studies have estimated the effectiveness of electric vehicle (EV) promotion policy pilots based on inter-city competition. However, the effectiveness of introducing inter-city cooperation mechanisms into these pilots remains unclear. Our study examines the EV promotion and application policy pilots initiated in 2013, focusing on “single pilots” established by single cities and “cooperative pilots” formed by groups of cities. Using panel data from 280 Chinese cities from 2003 to 2019, we employ the time-varying difference-in-differences method to analyze the carbon emission reduction effects of both single and cooperative pilots and explore potential spatial spillover effects. Results show that single pilots significantly reduce carbon emissions in the implementing cities, with this effect being more pronounced in smaller cities and those with high-speed rail systems. However, the impact of cooperative pilots is not significant. Among the single pilots, cities that participated in the previous “Ten Cities, Thousand Vehicles” pilot achieved better carbon emission reduction outcomes, but this advantage is not evident in the cooperative pilots. Furthermore, when considering the spillover effects, both single and cooperative pilots significantly promote carbon emission reduction in neighboring cities, with cooperative pilots leading to a larger spillover effect than single pilots. This study provides theoretical guidance and insights for optimizing the design of industrial policy pilots.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":49421,"journal":{"name":"Transportation Research Part A-Policy and Practice","volume":"195 ","pages":"Article 104456"},"PeriodicalIF":6.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Transportation Research Part A-Policy and Practice","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0965856425000849","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/3/27 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ECONOMICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Previous studies have estimated the effectiveness of electric vehicle (EV) promotion policy pilots based on inter-city competition. However, the effectiveness of introducing inter-city cooperation mechanisms into these pilots remains unclear. Our study examines the EV promotion and application policy pilots initiated in 2013, focusing on “single pilots” established by single cities and “cooperative pilots” formed by groups of cities. Using panel data from 280 Chinese cities from 2003 to 2019, we employ the time-varying difference-in-differences method to analyze the carbon emission reduction effects of both single and cooperative pilots and explore potential spatial spillover effects. Results show that single pilots significantly reduce carbon emissions in the implementing cities, with this effect being more pronounced in smaller cities and those with high-speed rail systems. However, the impact of cooperative pilots is not significant. Among the single pilots, cities that participated in the previous “Ten Cities, Thousand Vehicles” pilot achieved better carbon emission reduction outcomes, but this advantage is not evident in the cooperative pilots. Furthermore, when considering the spillover effects, both single and cooperative pilots significantly promote carbon emission reduction in neighboring cities, with cooperative pilots leading to a larger spillover effect than single pilots. This study provides theoretical guidance and insights for optimizing the design of industrial policy pilots.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
电动汽车推广应用试点的减排效果:合作试点vs单一试点
以往的研究基于城市间竞争来评估电动汽车推广政策试点的有效性。然而,在这些试点中引入城市间合作机制的有效性尚不清楚。本研究考察了2013年启动的电动汽车推广应用政策试点,重点研究了单个城市建立的“单一试点”和由多个城市组成的“合作试点”。利用2003 - 2019年中国280个城市的面板数据,采用时变差中差法分析了单一试点和合作试点的碳减排效果,并探讨了潜在的空间溢出效应。结果表明,单个试点显著降低了实施城市的碳排放,在规模较小的城市和拥有高铁系统的城市中,这种效果更为明显。然而,合作试点的影响并不显著。在单一试点中,以往参与“十城千车”试点的城市碳减排效果较好,但在合作试点中这种优势并不明显。此外,考虑溢出效应时,单一试点和合作试点均显著促进了相邻城市的碳减排,且合作试点的溢出效应大于单一试点。本研究为优化产业政策试点设计提供了理论指导和见解。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
13.20
自引率
7.80%
发文量
257
审稿时长
9.8 months
期刊介绍: Transportation Research: Part A contains papers of general interest in all passenger and freight transportation modes: policy analysis, formulation and evaluation; planning; interaction with the political, socioeconomic and physical environment; design, management and evaluation of transportation systems. Topics are approached from any discipline or perspective: economics, engineering, sociology, psychology, etc. Case studies, survey and expository papers are included, as are articles which contribute to unification of the field, or to an understanding of the comparative aspects of different systems. Papers which assess the scope for technological innovation within a social or political framework are also published. The journal is international, and places equal emphasis on the problems of industrialized and non-industrialized regions. Part A''s aims and scope are complementary to Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Part C: Emerging Technologies and Part D: Transport and Environment. Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review. Part F: Traffic Psychology and Behaviour. The complete set forms the most cohesive and comprehensive reference of current research in transportation science.
期刊最新文献
Assessing the impact of the Paris 2024 Olympic Games on bicycle lane utilization with electric bike-sharing data Evaluating the carbon emission impacts of shifting to ride-pooling: A user group perspective Bilevel subsidy-enabled mobility hub network design with perturbed utility coalitional choice-based assignment Comparing delay-, distance-, and cordon-based congestion pricing strategies via large-scale simulation Do intentions translate into use? Transit market evolution and intention-behavior gaps after a new BRT service in Montreal, Canada
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1