Reclaiming homeland - An evaluation of traditional land use planning in oils sands mine closure and reclamation plans

IF 10.2 2区 经济学 0 ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES Resources Policy Pub Date : 2025-04-01 Epub Date: 2025-03-27 DOI:10.1016/j.resourpol.2025.105552
Christine A. Daly , Ryan Grandjambe , Jean L’Hommecourt , Gillian Donald , Bori Arrobo , S. Craig Gerlach , Dan McCarthy , Don AhnAhnsisi McIntyre
{"title":"Reclaiming homeland - An evaluation of traditional land use planning in oils sands mine closure and reclamation plans","authors":"Christine A. Daly ,&nbsp;Ryan Grandjambe ,&nbsp;Jean L’Hommecourt ,&nbsp;Gillian Donald ,&nbsp;Bori Arrobo ,&nbsp;S. Craig Gerlach ,&nbsp;Dan McCarthy ,&nbsp;Don AhnAhnsisi McIntyre","doi":"10.1016/j.resourpol.2025.105552","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>This paper presents a systematic review of traditional land use planning in mine closure and reclamation at seven oil sands mines operating in the traditional territory of Fort McKay First Nation, Alberta, Canada. Life of Mine Closure Plans lacked evidence that consultation and engagement with local Indigenous communities on mine closure and reclamation was guided by principles and actions towards truth and reconciliation. While all plans stated that traditional land use was one of the planned outcomes, there was limited evidence of planning for the renewal of cultural landscapes and relationships. A critical gap and opportunity for reclaiming Indigenous homelands is to align provincial mine closure and reclamation policy and law with national and international Indigenous rights law and policy. This is an essential step to sustain the community and culture of local Indigenous communities, like Fort McKay First Nation, who are interconnected with their traditional lands, waters, and practices.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":20970,"journal":{"name":"Resources Policy","volume":"103 ","pages":"Article 105552"},"PeriodicalIF":10.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Resources Policy","FirstCategoryId":"96","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0301420725000947","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/3/27 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"0","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This paper presents a systematic review of traditional land use planning in mine closure and reclamation at seven oil sands mines operating in the traditional territory of Fort McKay First Nation, Alberta, Canada. Life of Mine Closure Plans lacked evidence that consultation and engagement with local Indigenous communities on mine closure and reclamation was guided by principles and actions towards truth and reconciliation. While all plans stated that traditional land use was one of the planned outcomes, there was limited evidence of planning for the renewal of cultural landscapes and relationships. A critical gap and opportunity for reclaiming Indigenous homelands is to align provincial mine closure and reclamation policy and law with national and international Indigenous rights law and policy. This is an essential step to sustain the community and culture of local Indigenous communities, like Fort McKay First Nation, who are interconnected with their traditional lands, waters, and practices.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
复垦家园——油砂矿山关闭复垦方案中传统土地利用规划的评价
本文系统地回顾了在加拿大阿尔伯塔省麦凯堡第一民族传统领土上经营的七个油砂矿山关闭和复垦中的传统土地利用规划。《矿山关闭寿命计划》缺乏证据表明,与当地土著社区就矿山关闭和复垦进行的磋商和接触是在寻求真相与和解的原则和行动的指导下进行的。虽然所有的规划都指出,传统的土地使用是规划结果之一,但关于文化景观和文化关系更新的规划证据有限。恢复土著家园的一个关键差距和机会是使省级矿山关闭和开垦政策和法律与国家和国际土著权利法律和政策保持一致。这是维持当地土著社区的社区和文化的重要一步,比如麦凯堡第一民族,他们与传统的土地、水域和习俗息息相关。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Resources Policy
Resources Policy ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES-
CiteScore
13.40
自引率
23.50%
发文量
602
审稿时长
69 days
期刊介绍: Resources Policy is an international journal focused on the economics and policy aspects of mineral and fossil fuel extraction, production, and utilization. It targets individuals in academia, government, and industry. The journal seeks original research submissions analyzing public policy, economics, social science, geography, and finance in the fields of mining, non-fuel minerals, energy minerals, fossil fuels, and metals. Mineral economics topics covered include mineral market analysis, price analysis, project evaluation, mining and sustainable development, mineral resource rents, resource curse, mineral wealth and corruption, mineral taxation and regulation, strategic minerals and their supply, and the impact of mineral development on local communities and indigenous populations. The journal specifically excludes papers with agriculture, forestry, or fisheries as their primary focus.
期刊最新文献
Safety culture maturity, personal attributes, and accident experience: A study of the Ghanaian small-scale mining sector “We are Makurukuru: Gold helps us to stand firm as a human being, as women”: What can we learn from Uganda about the evolution of artisanal and small-scale mining? Adaptive royalty formulations for critical minerals amid fiscal volatility and geopolitical uncertainty Mining energy transition minerals threatens conservation and traditional peoples of the Brazilian Amazon Editorial Board
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1