The effect of strength training interventions on people with congenital heart disease: a systematic review.

IF 2.8 Q2 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS Open Heart Pub Date : 2025-03-25 DOI:10.1136/openhrt-2024-003091
Kunyu Hao, Curtis Adrian Wadey, Alan R Barker, Craig A Williams
{"title":"The effect of strength training interventions on people with congenital heart disease: a systematic review.","authors":"Kunyu Hao, Curtis Adrian Wadey, Alan R Barker, Craig A Williams","doi":"10.1136/openhrt-2024-003091","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Aim: </strong>To assess the effectiveness and safety of strength training (ST) interventions in people with congenital heart disease (ConHD).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Participants included people of all ages diagnosed with all complexity of ConHD. Interventions included strength training or inspiratory muscle training (IMT) which were delivered in whole or as part of a more holistic programme. Included studies were randomised controlled trials, non-randomised controlled trials and cohort studies. A comprehensive literature search using five databases until June 2023 was conducted. Two authors independently screened all the identified studies and assessed the risk of bias. Due to the paucity of studies and significant differences in study design, albatross plots were produced, and synthesis without meta-analyses was used to assist in the interpretation of results.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 26 studies were included with a total of 659 participants (53% female). Three of five studies demonstrated that ST significantly improves muscle strength. The albatross plots (20 studies) compared peak oxygen consumption (peak V̇O<sub>2</sub>) of ST alone, combined training and IMT and showed that 16 studies observed an improvement with a standardised mean difference between 0.10 and 0.50. Combined training was more effective than ST alone and IMT for peak V̇O<sub>2</sub>, and ST alone was second. The results showed high heterogeneity. Three studies (one ST alone and two combined training) reported a total of five adverse events, but none reported serious adverse events or fatalities.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This systematic review indicates a moderate improvement in muscle strength by ST alone, with a small improvement in peak V̇O<sub>2</sub> in people with ConHD. Although the outcomes are positive, there is still insufficient evidence to establish the clinical significance of ST.</p>","PeriodicalId":19505,"journal":{"name":"Open Heart","volume":"12 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11938245/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Open Heart","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1136/openhrt-2024-003091","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Aim: To assess the effectiveness and safety of strength training (ST) interventions in people with congenital heart disease (ConHD).

Methods: Participants included people of all ages diagnosed with all complexity of ConHD. Interventions included strength training or inspiratory muscle training (IMT) which were delivered in whole or as part of a more holistic programme. Included studies were randomised controlled trials, non-randomised controlled trials and cohort studies. A comprehensive literature search using five databases until June 2023 was conducted. Two authors independently screened all the identified studies and assessed the risk of bias. Due to the paucity of studies and significant differences in study design, albatross plots were produced, and synthesis without meta-analyses was used to assist in the interpretation of results.

Results: A total of 26 studies were included with a total of 659 participants (53% female). Three of five studies demonstrated that ST significantly improves muscle strength. The albatross plots (20 studies) compared peak oxygen consumption (peak V̇O2) of ST alone, combined training and IMT and showed that 16 studies observed an improvement with a standardised mean difference between 0.10 and 0.50. Combined training was more effective than ST alone and IMT for peak V̇O2, and ST alone was second. The results showed high heterogeneity. Three studies (one ST alone and two combined training) reported a total of five adverse events, but none reported serious adverse events or fatalities.

Conclusion: This systematic review indicates a moderate improvement in muscle strength by ST alone, with a small improvement in peak V̇O2 in people with ConHD. Although the outcomes are positive, there is still insufficient evidence to establish the clinical significance of ST.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
力量训练干预对先天性心脏病患者的影响:系统综述。
目的:评价力量训练(ST)干预对先天性心脏病(ConHD)患者的有效性和安全性。方法:参与者包括所有年龄诊断为各种复杂性ConHD的人。干预措施包括力量训练或吸气肌训练(IMT),作为整体或作为更全面的计划的一部分。纳入的研究包括随机对照试验、非随机对照试验和队列研究。到2023年6月,对5个数据库进行了全面的文献检索。两位作者独立筛选了所有确定的研究并评估了偏倚风险。由于研究的缺乏和研究设计的显著差异,产生了信天翁图,并使用不含荟萃分析的综合来协助解释结果。结果:共纳入26项研究,共659名参与者(53%为女性)。五分之三的研究表明,ST可以显著提高肌肉力量。信天翁图(20项研究)比较了单纯ST、联合训练和IMT的峰值耗氧量(峰值V / O2),结果显示,16项研究观察到改善,标准化平均差异在0.10和0.50之间。综合训练对峰值V (O2)的效果优于单纯ST + IMT,单纯ST次之。结果显示高度异质性。三项研究(一项单纯ST和两项联合训练)共报告了5个不良事件,但没有报告严重不良事件或死亡。结论:本系统综述表明,ConHD患者单独使用ST可适度改善肌力,并可小幅改善峰值V / O2。虽然结果是阳性的,但尚没有足够的证据来确定ST的临床意义。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Open Heart
Open Heart CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS-
CiteScore
4.60
自引率
3.70%
发文量
145
审稿时长
20 weeks
期刊介绍: Open Heart is an online-only, open access cardiology journal that aims to be “open” in many ways: open access (free access for all readers), open peer review (unblinded peer review) and open data (data sharing is encouraged). The goal is to ensure maximum transparency and maximum impact on research progress and patient care. The journal is dedicated to publishing high quality, peer reviewed medical research in all disciplines and therapeutic areas of cardiovascular medicine. Research is published across all study phases and designs, from study protocols to phase I trials to meta-analyses, including small or specialist studies. Opinionated discussions on controversial topics are welcomed. Open Heart aims to operate a fast submission and review process with continuous publication online, to ensure timely, up-to-date research is available worldwide. The journal adheres to a rigorous and transparent peer review process, and all articles go through a statistical assessment to ensure robustness of the analyses. Open Heart is an official journal of the British Cardiovascular Society.
期刊最新文献
Prognostic impact of corticosteroid maintenance dose and re-escalation in patients with cardiac sarcoidosis. Retrospective analysis of the performance of the PROMISE minimal risk tool for patients presenting with recent onset stable chest pain. Development and validation of diagnostic and prognostic models for heart failure in unstable angina patients. Worse risk profile, number of grafts and hospital death but acceptable late survival in females undergoing coronary surgery: a 20-year propensity matched analysis. Depression may not be an independent risk factor for mortality in patients with cardiovascular disease: data from NHANES 2011-2018.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1