Evaluation of the Patient Innovation Partner Role: Perceived Benefits, Structures, Supports, and Recommendations for Lived Experience Engagement in Healthcare Innovation Teams

IF 3.2 3区 医学 Q2 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES Health Expectations Pub Date : 2025-03-27 DOI:10.1111/hex.70194
Shoshana H. Bardach, Amanda Perry, Terry Sturke, Randy Stevens, Milan F. Satcher
{"title":"Evaluation of the Patient Innovation Partner Role: Perceived Benefits, Structures, Supports, and Recommendations for Lived Experience Engagement in Healthcare Innovation Teams","authors":"Shoshana H. Bardach,&nbsp;Amanda Perry,&nbsp;Terry Sturke,&nbsp;Randy Stevens,&nbsp;Milan F. Satcher","doi":"10.1111/hex.70194","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Background</h3>\n \n <p>Patient engagement plays a valuable role in health research and quality improvement. While prior research highlights some principles and key considerations for patient involvement in these efforts, there is a limited understanding of how best to structure and support this engagement, especially from the patient perspective and for healthcare innovation projects.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>Transcripts and notes from semi-structured debrief interviews with patient partners (<i>n</i> = 14) and team leads (<i>n</i> = 22) of 14 healthcare innovation projects conducted between 2020 and 2023 were analyzed thematically to identify perceived benefits, structures and supports that shape lived-experience engagement, and recommendations for future patients' participation in healthcare innovation teams.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>Lived-experience engagement was perceived as highly valuable to project teams and rewarding to the patients themselves. Approaches for structuring and supporting the patient role shaped engagement, highlighting several strategies (e.g., providing patient partners with opportunities to reflect and prepare, having smaller check-ins, truly getting to know the patient, and offering opportunities for in-person connection) to enhance the experience and ameliorate challenges. Patients also emphasized the importance of sharing their perspectives to fully realize the benefits of their engagement.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusion</h3>\n \n <p>These findings highlight the importance of recognizing the bidirectional benefits of patient engagement within project teams. Taking opportunities to check in with patients throughout the project period, both formally and informally, regarding their preferences for involvement and experiences on the team would enable real-time feedback and adjustments to optimize patient partner engagement.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Patient or Public Contribution</h3>\n \n <p>Since its inception, the Susan and Richard Levy Healthcare Delivery Incubator has incorporated patient and public involvement into the design and operations of its healthcare innovation projects. While the conceptualization of this analysis did not engage patients or the public, patients and individuals with lived experience provided the data. Further, three patient partners were engaged in the review of the findings, two of whom also actively contributed to the preparation of the manuscript by reviewing drafts, adding content, and making revisions.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":55070,"journal":{"name":"Health Expectations","volume":"28 2","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/hex.70194","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Health Expectations","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/hex.70194","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

Patient engagement plays a valuable role in health research and quality improvement. While prior research highlights some principles and key considerations for patient involvement in these efforts, there is a limited understanding of how best to structure and support this engagement, especially from the patient perspective and for healthcare innovation projects.

Methods

Transcripts and notes from semi-structured debrief interviews with patient partners (n = 14) and team leads (n = 22) of 14 healthcare innovation projects conducted between 2020 and 2023 were analyzed thematically to identify perceived benefits, structures and supports that shape lived-experience engagement, and recommendations for future patients' participation in healthcare innovation teams.

Results

Lived-experience engagement was perceived as highly valuable to project teams and rewarding to the patients themselves. Approaches for structuring and supporting the patient role shaped engagement, highlighting several strategies (e.g., providing patient partners with opportunities to reflect and prepare, having smaller check-ins, truly getting to know the patient, and offering opportunities for in-person connection) to enhance the experience and ameliorate challenges. Patients also emphasized the importance of sharing their perspectives to fully realize the benefits of their engagement.

Conclusion

These findings highlight the importance of recognizing the bidirectional benefits of patient engagement within project teams. Taking opportunities to check in with patients throughout the project period, both formally and informally, regarding their preferences for involvement and experiences on the team would enable real-time feedback and adjustments to optimize patient partner engagement.

