Gender Participation and Performance in Boccia International-Level Events.

IF 2.5 Q1 SPORT SCIENCES Journal of Functional Morphology and Kinesiology Pub Date : 2025-03-06 DOI:10.3390/jfmk10010087
Cátia C Ferreira, José M Gamonales, Jesús Muñoz-Jiménez, Mário C Espada
{"title":"Gender Participation and Performance in Boccia International-Level Events.","authors":"Cátia C Ferreira, José M Gamonales, Jesús Muñoz-Jiménez, Mário C Espada","doi":"10.3390/jfmk10010087","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Background/Objectives:</b> Boccia is an attractive and growing adapted sport. For approximately 30 years, this parasport was played together by male and female athletes, a fact that recently changed, to our best knowledge, without scientific support. Hence, this study aimed to analyse the relationship between gender participation and performance in Boccia international-level events. <b>Methods:</b> For data collection, four specific international-level Boccia events between 2012 and 2018 were selected as partials were available in the official competition websites (2708 partials, which represent a total of 32,496 ball throws). <b>Results:</b> We found that partials won by male athletes systematically increased between 2012 and 2018 but tended to stabilize between 2017 and 2018, contrary to females, with a growing trend from 2016 onwards. No differences were observed, considering the players' gender and the type of partials (adjusted, balanced, and unbalanced) in the Boccia classes BC1, BC2, and BC3. In BC4 differences were found, but with little variance or low association level (Cramer's Phi coefficient of 0.114). <b>Conclusions:</b> The results emphasize that based on performance, both men and woman can play Boccia together. Although, if the focus of separating genders in Boccia is toward growing and effective female participation and equal success and reward opportunities, this study highlights as a good perspective aiming regular practice of physical activity, exercise, and sport in people with disabilities, promoting their quality of life.</p>","PeriodicalId":16052,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Functional Morphology and Kinesiology","volume":"10 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11943150/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Functional Morphology and Kinesiology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3390/jfmk10010087","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"SPORT SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background/Objectives: Boccia is an attractive and growing adapted sport. For approximately 30 years, this parasport was played together by male and female athletes, a fact that recently changed, to our best knowledge, without scientific support. Hence, this study aimed to analyse the relationship between gender participation and performance in Boccia international-level events. Methods: For data collection, four specific international-level Boccia events between 2012 and 2018 were selected as partials were available in the official competition websites (2708 partials, which represent a total of 32,496 ball throws). Results: We found that partials won by male athletes systematically increased between 2012 and 2018 but tended to stabilize between 2017 and 2018, contrary to females, with a growing trend from 2016 onwards. No differences were observed, considering the players' gender and the type of partials (adjusted, balanced, and unbalanced) in the Boccia classes BC1, BC2, and BC3. In BC4 differences were found, but with little variance or low association level (Cramer's Phi coefficient of 0.114). Conclusions: The results emphasize that based on performance, both men and woman can play Boccia together. Although, if the focus of separating genders in Boccia is toward growing and effective female participation and equal success and reward opportunities, this study highlights as a good perspective aiming regular practice of physical activity, exercise, and sport in people with disabilities, promoting their quality of life.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
地球国际级赛事中的性别参与与表现。
背景/目的:地滚球是一项极具吸引力和适应性的运动。在大约30年的时间里,这项运动是由男女运动员共同进行的,据我们所知,这一事实最近发生了变化,没有科学依据。因此,本研究旨在分析性别参与与乒乓球国际级赛事表现的关系。方法:选取2012年至2018年的四项特定的国际级地球赛作为官方赛事网站上的赛程(2708场赛程,共32496次投球)进行数据收集。结果:我们发现,2012年至2018年期间,男性运动员的部分获奖数量系统增加,但在2017年至2018年期间趋于稳定,与女性相反,从2016年开始呈增长趋势。考虑到BC1、BC2和BC3级别球员的性别和部分类型(调整、平衡和不平衡),没有观察到差异。在BC4中发现差异,但差异较小或关联水平较低(Cramer's Phi系数为0.114)。结论:研究结果强调,基于表现,男性和女性都可以一起玩地球。虽然,如果Boccia性别分离的重点是为了提高女性的有效参与以及平等的成功和奖励机会,那么本研究强调了一个很好的视角,即在残疾人中定期进行体育活动,锻炼和体育运动,提高他们的生活质量。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Functional Morphology and Kinesiology
Journal of Functional Morphology and Kinesiology Health Professions-Physical Therapy, Sports Therapy and Rehabilitation
CiteScore
4.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
94
审稿时长
12 weeks
期刊最新文献
Specific Bioelectrical Vector Reference Values for Italian Adults: A Multicentre Study. Effects of Advanced Resistance Training Systems on Muscle Hypertrophy and Strength in Recreationally Trained Adults: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Risk of Total Ankle Arthroplasty or Ankle Fusion Following Distal Tibial Fractures: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Age-Related Breakpoints in Pacing Variability and Performance in Masters Swimmers: A Segmented Regression Analysis of World Championship Male and Female Data. Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction Failure: Etiology, Classification, and Revision Strategies-A Narrative Review.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1