The influence of carbon perception on sustainable behaviors: Tailoring sustainability strategies based on individuals' levels of openness to green technology adoption

IF 5.3 Q2 ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES Cleaner and Responsible Consumption Pub Date : 2025-06-01 Epub Date: 2025-03-24 DOI:10.1016/j.clrc.2025.100270
Sasichakorn Wongsaichia , Teerapong Pienwisetkaew , Wanwisa Wannapipat , Khwanjira Ponsree , Chavis Ketkaew
{"title":"The influence of carbon perception on sustainable behaviors: Tailoring sustainability strategies based on individuals' levels of openness to green technology adoption","authors":"Sasichakorn Wongsaichia ,&nbsp;Teerapong Pienwisetkaew ,&nbsp;Wanwisa Wannapipat ,&nbsp;Khwanjira Ponsree ,&nbsp;Chavis Ketkaew","doi":"10.1016/j.clrc.2025.100270","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Global concerns over rising carbon emissions emphasize the critical role of individual actions in mitigating climate change. Technology provides a powerful means to support sustainable behavior, offering tools that help individuals monitor, manage, and reduce their carbon footprints effectively. This study extends the value-belief-norm theory to examine how perceived carbon impact influences sustainable behavior, focusing on how openness to green technology adoption (traditionalists versus technology enthusiasts) moderates this relationship. We explore both direct and indirect pathways from perceived carbon impact to sustainable behavior, with environmental awareness and intention to adopt green technology as key mediators. Using multigroup structural equation modeling, data from 542 users of a carbon footprint platform in Thailand were analyzed. Results reveal distinct pathways: traditionalists rely on an indirect route where perceived carbon impact promotes sustainable behavior through enhanced environmental awareness and intention, while technology enthusiasts display a direct link between perceived carbon impact and sustainable behavior. Despite these differences, the overall effect of perceived carbon impact on sustainable behavior remains similar across groups. These findings underscore the need for targeted sustainability interventions. For traditionalists, strategies that build environmental awareness and foster intentions to adopt green technologies are more effective, whereas for technology enthusiasts, emphasizing direct technology-enabled actions can drive significant behavioral change.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":34617,"journal":{"name":"Cleaner and Responsible Consumption","volume":"17 ","pages":"Article 100270"},"PeriodicalIF":5.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cleaner and Responsible Consumption","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S266678432500021X","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/3/24 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Global concerns over rising carbon emissions emphasize the critical role of individual actions in mitigating climate change. Technology provides a powerful means to support sustainable behavior, offering tools that help individuals monitor, manage, and reduce their carbon footprints effectively. This study extends the value-belief-norm theory to examine how perceived carbon impact influences sustainable behavior, focusing on how openness to green technology adoption (traditionalists versus technology enthusiasts) moderates this relationship. We explore both direct and indirect pathways from perceived carbon impact to sustainable behavior, with environmental awareness and intention to adopt green technology as key mediators. Using multigroup structural equation modeling, data from 542 users of a carbon footprint platform in Thailand were analyzed. Results reveal distinct pathways: traditionalists rely on an indirect route where perceived carbon impact promotes sustainable behavior through enhanced environmental awareness and intention, while technology enthusiasts display a direct link between perceived carbon impact and sustainable behavior. Despite these differences, the overall effect of perceived carbon impact on sustainable behavior remains similar across groups. These findings underscore the need for targeted sustainability interventions. For traditionalists, strategies that build environmental awareness and foster intentions to adopt green technologies are more effective, whereas for technology enthusiasts, emphasizing direct technology-enabled actions can drive significant behavioral change.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
碳感知对可持续行为的影响:基于个人对绿色技术采用的开放程度来定制可持续战略
全球对碳排放上升的担忧强调了个人行动在减缓气候变化方面的关键作用。技术为支持可持续行为提供了强有力的手段,提供了帮助个人有效监测、管理和减少碳足迹的工具。本研究扩展了价值信念规范理论来研究感知碳影响如何影响可持续行为,重点关注对绿色技术采用的开放程度(传统主义者与技术爱好者)如何调节这种关系。我们探索了从感知碳影响到可持续行为的直接和间接途径,并将环保意识和采用绿色技术的意图作为关键中介。采用多组结构方程模型,对泰国某碳足迹平台542名用户的数据进行了分析。结果揭示了不同的途径:传统主义者依赖于间接途径,即感知到的碳影响通过增强环境意识和意图来促进可持续行为,而技术爱好者则显示了感知到的碳影响与可持续行为之间的直接联系。尽管存在这些差异,但感知到的碳影响对可持续行为的总体影响在各组之间仍然相似。这些发现强调了有针对性的可持续性干预措施的必要性。对于传统主义者来说,建立环境意识和培养采用绿色技术的意图的策略更有效,而对于技术爱好者来说,强调直接的技术支持行动可以推动重大的行为改变。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Cleaner and Responsible Consumption
Cleaner and Responsible Consumption Social Sciences-Social Sciences (miscellaneous)
CiteScore
4.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
40
审稿时长
99 days
期刊最新文献
Cultivating demand: A systematic literature review on agroecology's role in consumer behavior Agrochemicals brands preferences and repurchasing decisions for sustainable input marketing to support cocoa production in Ghana From waste to sustainability: Exploring consumer purchase intentions of milk enriched with upcycled peanut skins From information to action: Determinants and effects of sustainability-related information seeking in the organic beverage sector Segmentation of household behavioural types associated with food waste generation in the Republic of Ireland
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1