Patient or Public Contribution

Since its inception, the Susan and Richard Levy Healthcare Delivery Incubator has incorporated patient and public involvement into the design and operations of its healthcare innovation projects. While the conceptualization of this analysis did not engage patients or the public, patients and individuals with lived experience provided the data. Further, three patient partners were engaged in the review of the findings, two of whom also actively contributed to the preparation of the manuscript by reviewing drafts, adding content, and making revisions.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
患者创新伙伴角色的评估:医疗保健创新团队生活体验参与的感知利益、结构、支持和建议
背景 患者参与在健康研究和质量改进中发挥着重要作用。虽然先前的研究强调了患者参与这些工作的一些原则和关键注意事项,但对于如何最好地组织和支持这种参与,尤其是从患者的角度和医疗创新项目的角度,人们的了解还很有限。 方法 对 2020 年至 2023 年期间开展的 14 个医疗创新项目的患者合作伙伴(n = 14)和团队领导(n = 22)进行的半结构式汇报访谈的记录和笔记进行了专题分析,以确定形成生活经验参与的感知益处、结构和支持,以及对未来患者参与医疗创新团队的建议。 结果 患者认为生活体验参与对项目团队非常有价值,对患者本身也很有意义。构建和支持患者角色的方法影响了参与度,突出了几种策略(例如,为患者伙伴提供反思和准备的机会,进行较小规模的签到,真正了解患者,以及提供面对面交流的机会)来增强体验和改善挑战。患者还强调了分享自己观点的重要性,以充分实现参与的益处。 结论 这些研究结果突显了在项目团队中认识到患者参与的双向益处的重要性。在整个项目期间,利用各种机会与患者进行正式或非正式的交流,了解他们对参与的偏好以及在团队中的经历,这将有助于实时反馈和调整,从而优化患者伙伴的参与。 患者或公众的贡献 自成立以来,苏珊和理查德-李维医疗服务孵化器已将患者和公众的参与纳入其医疗创新项目的设计和运营中。虽然本分析报告的构思并未让患者或公众参与其中,但患者和有生活经验的个人提供了数据。此外,三位患者合作伙伴参与了研究结果的审核工作,其中两位还通过审阅草稿、添加内容和修改等方式为手稿的撰写做出了积极贡献。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Health Expectations
Health Expectations 医学-公共卫生、环境卫生与职业卫生
CiteScore
5.20
自引率
9.40%
发文量
251
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Health Expectations promotes critical thinking and informed debate about all aspects of patient and public involvement and engagement (PPIE) in health and social care, health policy and health services research including: • Person-centred care and quality improvement • Patients'' participation in decisions about disease prevention and management • Public perceptions of health services • Citizen involvement in health care policy making and priority-setting • Methods for monitoring and evaluating participation • Empowerment and consumerism • Patients'' role in safety and quality • Patient and public role in health services research • Co-production (researchers working with patients and the public) of research, health care and policy Health Expectations is a quarterly, peer-reviewed journal publishing original research, review articles and critical commentaries. It includes papers which clarify concepts, develop theories, and critically analyse and evaluate specific policies and practices. The Journal provides an inter-disciplinary and international forum in which researchers (including PPIE researchers) from a range of backgrounds and expertise can present their work to other researchers, policy-makers, health care professionals, managers, patients and consumer advocates.
期刊最新文献
Addressing Medical Deserts in Europe: Lessons From a Comparative Analysis. Psychosocial Impact of Breast Density Notification Through Breast Cancer Screening: A Qualitative Interview Study. One Eye Open: Reflections on Embedding Lived Experience in Sleep, Circadian Rhythms, and Mood Disorder Research. Developing and Assessing the Acceptability of an Information Booklet for Patients in Surveillance for Abdominal Aortic Aneurysms: An Intervention Development Study. Vital yet Fragile: Informal Networks of Support Among Young People Navigating Long Covid.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1