Examining the determinants of travel time use and the transfer of activities into trips

IF 7.2 1区 工程技术 Q1 ECONOMICS Transportation Research Part A-Policy and Practice Pub Date : 2025-05-01 Epub Date: 2025-03-27 DOI:10.1016/j.tra.2025.104460
Ana Luiza S. de Sá , Patrícia Sauri Lavieri , Jacek Pawlak
{"title":"Examining the determinants of travel time use and the transfer of activities into trips","authors":"Ana Luiza S. de Sá ,&nbsp;Patrícia Sauri Lavieri ,&nbsp;Jacek Pawlak","doi":"10.1016/j.tra.2025.104460","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Travel time use has long been hypothesised to affect behavioural aspects of travel demand, such as mode choice and the value of travel time. However, travel time use can also influence how people organise their daily schedules because travellers can perform activities that release time outside the journey, a behaviour we call “activity transfer” in this study. This research develops a comprehensive conceptual framework to investigate the determinants of travel time use and activity transfer. For that, we utilise a rich dataset of a representative sample (n = 1673) of the Greater Melbourne and Geelong population (Australia) and implement an Integrated Choice Latent Variable (ICLV) model. We model three mutually exclusive behaviours: (1) no engagement in travel time use; (2) travel time use without activity transfer; and (3) travel time use with activity transfer, during a trip towards the individuals’ main activity (e.g., work, study, or other main trip purpose). The ICLV results indicate activity transfer as a time-management strategy for people overlapping different roles and, thus, potentially having more time constraints. Conversely, travel time use without transfer seems to be a strategy for decreasing the dislike of travelling. Activity transfer is more likely to occur in passengerised modes (i.e., public transport and car passenger) with favourable travel conditions (e.g., seat availability) and less likely to occur on short journeys. Bringing laptops with an internet connection to the trip is associated with travel time use with and without activity transfer, while smartphones are predictors only of the latter. Importantly, after controlling for other time-use-related latent constructs, polychronicity becomes a weak predictor of travel time use and activity transfer, suggesting a potential omitted variable bias in previous research. By unveiling fundamental aspects of travel time use, our results have significant implications for transport practice, including public transport investments, long-distance travel modes, and passenger vehicle automation.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":49421,"journal":{"name":"Transportation Research Part A-Policy and Practice","volume":"195 ","pages":"Article 104460"},"PeriodicalIF":7.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Transportation Research Part A-Policy and Practice","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0965856425000886","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/3/27 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ECONOMICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Travel time use has long been hypothesised to affect behavioural aspects of travel demand, such as mode choice and the value of travel time. However, travel time use can also influence how people organise their daily schedules because travellers can perform activities that release time outside the journey, a behaviour we call “activity transfer” in this study. This research develops a comprehensive conceptual framework to investigate the determinants of travel time use and activity transfer. For that, we utilise a rich dataset of a representative sample (n = 1673) of the Greater Melbourne and Geelong population (Australia) and implement an Integrated Choice Latent Variable (ICLV) model. We model three mutually exclusive behaviours: (1) no engagement in travel time use; (2) travel time use without activity transfer; and (3) travel time use with activity transfer, during a trip towards the individuals’ main activity (e.g., work, study, or other main trip purpose). The ICLV results indicate activity transfer as a time-management strategy for people overlapping different roles and, thus, potentially having more time constraints. Conversely, travel time use without transfer seems to be a strategy for decreasing the dislike of travelling. Activity transfer is more likely to occur in passengerised modes (i.e., public transport and car passenger) with favourable travel conditions (e.g., seat availability) and less likely to occur on short journeys. Bringing laptops with an internet connection to the trip is associated with travel time use with and without activity transfer, while smartphones are predictors only of the latter. Importantly, after controlling for other time-use-related latent constructs, polychronicity becomes a weak predictor of travel time use and activity transfer, suggesting a potential omitted variable bias in previous research. By unveiling fundamental aspects of travel time use, our results have significant implications for transport practice, including public transport investments, long-distance travel modes, and passenger vehicle automation.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
考察旅行时间使用的决定因素和将活动转移到旅行中
长期以来,人们一直假设出行时间的使用会影响出行需求的行为方面,比如出行方式的选择和出行时间的价值。然而,旅行时间的使用也会影响人们安排日常日程的方式,因为旅行者可以在旅行之外进行活动,从而释放时间,我们在本研究中将这种行为称为“活动转移”。本研究开发了一个全面的概念框架来研究旅行时间使用和活动转移的决定因素。为此,我们利用了大墨尔本和吉朗人口(澳大利亚)的代表性样本(n = 1673)的丰富数据集,并实施了综合选择潜在变量(ICLV)模型。我们模拟了三种相互排斥的行为:(1)不参与旅行时间的使用;(2)无活动转移的出行时间利用;(3)在前往个人主要活动(例如,工作、学习或其他主要旅行目的)的旅行期间,活动转移的旅行时间使用。ICLV的结果表明,活动转移是一种时间管理策略,适用于重叠不同角色的人,因此可能有更多的时间限制。相反,不转乘的旅行时间利用似乎是减少对旅行厌恶的一种策略。活动转移更有可能发生在客运模式(即公共交通和汽车乘客),具有有利的旅行条件(如座位可用性),而不太可能发生在短途旅行中。在旅行中携带可上网的笔记本电脑与旅行时间的使用有关,无论是否有活动转移,而智能手机只能预测后者。重要的是,在控制了其他与时间使用相关的潜在构念后,多时性成为旅行时间使用和活动转移的弱预测因子,这表明在之前的研究中可能存在遗漏的变量偏差。通过揭示旅行时间使用的基本方面,我们的研究结果对交通实践具有重要意义,包括公共交通投资、长途旅行模式和乘用车自动化。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
13.20
自引率
7.80%
发文量
257
审稿时长
9.8 months
期刊介绍: Transportation Research: Part A contains papers of general interest in all passenger and freight transportation modes: policy analysis, formulation and evaluation; planning; interaction with the political, socioeconomic and physical environment; design, management and evaluation of transportation systems. Topics are approached from any discipline or perspective: economics, engineering, sociology, psychology, etc. Case studies, survey and expository papers are included, as are articles which contribute to unification of the field, or to an understanding of the comparative aspects of different systems. Papers which assess the scope for technological innovation within a social or political framework are also published. The journal is international, and places equal emphasis on the problems of industrialized and non-industrialized regions. Part A''s aims and scope are complementary to Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Part C: Emerging Technologies and Part D: Transport and Environment. Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review. Part F: Traffic Psychology and Behaviour. The complete set forms the most cohesive and comprehensive reference of current research in transportation science.
期刊最新文献
Penalties as prices? evaluating airline strategic responses to tarmac delay penalties in the US Hydrogen-powered aviation: What do we know and where do we go? Urban informal transportation and gentrification: empirical evidence from motorcycle taxis in Bangkok, Thailand Impacts of transportation infrastructure on the stopping behavior of heavy commercial vehicles Tracks of equality: high-speed rail and its effects on intra-regional inequality—a quasi-experimental study based on China’s district/county-level data
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1