Assessing the predictive accuracy of ChatGPT-based image analysis in forecasting long-term scar characteristics from 3-month assessments – A pilot study

Antoinette T. Nguyen , Rena A. Li , Robert D. Galiano
{"title":"Assessing the predictive accuracy of ChatGPT-based image analysis in forecasting long-term scar characteristics from 3-month assessments – A pilot study","authors":"Antoinette T. Nguyen ,&nbsp;Rena A. Li ,&nbsp;Robert D. Galiano","doi":"10.1016/j.bjps.2025.03.021","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><div>Scarring significantly impacts patient quality of life, yet traditional assessments often rely on subjective evaluations, resulting in variability in predictions. This study aimed to evaluate the predictive accuracy of a Smart Image Analysis ChatGPT model in forecasting scar characteristics.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>This single-institution prospective cohort study included 40 patients who underwent plastic surgery. Scar images were captured at 3 and 12 months, assessing characteristics such as vascularity, pigmentation, height, and width. The ChatGPT model predicted binary outcomes (good vs. bad scars) and continuous outcomes. Predictive accuracy was measured using metrics including mean absolute error (MAE), mean squared error (MSE), root mean squared error (RMSE), and R-squared (R²).</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>The model achieved an overall accuracy of 97.5% for binary classifications of scars. McNemar's test confirmed no significant differences between predicted and actual outcomes. For continuous outcomes, the MAE was 0.65, with an MSE of 0.9 and RMSE of 0.95, indicating moderate accuracy. Vascularity predictions yielded an R² of 0.234, whereas height and width showed stronger correlations with R² values of 0.857 and 0.956, respectively. Statistically significant differences in paired t-tests were observed for pigmentation (t = 4.356, p = 9.319e-05) and width (t = 2.896, p = 0.0062).</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>The Smart Image Analysis ChatGPT model demonstrates excellent predictive accuracy in binary scar classification and provides valuable insights for scar characteristics. Further refinement is necessary for improving predictions of dynamic features such as vascularity.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":50084,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Plastic Reconstructive and Aesthetic Surgery","volume":"104 ","pages":"Pages 200-208"},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Plastic Reconstructive and Aesthetic Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S174868152500186X","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction

Scarring significantly impacts patient quality of life, yet traditional assessments often rely on subjective evaluations, resulting in variability in predictions. This study aimed to evaluate the predictive accuracy of a Smart Image Analysis ChatGPT model in forecasting scar characteristics.

Methods

This single-institution prospective cohort study included 40 patients who underwent plastic surgery. Scar images were captured at 3 and 12 months, assessing characteristics such as vascularity, pigmentation, height, and width. The ChatGPT model predicted binary outcomes (good vs. bad scars) and continuous outcomes. Predictive accuracy was measured using metrics including mean absolute error (MAE), mean squared error (MSE), root mean squared error (RMSE), and R-squared (R²).

Results

The model achieved an overall accuracy of 97.5% for binary classifications of scars. McNemar's test confirmed no significant differences between predicted and actual outcomes. For continuous outcomes, the MAE was 0.65, with an MSE of 0.9 and RMSE of 0.95, indicating moderate accuracy. Vascularity predictions yielded an R² of 0.234, whereas height and width showed stronger correlations with R² values of 0.857 and 0.956, respectively. Statistically significant differences in paired t-tests were observed for pigmentation (t = 4.356, p = 9.319e-05) and width (t = 2.896, p = 0.0062).

Conclusion

The Smart Image Analysis ChatGPT model demonstrates excellent predictive accuracy in binary scar classification and provides valuable insights for scar characteristics. Further refinement is necessary for improving predictions of dynamic features such as vascularity.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
评估基于chatgpt的图像分析在预测3个月的长期疤痕特征中的预测准确性-一项试点研究
疤痕显著影响患者的生活质量,然而传统的评估往往依赖于主观评估,导致预测的可变性。本研究旨在评估智能图像分析ChatGPT模型在预测疤痕特征方面的预测准确性。方法本研究为单机构前瞻性队列研究,纳入40例接受整形手术的患者。在3个月和12个月时采集疤痕图像,评估诸如血管状况、色素沉着、高度和宽度等特征。ChatGPT模型预测了二元结果(好疤痕vs坏疤痕)和连续结果。采用平均绝对误差(MAE)、均方误差(MSE)、均方根误差(RMSE)和R平方(R²)等指标测量预测准确性。结果该模型对疤痕的二元分类总体准确率为97.5%。McNemar的测试证实,预测结果和实际结果之间没有显著差异。对于连续结果,MAE为0.65,MSE为0.9,RMSE为0.95,表明准确度中等。血管密度预测的R²为0.234,而高度和宽度的R²值分别为0.857和0.956,相关性更强。配对t检验中,色素沉着(t = 4.356, p = 9.319e-05)和宽度(t = 2.896, p = 0.0062)的差异有统计学意义。结论智能图像分析ChatGPT模型在疤痕二值分类中具有良好的预测准确性,为疤痕特征提供了有价值的见解。进一步的细化是必要的,以提高预测的动态特征,如血管。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.10
自引率
11.10%
发文量
578
审稿时长
3.5 months
期刊介绍: JPRAS An International Journal of Surgical Reconstruction is one of the world''s leading international journals, covering all the reconstructive and aesthetic aspects of plastic surgery. The journal presents the latest surgical procedures with audit and outcome studies of new and established techniques in plastic surgery including: cleft lip and palate and other heads and neck surgery, hand surgery, lower limb trauma, burns, skin cancer, breast surgery and aesthetic surgery.
期刊最新文献
Rate of fistula repair following palatoplasty in patients with cleft lip and palate: A systematic review of the literature Editorial Board Letter Re: Single modality indocyanine green is feasible for sentinel node detection in head and neck cutaneous melanoma: A prospective cohort study Plastic surgery training in the United Kingdom and Ireland in 2025: Results of the National Training Survey Correspondence on: ‘First experience from 200 cases with a new breast tissue expander for multi-stage pre-pectoral breast reconstruction after mastectomy’
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1