Exploring the Relationships Among Little-C, Big-C, and Divergent Thinking: A Resting-State fMRI Study

IF 3 2区 心理学 Q2 PSYCHOLOGY, EDUCATIONAL Journal of Creative Behavior Pub Date : 2025-03-26 DOI:10.1002/jocb.70014
Xiaojin Liu, Zhenni Gao, Xinuo Qiao, Xintong He, Wen Liu, Naiyi Wang
{"title":"Exploring the Relationships Among Little-C, Big-C, and Divergent Thinking: A Resting-State fMRI Study","authors":"Xiaojin Liu,&nbsp;Zhenni Gao,&nbsp;Xinuo Qiao,&nbsp;Xintong He,&nbsp;Wen Liu,&nbsp;Naiyi Wang","doi":"10.1002/jocb.70014","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n <p>Previous studies tend to focus on two facets of creativity: everyday creativity (little-C) and actual creative achievement (Big-C). While little-C and Big-C both involve divergent thinking (DT), the role of DT in their relationship remains unclear. Here, we assessed the creativity scores of 64 adults, including the Creative Behavior Inventory (CBI), Creative Achievement Questionnaire (CAQ), the Abbreviated Torrance Test for Adults (ATTA), and their resting-state functional magnetic resonance imaging data. We subsequently analyzed the functional network dynamics, estimated the mediating effect of divergent thinking on the relationship between little-C and Big-C, and explored whether functional network dynamics moderate their relationship. The results showed that divergent thinking had a mediating effect on the relationship between little-C and Big-C. Dynamic neural activity in the attention and sensorimotor networks was associated with little-C, and the auditory, cognitive, and basal ganglia systems were related to Big-C. The average local efficiency of the default mode network played a moderating role in the relationship between little-C and Big-C. Our findings revealed that everyday creativity and creative achievement are interrelated, with DT playing a key role in their association.</p>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":39915,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Creative Behavior","volume":"59 2","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Creative Behavior","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/jocb.70014","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, EDUCATIONAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Previous studies tend to focus on two facets of creativity: everyday creativity (little-C) and actual creative achievement (Big-C). While little-C and Big-C both involve divergent thinking (DT), the role of DT in their relationship remains unclear. Here, we assessed the creativity scores of 64 adults, including the Creative Behavior Inventory (CBI), Creative Achievement Questionnaire (CAQ), the Abbreviated Torrance Test for Adults (ATTA), and their resting-state functional magnetic resonance imaging data. We subsequently analyzed the functional network dynamics, estimated the mediating effect of divergent thinking on the relationship between little-C and Big-C, and explored whether functional network dynamics moderate their relationship. The results showed that divergent thinking had a mediating effect on the relationship between little-C and Big-C. Dynamic neural activity in the attention and sensorimotor networks was associated with little-C, and the auditory, cognitive, and basal ganglia systems were related to Big-C. The average local efficiency of the default mode network played a moderating role in the relationship between little-C and Big-C. Our findings revealed that everyday creativity and creative achievement are interrelated, with DT playing a key role in their association.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
探索小c、大c和发散思维之间的关系:一项静息状态功能磁共振成像研究
以前的研究倾向于关注创造力的两个方面:日常创造力(小c)和实际创造性成就(大c)。虽然小c和大c都涉及发散性思维(DT),但DT在它们的关系中所起的作用尚不清楚。本文采用创造性行为量表(CBI)、创造性成就问卷(CAQ)、成人简略托伦斯测验(ATTA)和静息状态功能磁共振成像(mri)数据对64名成人的创造性得分进行了评估。随后,我们分析了功能网络动力学,估计了发散思维对小c和大c之间关系的中介作用,并探讨了功能网络动力学是否调节了它们之间的关系。结果表明,发散思维对小c和大c之间的关系有中介作用。注意和感觉运动网络中的动态神经活动与little-C有关,而听觉、认知和基底神经节系统与Big-C有关。默认模式网络的平均局部效率在小c和大c之间的关系中起调节作用。我们的研究结果表明,日常创造力和创造性成就是相互关联的,DT在它们之间的联系中起着关键作用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Creative Behavior
Journal of Creative Behavior Arts and Humanities-Visual Arts and Performing Arts
CiteScore
7.50
自引率
7.70%
发文量
44
期刊介绍: The Journal of Creative Behavior is our quarterly academic journal citing the most current research in creative thinking. For nearly four decades JCB has been the benchmark scientific periodical in the field. It provides up to date cutting-edge ideas about creativity in education, psychology, business, arts and more.
期刊最新文献
Beyond Imagination: Developing and Validating the Young Children's Inventory of Creative Activities The PISA 2022 Creative Thinking Assessment: A Welcome Opportunity to Explore the Mechanics of Flexibility Scoring Cognitive Conflict in Rule Violation and Creativity: Evidence for a Shared Cognitive Basis Do Fans of Violent Stories Show a Higher Potential for Creative Harm? True Crime as a Stimulating Environment for Malevolent Creativity Using Immersive Technology to Understand the Effect of Emotional Shift on Creativity
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1