Pyridostigmine in the management of orthostatic hypotension: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

IF 2.8 Q2 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS Open Heart Pub Date : 2025-03-25 DOI:10.1136/openhrt-2024-003106
Nicholas Vlado Pavic, Shane Zhang, Alexander George Maloof, Rudy Goh, Joshua Kovoor, Pramesh Kovoor, Ron Postuma, Dennis Lau, Suzanne Edwards, Stephen Bacchi
{"title":"Pyridostigmine in the management of orthostatic hypotension: a systematic review and meta-analysis.","authors":"Nicholas Vlado Pavic, Shane Zhang, Alexander George Maloof, Rudy Goh, Joshua Kovoor, Pramesh Kovoor, Ron Postuma, Dennis Lau, Suzanne Edwards, Stephen Bacchi","doi":"10.1136/openhrt-2024-003106","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Current pharmacological approaches for the treatment of orthostatic hypotension (OH) may detrimentally affect supine blood pressure (BP). This side effect is often unacceptable and limits the utility of medical management. Pyridostigmine has been proposed as a potential treatment alternative which may improve OH without worsening supine hypertension. This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to evaluate the currently available data regarding the use of pyridostigmine in the treatment of all-cause OH.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A systematic review was conducted in accordance with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines. PubMed, EMBASE, Cochrane and SCOPUS were searched for publications until 4 June 2024. A random-effects model was used for meta-analysis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The search returned 715 results, of which 6 randomised controlled trials met the inclusion criteria. Several studies reported a statistically significant improvement in orthostatic BP following pyridostigmine administration. Two studies found that pyridostigmine had no effect on standing BP among patients with severe autonomic failure. One study suggested that combination therapy with atomoxetine may elicit a synergistic effect. In most studies, pyridostigmine had no significant effect on supine BP. Adverse effects were minimal across the included studies. The pooled results from the meta-analysis showed that while pyridostigmine alone resulted in lower systolic and diastolic orthostatic drop, neither result was statistically significant. However, when pyridostigmine is combined with midodrine, this demonstrated a significant improvement in systolic orthostatic drop.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Pyridostigmine may be useful in the management of OH, particularly in patients with supine hypertension. The standing BP response to pyridostigmine may be greater in patients who have a relatively preserved baroreflex function and sympathetic reserve.</p><p><strong>Prospero registration number: </strong>CRD42024555402.</p>","PeriodicalId":19505,"journal":{"name":"Open Heart","volume":"12 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11938227/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Open Heart","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1136/openhrt-2024-003106","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Current pharmacological approaches for the treatment of orthostatic hypotension (OH) may detrimentally affect supine blood pressure (BP). This side effect is often unacceptable and limits the utility of medical management. Pyridostigmine has been proposed as a potential treatment alternative which may improve OH without worsening supine hypertension. This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to evaluate the currently available data regarding the use of pyridostigmine in the treatment of all-cause OH.

Methods: A systematic review was conducted in accordance with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines. PubMed, EMBASE, Cochrane and SCOPUS were searched for publications until 4 June 2024. A random-effects model was used for meta-analysis.

Results: The search returned 715 results, of which 6 randomised controlled trials met the inclusion criteria. Several studies reported a statistically significant improvement in orthostatic BP following pyridostigmine administration. Two studies found that pyridostigmine had no effect on standing BP among patients with severe autonomic failure. One study suggested that combination therapy with atomoxetine may elicit a synergistic effect. In most studies, pyridostigmine had no significant effect on supine BP. Adverse effects were minimal across the included studies. The pooled results from the meta-analysis showed that while pyridostigmine alone resulted in lower systolic and diastolic orthostatic drop, neither result was statistically significant. However, when pyridostigmine is combined with midodrine, this demonstrated a significant improvement in systolic orthostatic drop.

Conclusions: Pyridostigmine may be useful in the management of OH, particularly in patients with supine hypertension. The standing BP response to pyridostigmine may be greater in patients who have a relatively preserved baroreflex function and sympathetic reserve.

Prospero registration number: CRD42024555402.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
吡哆斯的明治疗体位性低血压:一项系统综述和荟萃分析。
背景:目前治疗体位性低血压(OH)的药理学方法可能对仰卧位血压(BP)产生不利影响。这种副作用往往是不可接受的,并限制了医疗管理的效用。吡哆斯的明被认为是一种潜在的治疗选择,可以改善OH而不会加重仰卧位高血压。本系统综述和荟萃分析旨在评估目前有关吡哆斯的明治疗全因OH的可用数据。方法:按照系统评价和荟萃分析指南的首选报告项目进行系统评价。检索PubMed、EMBASE、Cochrane和SCOPUS,检索截止到2024年6月4日的出版物。meta分析采用随机效应模型。结果:检索得到715个结果,其中6个随机对照试验符合纳入标准。几项研究报道了吡哆斯的明治疗后直立性血压的显著改善。两项研究发现吡哆斯的明对严重自主神经衰竭患者的血压无影响。一项研究表明,与托莫西汀联合治疗可能会产生协同效应。在大多数研究中,吡哆斯的明对仰卧位血压无显著影响。在纳入的研究中,不良反应最小。荟萃分析的汇总结果显示,虽然单独使用吡哆斯的明可以降低收缩压和舒张压,但这两个结果都没有统计学意义。然而,当吡哆斯的明与米多定联合使用时,收缩期直立性下降有显著改善。结论:吡多斯的明可能对OH的治疗有用,特别是对仰卧位高血压患者。在血压反射功能和交感神经储备相对保留的患者中,吡啶斯的明对血压的反应可能更大。普洛斯彼罗注册号:CRD42024555402。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Open Heart
Open Heart CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS-
CiteScore
4.60
自引率
3.70%
发文量
145
审稿时长
20 weeks
期刊介绍: Open Heart is an online-only, open access cardiology journal that aims to be “open” in many ways: open access (free access for all readers), open peer review (unblinded peer review) and open data (data sharing is encouraged). The goal is to ensure maximum transparency and maximum impact on research progress and patient care. The journal is dedicated to publishing high quality, peer reviewed medical research in all disciplines and therapeutic areas of cardiovascular medicine. Research is published across all study phases and designs, from study protocols to phase I trials to meta-analyses, including small or specialist studies. Opinionated discussions on controversial topics are welcomed. Open Heart aims to operate a fast submission and review process with continuous publication online, to ensure timely, up-to-date research is available worldwide. The journal adheres to a rigorous and transparent peer review process, and all articles go through a statistical assessment to ensure robustness of the analyses. Open Heart is an official journal of the British Cardiovascular Society.
期刊最新文献
Prognostic value of cardiac fibroblast activation heterogeneity assessed by FAPI PET radiomics in hypertrophic cardiomyopathy: a proof-of-concept study. Women's IschemiA TRial to Reduce Events In Non-ObstRuctive CAD (WARRIOR): a randomised controlled trial. Periprocedural evaluation of patients with BAV stenosis undergoing TAVR: a machine learning-based study. Increase in cardiovascular deaths during the COVID-19 pandemic in Peru: a 5-year analysis of the national death system. Transvenous lead extraction: predictors of procedure complexity.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1