People Living With Dementia and Their Families as Educators for Social Justice

IF 3.2 3区 医学 Q2 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES Health Expectations Pub Date : 2025-03-27 DOI:10.1111/hex.70244
Clare Mason, Ana Barbosa, Danielle Jones, Michael Andrews, Andrea Capstick
{"title":"People Living With Dementia and Their Families as Educators for Social Justice","authors":"Clare Mason,&nbsp;Ana Barbosa,&nbsp;Danielle Jones,&nbsp;Michael Andrews,&nbsp;Andrea Capstick","doi":"10.1111/hex.70244","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Background</h3>\n \n <p>It is increasingly recognised that dementia education and training should include the direct voices of Experts by Experience (people living with dementia and their families). Good practice in facilitating teaching roles for people living with dementia needs to be identified to maximise inclusion and promote social justice.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Objective</h3>\n \n <p>This study aims to discuss the co-creation of a suite of learning modules on dementia, whose predetermined content was consistent with the three tiers of the UK Dementia Training Standards (DTS), which include filmed interviews with people living with dementia and family members.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Design</h3>\n \n <p>Experts by Experience advised on content and took part in filmed interviews contributing to the development of 14 interactive learning modules based on the DTS curriculum. The process was evaluated using (1) participant and facilitator reflection on the film-making process and (2) independent researcher analysis of the films' content.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>Seven people living with dementia and 10 family members took part. Four key points are identified regarding good practice in the co-creation of film-based learning materials with people living with dementia and their families. Five key themes are identified from the films' content, highlighting Experts by Experience spontaneous reference to experiences of perceived injustice related to their diagnosis, independently of the intended content of the module.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusion</h3>\n \n <p>The active involvement of people living with dementia and their families in practitioner and professional education requires us to pay close attention to what they say. Learning materials should be Expert by Experience-led rather than curriculum-led.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Patient or Public Contribution</h3>\n \n <p>People living with dementia and their families were involved in the design, conduct and evaluation of the study and in the preparation of the manuscript.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":55070,"journal":{"name":"Health Expectations","volume":"28 2","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/hex.70244","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Health Expectations","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/hex.70244","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

It is increasingly recognised that dementia education and training should include the direct voices of Experts by Experience (people living with dementia and their families). Good practice in facilitating teaching roles for people living with dementia needs to be identified to maximise inclusion and promote social justice.

Objective

This study aims to discuss the co-creation of a suite of learning modules on dementia, whose predetermined content was consistent with the three tiers of the UK Dementia Training Standards (DTS), which include filmed interviews with people living with dementia and family members.

Design

Experts by Experience advised on content and took part in filmed interviews contributing to the development of 14 interactive learning modules based on the DTS curriculum. The process was evaluated using (1) participant and facilitator reflection on the film-making process and (2) independent researcher analysis of the films' content.

Results

Seven people living with dementia and 10 family members took part. Four key points are identified regarding good practice in the co-creation of film-based learning materials with people living with dementia and their families. Five key themes are identified from the films' content, highlighting Experts by Experience spontaneous reference to experiences of perceived injustice related to their diagnosis, independently of the intended content of the module.

Conclusion

The active involvement of people living with dementia and their families in practitioner and professional education requires us to pay close attention to what they say. Learning materials should be Expert by Experience-led rather than curriculum-led.

Patient or Public Contribution

People living with dementia and their families were involved in the design, conduct and evaluation of the study and in the preparation of the manuscript.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
痴呆症患者及其家庭作为社会正义的教育者
背景 越来越多的人认识到,痴呆症教育和培训应包括 "体验专家"(痴呆症患者及其家人)的直接意见。需要确定促进痴呆症患者担任教学角色的良好做法,以最大限度地实现包容性和促进社会公正。 本研究旨在讨论共同创建一套有关痴呆症的学习模块,其预先确定的内容符合英国痴呆症培训标准(DTS)的三个等级,其中包括对痴呆症患者及其家人的拍摄访谈。 体验设计专家就内容提出了建议,并参与了拍摄访谈,为开发基于 DTS 课程的 14 个互动学习模块做出了贡献。评估过程包括:(1)参与者和主持人对影片制作过程的反思;(2)独立研究人员对影片内容的分析。 结果 七名痴呆症患者和十名家庭成员参加了活动。在与痴呆症患者及其家人共同制作以电影为基础的学习材料方面,确定了四个关键点。从影片内容中确定了五个关键主题,其中突出了 "经验专家"(Experts by Experience)自发提及的与诊断相关的不公正感,与模块的预期内容无关。 结论 要让痴呆症患者及其家人积极参与从业人员和专业教育,我们就必须密切关注他们所说的话。学习材料应以经验为导向,而不是以课程为导向。 患者或公众的贡献 痴呆症患者及其家属参与了本研究的设计、实施和评估,并参与了手稿的撰写。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Health Expectations
Health Expectations 医学-公共卫生、环境卫生与职业卫生
CiteScore
5.20
自引率
9.40%
发文量
251
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Health Expectations promotes critical thinking and informed debate about all aspects of patient and public involvement and engagement (PPIE) in health and social care, health policy and health services research including: • Person-centred care and quality improvement • Patients'' participation in decisions about disease prevention and management • Public perceptions of health services • Citizen involvement in health care policy making and priority-setting • Methods for monitoring and evaluating participation • Empowerment and consumerism • Patients'' role in safety and quality • Patient and public role in health services research • Co-production (researchers working with patients and the public) of research, health care and policy Health Expectations is a quarterly, peer-reviewed journal publishing original research, review articles and critical commentaries. It includes papers which clarify concepts, develop theories, and critically analyse and evaluate specific policies and practices. The Journal provides an inter-disciplinary and international forum in which researchers (including PPIE researchers) from a range of backgrounds and expertise can present their work to other researchers, policy-makers, health care professionals, managers, patients and consumer advocates.
期刊最新文献
'What Do People With Long Covid Want From Healthcare Services?' A Qualitative Exploration From Lived Experience. Lived Experiences of Returning to Participation After Mild Stroke: A Phenomenological Study in Spain. Preconception Perceptions, Knowledge and Behaviours of Women With Gestational Diabetes Mellitus: A Qualitative Study. Social Needs Screening Tools for Clinical Populations in Australia and New Zealand: A Scoping Review and Critical Analysis. Socio-Ecological Factors Influencing Maternal and Child Health Outcomes During Floods in South Punjab Pakistan 2025: A Mixed-Methods Approach.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1